EVRG vs HE Stock Comparison
Compare EVRG and HE across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between EVRG and HE?
EVRG leads the current stock comparison as Evergy, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Evergy, Inc. vs Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
EVRG leads
EVRG leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 4 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support EVRG, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Evergy, Inc.
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors EVRG over HE, 42 versus 41 as of Sep 11, 2026. EVRG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while HE holds the stronger value profile. EVRG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EVRG today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. EVRG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Evergy, Inc. and Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare EVRG and HE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value48 vs 66HE +18
- Momentum41 vs 25EVRG +16
- Quality33 vs 25EVRG +8
- Risk Resilience51 vs 50Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor EVRG. EVRG’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; HE keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
EVRG's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — EVRG and HE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
EVRG (Evergy, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
HE (Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, fundamentals, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 23.8% against 15.2%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EVRGEVRG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HEHE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HEHE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points.
Momentum
EVRGEVRG on the Momentum factor, by 16 points.
Lower downside
EVRGEVRG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | EVRG | HE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.7% | +14.5% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +12.8% | +2.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EVRG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 42 vs 41 |
| Fundamentals | HEon balance | revenue growth 3.9% vs 25.9%; EPS growth 40.9% vs 294.4%; TTM ROE 9.1% vs 13.7%; gross margin 40.1% vs 11.5%; operating margin 25.9% vs 11.5% — HE takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HE | Value 48 vs 66 |
| Technicals | EVRG | Price vs 50-day -2.7% vs -16.2%; vs 200-day 0.8% vs -23.4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 51 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 14.7% vs 14.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of EVRG and HE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on EVRG.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10EVRG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- EVRG +1
- 42 vs 41
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 41 vs 41
- 30 sessions ago
- EVRG +4
- 45 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- EVRG +6
- 51 vs 45
The lead changed hands 10 times in this window, most recently on Aug 31 when EVRG moved ahead of HE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.87%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (10.73%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
HE is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.32%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.86%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1HE closes the Momentum gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to EVRG's edge.
- 2HE's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3EVRG's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate EVRG's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HE leads on balance| Metric | EVRG | HE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.9% | 25.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 40.9% | 294.4% |
| Gross margin | 40.1% | 11.5% |
| Operating margin | 25.9% | 11.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 9.1% | 13.7% |
| Debt to equity | 1.61 | 1.6 |
Performance
EVRG leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | EVRG | HE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.7% | -4.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -2.4% | -12.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1.8% | -19.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 0.4% | -28.9% |
| Year to date | 12.2% | -10.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 15% | -11.9% |
Technicals
EVRG has the stronger structure| Metric | EVRG | HE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.1 | 20.6 |
| ADX (14) | 14.9 | 54.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.7% | -16.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.8% | -23.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 15.2% | 23.8% |
Risk
Split| Metric | EVRG | HE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.04 | 0.41 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.67 | -0.36 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.11 | -0.55 |
| Max drawdown | -8.5% | -39.5% |
| Current drawdown | -7.7% | -38.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 16.3% | 31.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.5% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, EVRG or HE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, EVRG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 42 against HE's 41. The edge comes from momentum and quality. HE is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is EVRG or HE the better buy right now?
EVRG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor EVRG over HE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HE leads Value by 18 points; EVRG leads Momentum by 16 points; EVRG leads Quality by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, EVRG or HE?
Analyst price targets imply +14.7% upside for EVRG and +14.5% for HE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, EVRG or HE?
HE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, EVRG or HE?
HE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, EVRG or HE?
EVRG on the Momentum factor, by 16 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, EVRG or HE?
EVRG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. EVRG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is EVRG more profitable than HE?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 40.1% vs 11.5%; operating margin 25.9% vs 11.5%; ttm roe 9.1% vs 13.7%. EVRG leads on two measures and HE on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is EVRG's lead over HE getting stronger or weaker?
EVRG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 10 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-31, when EVRG moved ahead of HE.
What would change the EVRG vs HE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: HE closes the Momentum gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to EVRG's edge; HE's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; EVRG's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate EVRG's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about EVRG and HE?
EVRG: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. HE: 2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on EVRG is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On HE it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare EVRG and HE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.