EQX vs GOLD Stock Comparison
EQX currently leads GOLD in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 48 vs 45. The clearest difference is quality, while GOLD has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between EQX and GOLD?
EQX leads the current stock comparison as Equinox Gold Corp., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Equinox Gold Corp. vs Gold.com, Inc.
EQX leads
EQX leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors GOLD on target upside.
Fragile: 0 of 6 evidence groups support EQX.
Equinox Gold Corp.
Gold.com, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors EQX over GOLD, 48 versus 45 as of Oct 31, 2026. EQX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while GOLD holds the stronger risk resilience profile. EQX also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors GOLD. 0 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EQX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. EQX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Equinox Gold Corp. and Gold.com, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare EQX and GOLD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality60 vs 29EQX +31
- Risk Resilience31 vs 53GOLD +22
- Value56 vs 68GOLD +12
- Momentum35 vs 30EQX +5
0 of 6 evidence groups favor EQX. EQX’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; GOLD keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
EQX's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — EQX and GOLD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
EQX (Equinox Gold Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
GOLD (Gold.com, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, value, fundamentals.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EQXEQX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
GOLDGOLD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
GOLDGOLD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points.
Momentum
EQXEQX on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
GOLDGOLD on Risk Resilience, by 22 points.
Analyst upside
GOLDGOLD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors EQX, analyst targets favor GOLD. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | EQX | GOLD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +39.2% | +58.8% | GOLD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +7.4% | +29.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
0 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EQX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 48 vs 45 |
| Fundamentals | GOLDon balance | revenue growth -10.7% vs 59.8%; EPS growth -25.6% vs 3.9%; TTM ROE 13.7% vs 11.5% — GOLD takes 2 of 3 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | GOLD | Value 56 vs 68 |
| Technicals | GOLD | Price vs 50-day -18.1% vs -11.9%; vs 200-day -18.2% vs -12.8% |
| Risk Resilience | GOLD | Risk Resilience 31 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | GOLD | Target upside 39.2% vs 58.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of EQX and GOLD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 0 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on EQX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28EQX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- EQX +3
- 48 vs 45
- 7 sessions ago
- EQX +3
- 47 vs 44
- 30 sessions ago
- EQX +5
- 47 vs 42
- 90 sessions ago
- EQX +7
- 59 vs 52
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Aug 5 when EQX moved ahead of GOLD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral
Only EQX
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.66%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only GOLD
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active.
GOLD is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -4.72%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.35%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1GOLD closes the Quality gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to EQX's edge.
- 2GOLD's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3EQX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
GOLD leads on balance| Metric | EQX | GOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -10.7% | 59.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -25.6% | 3.9% |
| Gross margin | 39.1% | 0.7% |
| Operating margin | 37.9% | -0.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 13.7% | 11.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.09 | 0.84 |
Performance
GOLD leads 3 of 5 windows| Metric | EQX | GOLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.1% | 0.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.7% | -8.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 11.4% | -7.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -22% | -13.6% |
| Year to date | -25.4% | 14.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -5% | — |
Technicals
GOLD has the stronger structure| Metric | EQX | GOLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.6 | 35.2 |
| ADX (14) | 14.5 | 30 |
| Price vs 50-day | -18.1% | -11.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -18.2% | -12.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 51.8% | 28.8% |
Risk
GOLD is the more resilient| Metric | EQX | GOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.2 | 0.75 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.33 | 1.41 |
| Max drawdown | -54% | -41.4% |
| Current drawdown | -44.1% | -39.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 62.2% | 54% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.7% | -4.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, EQX or GOLD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, EQX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 48 against GOLD's 45. The edge comes from quality and momentum. GOLD is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is EQX or GOLD the better buy right now?
EQX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 0 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor EQX over GOLD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. EQX leads Quality by 31 points; GOLD leads Risk Resilience by 22 points; GOLD leads Value by 12 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, EQX or GOLD?
Analyst price targets imply +39.2% upside for EQX and +58.8% for GOLD, so the Street currently favors GOLD. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors EQX. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, EQX or GOLD?
GOLD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. GOLD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, EQX or GOLD?
GOLD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, EQX or GOLD?
EQX on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, EQX or GOLD?
GOLD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. GOLD on Risk Resilience, by 22 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is EQX more profitable than GOLD?
EQX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 39.1% vs 0.7%; operating margin 37.9% vs -0.5%; ttm roe 13.7% vs 11.5%.
Is EQX's lead over GOLD getting stronger or weaker?
EQX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-05, when EQX moved ahead of GOLD.
What would change the EQX vs GOLD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: GOLD closes the Quality gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to EQX's edge; GOLD's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; EQX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about EQX and GOLD?
EQX: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral. GOLD: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on EQX is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On GOLD it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare EQX and GOLD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.