EXR vs GMRE Stock Comparison
Compare EXR and GMRE across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between EXR and GMRE?
GMRE leads the current stock comparison as Global Medical REIT Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Extra Space Storage Inc. vs Global Medical REIT Inc.
GMRE leads
GMRE leads by 16 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors EXR on target upside.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support GMRE, and its lead is widening.
Extra Space Storage Inc.
Global Medical REIT Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors GMRE over EXR, 50 versus 34 as of Sep 11, 2026. GMRE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while EXR holds the stronger quality profile. GMRE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors EXR. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor GMRE today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. GMRE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 16 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Extra Space Storage Inc. and Global Medical REIT Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare EXR and GMRE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value36 vs 60GMRE +24
- Risk Resilience56 vs 78GMRE +22
- Quality31 vs 26EXR +5
5 of 6 evidence groups favor GMRE. GMRE’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; EXR keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
GMRE's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — EXR and GMRE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
GMRE (Global Medical REIT Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
EXR (Extra Space Storage Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
GMREGMRE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
GMREGMRE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
GMREGMRE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
GMREGMRE on Risk Resilience, by 22 points.
Analyst upside
EXREXR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors GMRE, analyst targets favor EXR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | EXR | GMRE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.1% | +11.9% | EXR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +20.4% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor GMRE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | GMRE | 34 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | GMREon balance | revenue growth 2.1% vs 4.4%; EPS growth 9.6% vs 80.8%; TTM ROE 7.1% vs 10.8%; operating margin 43.4% vs 25.5% — GMRE takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | GMRE | Value 36 vs 60 |
| Technicals | GMRE | Price vs 50-day -5.6% vs 1.7%; vs 200-day -3.5% vs 5.5% |
| Risk Resilience | GMRE | Risk Resilience 56 vs 78 |
| Analyst expectations | EXR | Target upside 14.1% vs 11.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of EXR and GMRE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 16 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on GMRE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10GMRE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 16 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- GMRE +16
- 34 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- GMRE +16
- 34 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- GMRE +4
- 44 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- GMRE +4
- 44 vs 48
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.08%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
No active signals
EXR is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.87%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1EXR closes the Value gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to GMRE's edge.
- 2EXR's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3GMRE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
GMRE leads on balance| Metric | EXR | GMRE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.1% | 4.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 9.6% | 80.8% |
| Gross margin | 23% | 0.4% |
| Operating margin | 43.4% | 25.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 7.1% | 10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.09 | 0.97 |
Performance
GMRE leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | EXR | GMRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.5% | -0.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7% | 1.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.8% | 11.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -3.6% | 2.1% |
| Year to date | 4.8% | 6.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -7.2% | -13.7% |
Technicals
GMRE has the stronger structure| Metric | EXR | GMRE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 13.5 | 65.4 |
| ADX (14) | 21.2 | 25.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.6% | 1.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -3.5% | 5.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.6% | 20.6% |
Risk
GMRE is the more resilient| Metric | EXR | GMRE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.32 | 0.04 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.32 | 0.66 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.5 | 0.96 |
| Max drawdown | -16.7% | -22% |
| Current drawdown | -10.7% | -6.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 22.9% | 29.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.3% | -2.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, EXR or GMRE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, GMRE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 50 against EXR's 34. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. EXR is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is EXR or GMRE the better buy right now?
GMRE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor GMRE over EXR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. GMRE leads Value by 24 points; GMRE leads Risk Resilience by 22 points; EXR leads Quality by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, EXR or GMRE?
Analyst price targets imply +14.1% upside for EXR and +11.9% for GMRE, so the Street currently favors EXR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors GMRE. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, EXR or GMRE?
GMRE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. GMRE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, EXR or GMRE?
GMRE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, EXR or GMRE?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, EXR or GMRE?
GMRE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. GMRE on Risk Resilience, by 22 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is EXR more profitable than GMRE?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 23% vs 0.4%; operating margin 43.4% vs 25.5%; ttm roe 7.1% vs 10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is GMRE's lead over EXR getting stronger or weaker?
GMRE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 16 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the EXR vs GMRE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: EXR closes the Value gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to GMRE's edge; EXR's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; GMRE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about EXR and GMRE?
EXR: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. GMRE: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on EXR is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare EXR and GMRE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.