EXK vs GOLD Stock Comparison
GOLD currently leads EXK in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 43 vs 36. The clearest difference is value, while EXK has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between EXK and GOLD?
GOLD leads the current stock comparison as Gold.com, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Endeavour Silver Corp. vs Gold.com, Inc.
GOLD leads
GOLD leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors EXK on target upside.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support GOLD, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Endeavour Silver Corp.
Gold.com, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors GOLD over EXK, 43 versus 36 as of Oct 21, 2026. GOLD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while EXK holds the stronger quality profile. GOLD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors EXK. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor GOLD today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. GOLD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Endeavour Silver Corp. and Gold.com, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare EXK and GOLD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value27 vs 68GOLD +41
- Quality48 vs 29EXK +19
- Risk Resilience32 vs 51GOLD +19
- Momentum35 vs 24EXK +11
5 of 6 evidence groups favor GOLD. GOLD’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; EXK keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
GOLD's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — EXK and GOLD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
GOLD (Gold.com, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
EXK (Endeavour Silver Corp.): the counter-case, on quality, momentum, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 58% against 27.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
GOLDGOLD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
GOLDGOLD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
GOLDGOLD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 41 points.
Momentum
EXKEXK on the Momentum factor, by 11 points.
Lower downside
GOLDGOLD on Risk Resilience, by 19 points.
Analyst upside
EXKEXK on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors GOLD, analyst targets favor EXK. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | EXK | GOLD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +104.6% | +55.6% | EXK has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +29.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor GOLD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | GOLD | 36 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | GOLD | revenue growth 2.1% vs 59.8%; EPS growth -4.3% vs 3.9%; TTM ROE 10.5% vs 11.5% |
| Valuation | GOLD | Value 27 vs 68 |
| Technicals | GOLD | Price vs 50-day -15% vs -11.3%; vs 200-day -16.9% vs -14.7% |
| Risk Resilience | GOLD | Risk Resilience 32 vs 51 |
| Analyst expectations | EXK | Target upside 104.6% vs 55.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of EXK and GOLD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on GOLD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20GOLD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- GOLD +7
- 36 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- GOLD +9
- 34 vs 43
- 30 sessions ago
- GOLD +8
- 33 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- GOLD +9
- 47 vs 56
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 4 when GOLD moved ahead of EXK.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only EXK
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only GOLD
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Death Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Downtrend Structure Active.
GOLD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.34%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.65%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1EXK closes the Value gap — currently 41 points behind, the largest single contributor to GOLD's edge.
- 2EXK's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3GOLD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
GOLD leads on balance| Metric | EXK | GOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.1% | 59.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -4.3% | 3.9% |
| Gross margin | 28.3% | 0.7% |
| Operating margin | 25.7% | -0.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.5% | 11.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.35 | 0.84 |
Performance
EXK leads 3 of 5 windows| Metric | EXK | GOLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.5% | -5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -22% | -14.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1.7% | -5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -12.6% | -16.6% |
| Year to date | -12.8% | 12.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -15.6% | — |
Technicals
GOLD has the stronger structure| Metric | EXK | GOLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.4 | 27 |
| ADX (14) | 22.7 | 28.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -15% | -11.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -16.9% | -14.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 58% | 27.8% |
Risk
GOLD is the more resilient| Metric | EXK | GOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.06 | 1.61 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.2 | 0.71 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.31 | 1.36 |
| Max drawdown | -47.5% | -41.4% |
| Current drawdown | -41.9% | -40.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 76.6% | 54.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.4% | -4.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, EXK or GOLD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, GOLD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 43 against EXK's 36. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. EXK is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is EXK or GOLD the better buy right now?
GOLD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor GOLD over EXK?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. GOLD leads Value by 41 points; EXK leads Quality by 19 points; GOLD leads Risk Resilience by 19 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, EXK or GOLD?
Analyst price targets imply +104.6% upside for EXK and +55.6% for GOLD, so the Street currently favors EXK. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors GOLD. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, EXK or GOLD?
GOLD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. GOLD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 41 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, EXK or GOLD?
GOLD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, EXK or GOLD?
EXK on the Momentum factor, by 11 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, EXK or GOLD?
GOLD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. GOLD on Risk Resilience, by 19 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is EXK more profitable than GOLD?
GOLD leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 28.3% vs 0.7%; operating margin 25.7% vs -0.5%; ttm roe 10.5% vs 11.5%.
Is GOLD's lead over EXK getting stronger or weaker?
GOLD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-04, when GOLD moved ahead of EXK.
What would change the EXK vs GOLD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: EXK closes the Value gap — currently 41 points behind, the largest single contributor to GOLD's edge; EXK's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; GOLD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about EXK and GOLD?
EXK: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. GOLD: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on EXK is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On GOLD it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare EXK and GOLD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.