EG vs HIG Stock Comparison
Compare EG and HIG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between EG and HIG?
HIG leads the current stock comparison as The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Everest Group, Ltd. vs The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
HIG leads
HIG leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 11 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support HIG, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Everest Group, Ltd.
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HIG over EG, 63 versus 56 as of Sep 11, 2026. HIG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while EG holds the stronger value profile. HIG also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HIG today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. HIG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Everest Group, Ltd. and The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare EG and HIG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience52 vs 74HIG +22
- Quality52 vs 69HIG +17
- Value70 vs 65EG +5
- Momentum48 vs 47Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor HIG. HIG’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; EG keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No new signals fired.
HIG's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — EG and HIG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HIG (The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
EG (Everest Group, Ltd.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HIGHIG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HIGHIG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EGEG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
HIGHIG on Risk Resilience, by 22 points.
Analyst upside
HIGHIG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | EG | HIG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +4.6% | +11% | HIG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +37% | +5.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HIG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HIG | 56 vs 63 |
| Fundamentals | HIG | revenue growth -2.6% vs 0.5%; EPS growth -14.4% vs 51.3%; TTM ROE 12.4% vs 23%; gross margin 28.8% vs 43.9%; operating margin 15.4% vs 15.2% |
| Valuation | EG | Value 70 vs 65 |
| Technicals | EG | Price vs 50-day -0.6% vs -2.1%; vs 200-day 8% vs 0.4% |
| Risk Resilience | HIG | Risk Resilience 52 vs 74 |
| Analyst expectations | HIG | Target upside 4.6% vs 11% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of EG and HIG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HIG.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10HIG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- HIG +7
- 56 vs 63
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 64 vs 64
- 30 sessions ago
- HIG +11
- 52 vs 63
- 90 sessions ago
- HIG +5
- 67 vs 72
The lead changed hands 9 times in this window, most recently on Sep 3 when HIG moved ahead of EG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (8.86%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.20%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
HIG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.18%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.32%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1EG closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to HIG's edge.
- 2EG's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3HIG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 7-point move would eliminate HIG's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HIG leads on balance| Metric | EG | HIG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.6% | 0.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -14.4% | 51.3% |
| Gross margin | 28.8% | 43.9% |
| Operating margin | 15.4% | 15.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12.4% | 23% |
| Debt to equity | 0.23 | 0.22 |
Performance
EG leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | EG | HIG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.9% | -0.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2% | -0.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 10.2% | 5.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 15.4% | 1.4% |
| Year to date | 9.3% | -0.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 9.3% | 4.7% |
Technicals
EG has the stronger structure| Metric | EG | HIG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 52.5 | 49.2 |
| ADX (14) | 14.7 | 13 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.6% | -2.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 8% | 0.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 19.6% | 18.1% |
Risk
HIG is the more resilient| Metric | EG | HIG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.07 | -0.09 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.31 | 0.13 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.37 | 0.2 |
| Max drawdown | -16.4% | -12.3% |
| Current drawdown | -6.9% | -6.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 25% | 19.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.3% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, EG or HIG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HIG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 63 against EG's 56. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. EG is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is EG or HIG the better buy right now?
HIG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HIG over EG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HIG leads Risk Resilience by 22 points; HIG leads Quality by 17 points; EG leads Value by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, EG or HIG?
Analyst price targets imply +4.6% upside for EG and +11% for HIG, so the Street currently favors HIG. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, EG or HIG?
EG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. EG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, EG or HIG?
HIG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, EG or HIG?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, EG or HIG?
HIG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HIG on Risk Resilience, by 22 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is EG more profitable than HIG?
HIG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 28.8% vs 43.9%; operating margin 15.4% vs 15.2%; ttm roe 12.4% vs 23%.
Is HIG's lead over EG getting stronger or weaker?
HIG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 9 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-03, when HIG moved ahead of EG.
What would change the EG vs HIG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: EG closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to HIG's edge; EG's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; HIG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 7-point move would eliminate HIG's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about EG and HIG?
EG: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. HIG: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on EG is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On HIG it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare EG and HIG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.