FOX vs FOXA Stock Comparison
Compare FOX and FOXA across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between FOX and FOXA?
FOX leads the current stock comparison as Fox Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from balanced and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Fox Corporation vs Fox Corporation
FOX leads
FOX leads by 1 AIQ points.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support FOX, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Fox Corporation
Fox Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FOX over FOXA, 58 versus 57 as of Sep 11, 2026. FOX also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FOX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. FOX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Fox Corporation and Fox Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare FOX and FOXA against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value63 vs 61Even
- Risk Resilience59 vs 58Even
- Quality57 vs 57Even
- Momentum52 vs 52Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor FOX. Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No new signals fired.
FOX's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — FOX and FOXA both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FOXFOX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
FOXFOX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
FOXFOX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | FOX | FOXA | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +39.1% | +7% | FOX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +27.1% | +31.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FOX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 58 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 5.5% vs 5.5%; EPS growth 3.2% vs 3.2%; TTM ROE 14.7% vs 14.7%; gross margin 49.4% vs 49.4%; operating margin 24.5% vs 24.5% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 63 vs 61 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day 6.3% vs 7.1%; vs 200-day 1.9% vs 2.8% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 59 vs 58 |
| Analyst expectations | FOX | Target upside 39.1% vs 7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of FOX and FOXA and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FOX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10FOX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- FOX +1
- 58 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- FOX +1
- 57 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- FOX +1
- 66 vs 65
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 54 vs 54
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jul 30 when FOXA moved ahead of FOX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.56%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.07%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
FOX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.67%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.17%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1FOXA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 2FOX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 3A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | FOX | FOXA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Gross margin | 49.4% | 49.4% |
| Operating margin | 24.5% | 24.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 14.7% | 14.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.65 | 0.65 |
Performance
FOXA leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | FOX | FOXA |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.7% | -3.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.9% | -4.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 10% | 12.9% |
| Year to date | -10.6% | -10.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 2.2% | 4.3% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | FOX | FOXA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.2 | 41.4 |
| ADX (14) | 28.3 | 25.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 6.3% | 7.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.9% | 2.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35.4% | 36.3% |
Risk
Split| Metric | FOX | FOXA |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.09 | 0.15 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.33 | 0.37 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.4 | 0.43 |
| Max drawdown | -34.5% | -35.9% |
| Current drawdown | -14.3% | -14.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 33.9% | 35.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -2.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, FOX or FOXA?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FOX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 58 against FOXA's 57. The edge comes from its factor profile. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is FOX or FOXA the better buy right now?
FOX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FOX over FOXA?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. . Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, FOX or FOXA?
Analyst price targets imply +39.1% upside for FOX and +7% for FOXA, so the Street currently favors FOX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, FOX or FOXA?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, FOX or FOXA?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, FOX or FOXA?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, FOX or FOXA?
FOX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. FOX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is FOX more profitable than FOXA?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is FOX's lead over FOXA getting stronger or weaker?
FOX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-07-30, when FOXA moved ahead of FOX.
What would change the FOX vs FOXA verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: FOXA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; FOX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about FOX and FOXA?
FOX: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. FOXA: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on FOX is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On FOXA it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare FOX and FOXA with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.