EIX vs ETR Stock Comparison
Compare EIX and ETR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between EIX and ETR?
EIX leads the current stock comparison as Edison International, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Edison International vs Entergy Corporation
EIX leads
EIX leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 9 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support EIX, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Edison International
Entergy Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors EIX over ETR, 42 versus 39 as of Sep 11, 2026. EIX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while ETR holds the stronger momentum profile. EIX also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EIX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. EIX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Edison International and Entergy Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare EIX and ETR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value71 vs 37EIX +34
- Momentum19 vs 44ETR +25
- Risk Resilience29 vs 54ETR +25
- Quality40 vs 30EIX +10
3 of 6 evidence groups favor EIX. EIX’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; ETR keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No new signals fired.
EIX's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — EIX and ETR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
EIX (Edison International): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
ETR (Entergy Corporation): the counter-case, on momentum, risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EIXEIX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ETRETR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EIXEIX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 34 points.
Momentum
ETRETR on the Momentum factor, by 25 points.
Lower downside
ETRETR on Risk Resilience, by 25 points.
Analyst upside
EIXEIX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | EIX | ETR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +29.9% | +15.1% | EIX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +33% | +33.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EIX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 42 vs 39 |
| Fundamentals | EIXon balance | revenue growth 6.2% vs 10.5%; TTM ROE 22.1% vs 10.4%; gross margin 39.9% vs 38.9%; operating margin 23.2% vs 22.2% — EIX takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | EIX | Value 71 vs 37 |
| Technicals | ETR | Price vs 50-day -21.7% vs -4.1%; vs 200-day -17.1% vs 0.1% |
| Risk Resilience | ETR | Risk Resilience 29 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | EIX | Target upside 29.9% vs 15.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of EIX and ETR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on EIX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10EIX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- EIX +3
- 42 vs 39
- 7 sessions ago
- EIX +4
- 43 vs 39
- 30 sessions ago
- EIX +9
- 49 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- EIX +13
- 59 vs 46
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (4.42%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.87%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
EIX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.32%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.38%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ETR closes the Value gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to EIX's edge.
- 2ETR's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3EIX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate EIX's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
EIX leads on balance| Metric | EIX | ETR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 6.2% | 10.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 0.7% | 25% |
| Gross margin | 39.9% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 23.2% | 22.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 22.1% | 10.4% |
| Debt to equity | 2.48 | 1.88 |
Performance
ETR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | EIX | ETR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.8% | -1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -17.9% | -2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -20.6% | -4.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -20.7% | 1.8% |
| Year to date | -5.4% | 14.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 6.5% | 21.8% |
Technicals
ETR has the stronger structure| Metric | EIX | ETR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 28.8 | 44.2 |
| ADX (14) | 29.8 | 13.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -21.7% | -4.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -17.1% | 0.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 98.6% | 15.7% |
Risk
ETR is the more resilient| Metric | EIX | ETR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.04 | 0.19 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.19 | 0.86 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.18 | 1.26 |
| Max drawdown | -32.8% | -11.3% |
| Current drawdown | -29.4% | -10.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 36.8% | 20.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.2% | -2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, EIX or ETR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, EIX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 42 against ETR's 39. The edge comes from value and quality. ETR is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is EIX or ETR the better buy right now?
EIX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor EIX over ETR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. EIX leads Value by 34 points; ETR leads Momentum by 25 points; ETR leads Risk Resilience by 25 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, EIX or ETR?
Analyst price targets imply +29.9% upside for EIX and +15.1% for ETR, so the Street currently favors EIX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, EIX or ETR?
EIX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. EIX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 34 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, EIX or ETR?
ETR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, EIX or ETR?
ETR on the Momentum factor, by 25 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, EIX or ETR?
ETR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ETR on Risk Resilience, by 25 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is EIX more profitable than ETR?
EIX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 39.9% vs 38.9%; operating margin 23.2% vs 22.2%; ttm roe 22.1% vs 10.4%.
Is EIX's lead over ETR getting stronger or weaker?
EIX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the EIX vs ETR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ETR closes the Value gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to EIX's edge; ETR's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; EIX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate EIX's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about EIX and ETR?
EIX: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. ETR: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on EIX is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ETR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare EIX and ETR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.