FOX vs FUBO Stock Comparison
Compare FOX and FUBO across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between FOX and FUBO?
FOX leads the current stock comparison as Fox Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Fox Corporation vs fuboTV Inc.
FOX leads
FOX leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 18 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors FUBO on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support FOX, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Fox Corporation
fuboTV Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FOX over FUBO, 58 versus 46 as of Sep 11, 2026. FOX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while FUBO holds the stronger momentum profile. FOX also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors FUBO. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FOX today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. FOX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Fox Corporation and fuboTV Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare FOX and FUBO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience59 vs 26FOX +33
- Quality57 vs 26FOX +31
- Momentum52 vs 62FUBO +10
- Value63 vs 63Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor FOX. FOX’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; FUBO keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No new signals fired.
FOX's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — FOX and FUBO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
FOX (Fox Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
FUBO (fuboTV Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 56.4% against 35.4%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FOXFOX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
FOXFOX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
FUBOFUBO on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
FOXFOX on Risk Resilience, by 33 points.
Analyst upside
FUBOFUBO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors FOX, analyst targets favor FUBO. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | FOX | FUBO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +39.1% | +264.3% | FUBO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +27.1% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FOX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | FOX | 58 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | FOX | revenue growth 5.5% vs -5.9%; EPS growth 3.2% vs -265.5%; TTM ROE 14.7% vs -9.1%; gross margin 49.4% vs 7.1%; operating margin 24.5% vs -1.5% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 63 vs 63 |
| Technicals | FOX | Price vs 50-day 6.3% vs 16.3%; vs 200-day 1.9% vs -29.5% |
| Risk Resilience | FOX | Risk Resilience 59 vs 26 |
| Analyst expectations | FUBO | Target upside 39.1% vs 264.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of FOX and FUBO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FOX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10FOX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- FOX +12
- 58 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- FOX +10
- 57 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- FOX +18
- 66 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- FOX +13
- 54 vs 41
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.56%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (59.62%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.52%)
FOX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.67%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.05%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1FUBO closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to FOX's edge.
- 2FUBO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3FOX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 12-point move would eliminate FOX's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
FOX leads on balance| Metric | FOX | FUBO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 5.5% | -5.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 3.2% | -265.5% |
| Gross margin | 49.4% | 7.1% |
| Operating margin | 24.5% | -1.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 14.7% | -9.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.65 | 0.5 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | FOX | FUBO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.7% | 1.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.7% | 17.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.9% | 14.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 10% | -18.7% |
| Year to date | -10.6% | -62.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 2.2% | -76.9% |
Technicals
FOX has the stronger structure| Metric | FOX | FUBO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.2 | 58.2 |
| ADX (14) | 28.3 | 21.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 6.3% | 16.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.9% | -29.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35.4% | 56.4% |
Risk
FOX is the more resilient| Metric | FOX | FUBO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.09 | -0.32 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.33 | 0.79 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.4 | 6.3 |
| Max drawdown | -34.5% | -98% |
| Current drawdown | -14.3% | -79.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 33.9% | 1002.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -7.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, FOX or FUBO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FOX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 58 against FUBO's 46. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. FUBO is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is FOX or FUBO the better buy right now?
FOX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FOX over FUBO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. FOX leads Risk Resilience by 33 points; FOX leads Quality by 31 points; FUBO leads Momentum by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, FOX or FUBO?
Analyst price targets imply +39.1% upside for FOX and +264.3% for FUBO, so the Street currently favors FUBO. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors FOX. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, FOX or FUBO?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, FOX or FUBO?
FOX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, FOX or FUBO?
FUBO on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, FOX or FUBO?
FOX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. FOX on Risk Resilience, by 33 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is FOX more profitable than FUBO?
FOX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 49.4% vs 7.1%; operating margin 24.5% vs -1.5%; ttm roe 14.7% vs -9.1%.
Is FOX's lead over FUBO getting stronger or weaker?
FOX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the FOX vs FUBO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: FUBO closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to FOX's edge; FUBO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; FOX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 12-point move would eliminate FOX's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about FOX and FUBO?
FOX: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. FUBO: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on FOX is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On FUBO it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare FOX and FUBO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.