FOX vs NWS Stock Comparison
FOX currently leads NWS in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 51. The clearest difference is value, while NWS has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between FOX and NWS?
FOX leads the current stock comparison as Fox Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Fox Corporation vs News Corporation
FOX leads
FOX leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Value.
Competitive: 2 of 5 evidence groups support FOX, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Fox Corporation
News Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FOX over NWS, 57 versus 51 as of Oct 31, 2026. FOX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while NWS holds the stronger risk resilience profile. FOX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor FOX today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. FOX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Fox Corporation and News Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare FOX and NWS against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value63 vs 36FOX +27
- Risk Resilience61 vs 70NWS +9
- Momentum47 vs 49Even
- Quality57 vs 57Even
2 of 5 evidence groups favor FOX. FOX’s edge is concentrated in value; NWS keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
FOX's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — FOX and NWS both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
FOX (Fox Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
NWS (News Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FOXFOX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
NWSNWS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
FOXFOX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
NWSNWS on Risk Resilience, by 9 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | FOX | NWS | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +53.9% | — | Level |
| Target dispersion | +27.7% | — | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | FOX | NWS |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 3.64% | 0.00% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.460 | $0.200 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.550 | $0.200 |
| Years increased | 5 | 0 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #293 | #349 |
FOX grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 3.64% a year against NWS's 0.00%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor FOX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | FOX | 57 vs 51 |
| Fundamentals | NWSon balance | revenue growth 5.5% vs 7%; EPS growth 3.2% vs 106.3%; TTM ROE 14.7% vs 6.6%; gross margin 49.4% vs 56.9%; operating margin 24.5% vs 11.4% — NWS takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | FOX | Value 63 vs 36 |
| Technicals | NWS | Price vs 50-day -3.6% vs -4.1%; vs 200-day 0.6% vs 5.2% |
| Risk Resilience | NWS | Risk Resilience 61 vs 70 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of FOX and NWS and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FOX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28FOX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- FOX +6
- 57 vs 51
- 7 sessions ago
- FOX +5
- 63 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- FOX +6
- 53 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- FOX +10
- 66 vs 56
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jul 8 when FOX moved ahead of NWS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
FOX and NWS carry the same 4 signals, so the signals do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.83%, AIQ -2 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.37%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NWS closes the Value gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to FOX's edge.
- 2NWS's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3FOX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NWS leads on balance| Metric | FOX | NWS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 5.5% | 7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 3.2% | 106.3% |
| Gross margin | 49.4% | 56.9% |
| Operating margin | 24.5% | 11.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 14.7% | 6.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.65 | 0.34 |
Performance
NWS leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | FOX | NWS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.9% | -3.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.1% | 0.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 7.7% | 0.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -0.5% | 5.8% |
| Year to date | -13.2% | 8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 6.5% | 6.2% |
Technicals
NWS has the stronger structure| Metric | FOX | NWS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 47.7 | 51 |
| ADX (14) | 15.8 | 19.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3.6% | -4.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.6% | 5.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 30.8% | 19.7% |
Risk
NWS is the more resilient| Metric | FOX | NWS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.06 | 0.23 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.19 | 0.12 |
| Max drawdown | -34.5% | -17.7% |
| Current drawdown | -16.8% | -9.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 34.2% | 26.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -2.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, FOX or NWS?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FOX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 57 against NWS's 51. The edge comes from value. NWS is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is FOX or NWS the better buy right now?
FOX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FOX over NWS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. FOX leads Value by 27 points; NWS leads Risk Resilience by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, FOX or NWS?
Analyst price targets imply +53.9% upside for FOX and not covered for NWS. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, FOX or NWS?
FOX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. FOX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, FOX or NWS?
NWS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, FOX or NWS?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, FOX or NWS?
NWS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NWS on Risk Resilience, by 9 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is FOX more profitable than NWS?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 49.4% vs 56.9%; operating margin 24.5% vs 11.4%; ttm roe 14.7% vs 6.6%. FOX leads on two measures and NWS on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is FOX's lead over NWS getting stronger or weaker?
FOX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-08, when FOX moved ahead of NWS.
What would change the FOX vs NWS verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NWS closes the Value gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to FOX's edge; NWS's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; FOX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about FOX and NWS?
FOX: 3 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. NWS: 3 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on FOX is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On NWS it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare FOX and NWS with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.