DUK vs ETR Stock Comparison
Compare DUK and ETR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DUK and ETR?
DUK leads the current stock comparison as Duke Energy Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Duke Energy Corporation vs Entergy Corporation
DUK leads
DUK leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality.
Competitive: 2 of 6 evidence groups support DUK, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Duke Energy Corporation
Entergy Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DUK over ETR, 45 versus 39 as of Sep 11, 2026. DUK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while ETR holds the stronger momentum profile. DUK also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DUK today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. DUK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Duke Energy Corporation and Entergy Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DUK and ETR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value53 vs 37DUK +16
- Quality45 vs 30DUK +15
- Momentum31 vs 44ETR +13
- Risk Resilience52 vs 54Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor DUK. DUK’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; ETR keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No new signals fired.
DUK's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DUK and ETR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DUK (Duke Energy Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
ETR (Entergy Corporation): the counter-case, on momentum, fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DUKDUK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ETRETR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DUKDUK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
ETRETR on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
DUKDUK carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DUK | ETR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.6% | +15.1% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +7.3% | +33.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DUK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DUK | 45 vs 39 |
| Fundamentals | ETRon balance | revenue growth -17.3% vs 10.5%; EPS growth -29.9% vs 25%; TTM ROE 9.9% vs 10.4%; gross margin 68.2% vs 38.9%; operating margin 27.6% vs 22.2% — ETR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DUK | Value 53 vs 37 |
| Technicals | ETR | Price vs 50-day -3.9% vs -4.1%; vs 200-day -3.7% vs 0.1% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 52 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 14.6% vs 15.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DUK and ETR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DUK.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10DUK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DUK +6
- 45 vs 39
- 7 sessions ago
- DUK +5
- 44 vs 39
- 30 sessions ago
- DUK +5
- 45 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- DUK +8
- 54 vs 46
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.05%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.87%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.04%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.38%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ETR closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to DUK's edge.
- 2ETR's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3DUK's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ETR leads on balance| Metric | DUK | ETR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -17.3% | 10.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -29.9% | 25% |
| Gross margin | 68.2% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 27.6% | 22.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 9.9% | 10.4% |
| Debt to equity | 1.67 | 1.88 |
Performance
ETR leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | DUK | ETR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1% | -1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.3% | -2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.5% | -4.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -8.2% | 1.8% |
| Year to date | 1.8% | 14.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -0.7% | 21.8% |
Technicals
ETR has the stronger structure| Metric | DUK | ETR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.4 | 44.2 |
| ADX (14) | 18.8 | 13.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3.9% | -4.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -3.7% | 0.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 13.8% | 15.7% |
Risk
Split| Metric | DUK | ETR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.3 | 0.19 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.22 | 0.86 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.34 | 1.26 |
| Max drawdown | -11.7% | -11.3% |
| Current drawdown | -10.6% | -10.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 16.1% | 20.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.7% | -2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DUK or ETR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DUK is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 45 against ETR's 39. The edge comes from value and quality. ETR is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DUK or ETR the better buy right now?
DUK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DUK over ETR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DUK leads Value by 16 points; DUK leads Quality by 15 points; ETR leads Momentum by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DUK or ETR?
Analyst price targets imply +14.6% upside for DUK and +15.1% for ETR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DUK or ETR?
DUK is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DUK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DUK or ETR?
ETR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DUK or ETR?
ETR on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DUK or ETR?
DUK is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DUK carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DUK more profitable than ETR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 68.2% vs 38.9%; operating margin 27.6% vs 22.2%; ttm roe 9.9% vs 10.4%. DUK leads on two measures and ETR on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is DUK's lead over ETR getting stronger or weaker?
DUK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the DUK vs ETR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ETR closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to DUK's edge; ETR's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; DUK's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DUK and ETR?
DUK: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. ETR: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on DUK is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ETR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DUK and ETR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.