EQX vs EXK Stock Comparison
EQX currently leads EXK in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 48 vs 36. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between EQX and EXK?
EQX leads the current stock comparison as Equinox Gold Corp., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Equinox Gold Corp. vs Endeavour Silver Corp.
EQX leads
EQX leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality. Wall Street currently favors EXK on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support EQX.
Equinox Gold Corp.
Endeavour Silver Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors EQX over EXK, 48 versus 36 as of Oct 31, 2026. EQX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality. EQX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors EXK. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EQX today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. EQX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Equinox Gold Corp. and Endeavour Silver Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare EQX and EXK against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value56 vs 27EQX +29
- Quality60 vs 48EQX +12
- Momentum35 vs 33Even
- Risk Resilience31 vs 32Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor EQX. EQX’s edge is concentrated in value and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
EQX's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — EQX and EXK both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
EQX (Equinox Gold Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
EXK (Endeavour Silver Corp.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EQXEQX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EXKEXK on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EQXEQX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
EXKEXK carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
EXKEXK on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors EQX, analyst targets favor EXK. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | EQX | EXK | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +39.2% | +135.8% | EXK has more room |
| Target dispersion | +7.4% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EQX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | EQX | 48 vs 36 |
| Fundamentals | EQXon balance | revenue growth -10.7% vs 2.1%; EPS growth -25.6% vs -4.3%; TTM ROE 13.7% vs 10.5%; gross margin 39.1% vs 28.3%; operating margin 37.9% vs 25.7% — EQX takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | EQX | Value 56 vs 27 |
| Technicals | EQX | Price vs 50-day -18.1% vs -23.8%; vs 200-day -18.2% vs -18.6% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 31 vs 32 |
| Analyst expectations | EXK | Target upside 39.2% vs 135.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of EQX and EXK and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on EQX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28EQX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- EQX +12
- 48 vs 36
- 7 sessions ago
- EQX +13
- 47 vs 34
- 30 sessions ago
- EQX +13
- 47 vs 34
- 90 sessions ago
- EQX +13
- 59 vs 46
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral
Only EQX
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only EXK
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Death Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Downtrend Structure Active.
EXK is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -4.72%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -7.09%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1EXK closes the Value gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to EQX's edge.
- 2EXK's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3EQX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
EQX leads on balance| Metric | EQX | EXK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -10.7% | 2.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -25.6% | -4.3% |
| Gross margin | 39.1% | 28.3% |
| Operating margin | 37.9% | 25.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 13.7% | 10.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.09 | 0.35 |
Performance
EXK leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | EQX | EXK |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.1% | -4.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.7% | -7.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 11.4% | 2.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -22% | -10.4% |
| Year to date | -25.4% | -15.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -5% | -1.5% |
Technicals
EQX has the stronger structure| Metric | EQX | EXK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.6 | 39.8 |
| ADX (14) | 14.5 | 23.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -18.1% | -23.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -18.2% | -18.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 51.8% | 50.6% |
Risk
Split| Metric | EQX | EXK |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.1 | 3.16 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.2 | 0.31 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.33 | 0.5 |
| Max drawdown | -54% | -47.5% |
| Current drawdown | -44.1% | -43.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 62.2% | 76% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.7% | -7.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, EQX or EXK?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, EQX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 48 against EXK's 36. The edge comes from value and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is EQX or EXK the better buy right now?
EQX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor EQX over EXK?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. EQX leads Value by 29 points; EQX leads Quality by 12 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, EQX or EXK?
Analyst price targets imply +39.2% upside for EQX and +135.8% for EXK, so the Street currently favors EXK. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors EQX. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, EQX or EXK?
EQX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. EQX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, EQX or EXK?
EXK on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, EQX or EXK?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, EQX or EXK?
EXK is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. EXK carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is EQX more profitable than EXK?
EQX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 39.1% vs 28.3%; operating margin 37.9% vs 25.7%; ttm roe 13.7% vs 10.5%.
Is EQX's lead over EXK getting stronger or weaker?
EQX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the EQX vs EXK verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: EXK closes the Value gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to EQX's edge; EXK's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; EQX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about EQX and EXK?
EQX: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral. EXK: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on EQX is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On EXK it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare EQX and EXK with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.