FIVE vs HD Stock Comparison
HD currently leads FIVE in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 58 vs 48. The clearest difference is momentum, while FIVE has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between FIVE and HD?
HD leads the current stock comparison as The Home Depot, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Five Below, Inc. vs The Home Depot, Inc.
HD leads
HD leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors FIVE on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support HD, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Five Below, Inc.
The Home Depot, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HD over FIVE, 58 versus 48 as of Oct 21, 2026. HD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while FIVE holds the stronger risk resilience profile. HD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors FIVE. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. HD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Five Below, Inc. and The Home Depot, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare FIVE and HD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum58 vs 86HD +28
- Value27 vs 37HD +10
- Risk Resilience62 vs 57FIVE +5
- Quality54 vs 55Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor HD. HD’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; FIVE keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +14
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
HD's lead widened by 4 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — FIVE and HD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HD (The Home Depot, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
FIVE (Five Below, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HDHD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HDHD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HDHD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
HDHD on the Momentum factor, by 28 points.
Lower downside
FIVEFIVE on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
FIVEFIVE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors HD, analyst targets favor FIVE. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | FIVE | HD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +25.4% | +18.5% | FIVE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +73% | +28.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 16 | 14 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HD | 48 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | HDon balance | revenue growth -25.6% vs 14.6%; EPS growth -48.4% vs 44.7%; TTM ROE 21.1% vs 102.7%; gross margin 34.8% vs 33.2%; operating margin 11% vs 12.4% — HD takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HD | Value 27 vs 37 |
| Technicals | FIVE | Price vs 50-day -4.1% vs 0.8%; vs 200-day 3.3% vs -6.2% |
| Risk Resilience | FIVE | Risk Resilience 62 vs 57 |
| Analyst expectations | FIVE | Target upside 25.4% vs 18.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of FIVE and HD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20HD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- HD +10
- 48 vs 58
- 7 sessions ago
- HD +6
- 46 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- HD +4
- 38 vs 42
- 90 sessions ago
- FIVE +11
- 55 vs 44
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Sep 23 when HD moved ahead of FIVE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only FIVE
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.95%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.58%)
2 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only HD
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (7.84%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
HD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.13%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.31%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1FIVE closes the Momentum gap — currently 28 points behind, the largest single contributor to HD's edge.
- 2FIVE's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3HD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HD leads on balance| Metric | FIVE | HD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -25.6% | 14.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -48.4% | 44.7% |
| Gross margin | 34.8% | 33.2% |
| Operating margin | 11% | 12.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 21.1% | 102.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.86 | 3.77 |
Performance
FIVE leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | FIVE | HD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4.9% | 7.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.7% | 3.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 9.2% | -4.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -5.6% | -8.4% |
| Year to date | 18.8% | -8.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 47.3% | -18.7% |
Technicals
FIVE has the stronger structure| Metric | FIVE | HD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 54.6 | 80.8 |
| ADX (14) | 22.8 | 26.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.1% | 0.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 3.3% | -6.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 30.5% | 27.1% |
Risk
FIVE is the more resilient| Metric | FIVE | HD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.83 | 0.71 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.07 | -0.85 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.48 | -1.52 |
| Max drawdown | -28.9% | -28.3% |
| Current drawdown | -14.8% | -19.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 38.4% | 26.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | -2.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, FIVE or HD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 58 against FIVE's 48. The edge comes from momentum and value. FIVE is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is FIVE or HD the better buy right now?
HD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HD over FIVE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HD leads Momentum by 28 points; HD leads Value by 10 points; FIVE leads Risk Resilience by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, FIVE or HD?
Analyst price targets imply +25.4% upside for FIVE and +18.5% for HD, so the Street currently favors FIVE. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors HD. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, FIVE or HD?
HD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, FIVE or HD?
HD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, FIVE or HD?
HD on the Momentum factor, by 28 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, FIVE or HD?
FIVE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. FIVE on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is FIVE more profitable than HD?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 34.8% vs 33.2%; operating margin 11% vs 12.4%; ttm roe 21.1% vs 102.7%. FIVE leads on one measure and HD on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is HD's lead over FIVE getting stronger or weaker?
HD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-09-23, when HD moved ahead of FIVE.
What would change the FIVE vs HD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: FIVE closes the Momentum gap — currently 28 points behind, the largest single contributor to HD's edge; FIVE's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; HD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about FIVE and HD?
FIVE: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. HD: 2 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on FIVE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On HD it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare FIVE and HD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.