DVN vs EQNR Stock Comparison
Compare DVN and EQNR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DVN and EQNR?
EQNR leads the current stock comparison as Equinor ASA, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Devon Energy Corporation vs Equinor ASA
EQNR leads
EQNR leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from DVN. Wall Street currently favors DVN on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support EQNR, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Devon Energy Corporation
Equinor ASA
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors EQNR over DVN, 59 versus 56 as of Sep 11, 2026. EQNR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while DVN holds the stronger risk resilience profile. EQNR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors DVN. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EQNR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. EQNR lead: Reversed — DVN led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; EQNR now leads by 3.
Compare Devon Energy Corporation and Equinor ASA across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DVN and EQNR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value52 vs 60EQNR +8
- Risk Resilience50 vs 42DVN +8
- Momentum66 vs 71EQNR +5
- Quality56 vs 56Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor EQNR. EQNR’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; DVN keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No new signals fired.
EQNR's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DVN and EQNR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
EQNR (Equinor ASA): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
DVN (Devon Energy Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EQNREQNR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DVNDVN on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EQNREQNR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
EQNREQNR on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
DVNDVN on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
DVNDVN on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors EQNR, analyst targets favor DVN. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | DVN | EQNR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +23.8% | -18.5% | DVN has more room |
| Target dispersion | +29% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Sell | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 14 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EQNR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 56 vs 59 |
| Fundamentals | EQNRon balance | revenue growth 94.8% vs 24.1%; EPS growth 9.7% vs 60.5%; TTM ROE 14.9% vs 21.6%; gross margin 34% vs 35.9%; operating margin 23.9% vs 29.6% — EQNR takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | EQNR | Value 52 vs 60 |
| Technicals | EQNR | Price vs 50-day 11% vs 13.3%; vs 200-day 14.4% vs 33.6% |
| Risk Resilience | DVN | Risk Resilience 50 vs 42 |
| Analyst expectations | DVN | Target upside 23.8% vs -18.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DVN and EQNR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on EQNR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10EQNR lead: Reversed — DVN led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; EQNR now leads by 3.
- Today
- EQNR +3
- 56 vs 59
- 7 sessions ago
- EQNR +1
- 56 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- DVN +3
- 61 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- EQNR +1
- 52 vs 53
The lead changed hands 9 times in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when EQNR moved ahead of DVN.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.51%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
6 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.10%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.42%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.69%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DVN closes the Value gap — currently 8 points behind, the largest single contributor to EQNR's edge.
- 2DVN's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3EQNR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
EQNR leads on balance| Metric | DVN | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 94.8% | 24.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 9.7% | 60.5% |
| Gross margin | 34% | 35.9% |
| Operating margin | 23.9% | 29.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 14.9% | 21.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.28 | 0.75 |
Performance
EQNR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | DVN | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2% | 3.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 11.5% | 10.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 7.3% | 20.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 10.3% | 34.5% |
| Year to date | 36.6% | 84.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 44.9% | 85.8% |
Technicals
EQNR has the stronger structure| Metric | DVN | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 54.7 | 60.8 |
| ADX (14) | 15.5 | 21.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 11% | 13.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 14.4% | 33.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 26.6% | 31.6% |
Risk
DVN is the more resilient| Metric | DVN | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.58 | -0.9 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.15 | 1.7 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.72 | 2.59 |
| Max drawdown | -22.7% | -26.8% |
| Current drawdown | -3.9% | -0.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 34.8% | 38.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.7% | -3.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DVN or EQNR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, EQNR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 59 against DVN's 56. The edge comes from value and momentum. DVN is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DVN or EQNR the better buy right now?
EQNR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor EQNR over DVN?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. EQNR leads Value by 8 points; DVN leads Risk Resilience by 8 points; EQNR leads Momentum by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DVN or EQNR?
Analyst price targets imply +23.8% upside for DVN and -18.5% for EQNR, so the Street currently favors DVN. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors EQNR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DVN or EQNR?
EQNR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. EQNR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DVN or EQNR?
DVN on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DVN or EQNR?
EQNR on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DVN or EQNR?
DVN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DVN on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DVN more profitable than EQNR?
EQNR leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 34% vs 35.9%; operating margin 23.9% vs 29.6%; ttm roe 14.9% vs 21.6%.
Is EQNR's lead over DVN getting stronger or weaker?
EQNR lead: Reversed — DVN led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; EQNR now leads by 3. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 9 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when EQNR moved ahead of DVN.
What would change the DVN vs EQNR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DVN closes the Value gap — currently 8 points behind, the largest single contributor to EQNR's edge; DVN's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; EQNR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DVN and EQNR?
DVN: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. EQNR: 6 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on DVN is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On EQNR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DVN and EQNR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.