EPD vs TRP Stock Comparison
EPD currently leads TRP in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 50 vs 45. The clearest difference is value, while TRP has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between EPD and TRP?
EPD leads the current stock comparison as Enterprise Products Partners L.P., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. vs TC Energy Corporation
EPD leads
EPD leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 9 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors TRP on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support EPD, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
TC Energy Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors EPD over TRP, 50 versus 45 as of Oct 22, 2026. EPD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while TRP holds the stronger momentum profile. EPD also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors TRP. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EPD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. EPD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Enterprise Products Partners L.P. and TC Energy Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare EPD and TRP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value56 vs 27EPD +29
- Momentum53 vs 70TRP +17
- Quality40 vs 36EPD +4
- Risk Resilience53 vs 56Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor EPD. EPD’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; TRP keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +19
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
EPD's lead narrowed by 4 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — EPD and TRP both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
EPD (Enterprise Products Partners L.P.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
TRP (TC Energy Corporation): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EPDEPD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EPDEPD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EPDEPD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points.
Momentum
TRPTRP on the Momentum factor, by 17 points.
Lower downside
EPDEPD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
TRPTRP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors EPD, analyst targets favor TRP. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | EPD | TRP | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +12.4% | +36.4% | TRP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +17% | +32.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | EPD | TRP |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 3.95% | 0.39% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.780 | $2.399 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.160 | $2.447 |
| Years increased | 5 | 2 |
| No cut in window | Yes | No (3) |
| Cohort rank | #1 | not ranked |
EPD grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 3.95% a year against TRP's 0.39%. EPD never reduced its regular dividend in the window; TRP did in 3 years. They are ranked in different cohorts — master limited partnerships and US dividend-paying corporations — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EPD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | EPD | 50 vs 45 |
| Fundamentals | EPDon balance | revenue growth 27% vs -5.9%; EPS growth 23.5% vs 10.5%; TTM ROE 21.2% vs 13.1%; gross margin 13.2% vs 51.5%; operating margin 13% vs 46.1% — EPD takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | EPD | Value 56 vs 27 |
| Technicals | TRP | Price vs 50-day -3.2% vs 1.6%; vs 200-day -0.3% vs -2.5% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 53 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | TRP | Target upside 12.4% vs 36.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of EPD and TRP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on EPD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20EPD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- EPD +5
- 50 vs 45
- 7 sessions ago
- EPD +6
- 45 vs 39
- 30 sessions ago
- EPD +9
- 43 vs 34
- 90 sessions ago
- EPD +18
- 53 vs 35
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jun 25 when EPD moved ahead of TRP.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only EPD
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.87%)
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only TRP
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.35%)
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, MACD Bullish Crossover.
TRP is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.05%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.84%, AIQ +5 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TRP closes the Value gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to EPD's edge.
- 2TRP's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3EPD's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate EPD's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
EPD leads on balance| Metric | EPD | TRP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 27% | -5.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 23.5% | 10.5% |
| Gross margin | 13.2% | 51.5% |
| Operating margin | 13% | 46.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 21.2% | 13.1% |
| Debt to equity | 1.12 | 2.3 |
Performance
EPD leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | EPD | TRP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.6% | 0.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -2.7% | 3.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.9% | -11.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -0.6% | 2.9% |
| Year to date | 15.3% | 12.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 22.2% | 20.1% |
Technicals
TRP has the stronger structure| Metric | EPD | TRP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 63.6 | 66.1 |
| ADX (14) | 23 | 21.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3.2% | 1.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.3% | -2.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 20.8% | 24.3% |
Risk
Split| Metric | EPD | TRP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.29 | -0.07 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.98 | 0.83 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.62 | 1.49 |
| Max drawdown | -10.6% | -18.5% |
| Current drawdown | -7.1% | -12.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 18.5% | 19.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.7% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, EPD or TRP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, EPD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 50 against TRP's 45. The edge comes from value and quality. TRP is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is EPD or TRP the better buy right now?
EPD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor EPD over TRP?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. EPD leads Value by 29 points; TRP leads Momentum by 17 points; EPD leads Quality by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, EPD or TRP?
Analyst price targets imply +12.4% upside for EPD and +36.4% for TRP, so the Street currently favors TRP. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors EPD. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, EPD or TRP?
EPD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. EPD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, EPD or TRP?
EPD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, EPD or TRP?
TRP on the Momentum factor, by 17 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, EPD or TRP?
EPD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. EPD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is EPD more profitable than TRP?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 13.2% vs 51.5%; operating margin 13% vs 46.1%; ttm roe 21.2% vs 13.1%. EPD leads on one measure and TRP on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is EPD's lead over TRP getting stronger or weaker?
EPD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-25, when EPD moved ahead of TRP.
What would change the EPD vs TRP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TRP closes the Value gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to EPD's edge; TRP's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; EPD's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate EPD's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about EPD and TRP?
EPD: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. TRP: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on EPD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TRP it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare EPD and TRP with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.