GDDY vs IT Stock Comparison
GoDaddy Inc. vs Gartner, Inc.
IT leads
IT leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 13 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support IT, and its lead is narrowing.
GoDaddy Inc.
Gartner, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors IT over GDDY, 61 versus 56 as of Sep 5, 2026. IT's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while GDDY holds the stronger momentum profile. IT also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor IT today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. IT lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare GoDaddy Inc. and Gartner, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare GDDY and IT against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%35 vs 64IT +29
- Momentum25%77 vs 59GDDY +18
- Value30%70 vs 72Even
- Risk Resilience15%37 vs 39Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor IT. IT’s edge is concentrated in quality; GDDY keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -7
No new signals fired.
IT's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — GDDY and IT both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
IT (Gartner, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
GDDY (GoDaddy Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ITIT on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
ITIT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
GDDYGDDY on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
ITIT carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
ITIT on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | GDDY | IT | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -13.8% | -10.1% | IT has more room |
| Target dispersion | +27.5% | +51.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor IT. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | IT | 56 vs 61 |
| Fundamentals | ITon balance | revenue growth 2.5% vs 10.9%; EPS growth 14.3% vs 29.8%; TTM ROE 6.6% vs 4%; gross margin 63.8% vs 68.9%; operating margin 25.2% vs 17.3% — IT takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 70 vs 72 |
| Technicals | IT | Price vs 50-day 8.4% vs 13.7%; vs 200-day 5.3% vs 5% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 37 vs 39 |
| Analyst expectations | IT | Target upside -13.8% vs -10.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of GDDY and IT and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on IT.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4IT lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- IT +5
- 56 vs 61
- 7 sessions ago
- IT +8
- 54 vs 62
- 30 sessions ago
- IT +13
- 54 vs 67
- 90 sessions ago
- GDDY +2
- 54 vs 52
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Jul 1 when GDDY moved ahead of IT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.92%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.15%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (8.35%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.62%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
GDDY is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.24%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -4.62%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1GDDY closes the Quality gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to IT's edge.
- 2GDDY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3IT starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate IT's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
IT leads on balance| Metric | GDDY | IT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.5% | 10.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 14.3% | 29.8% |
| Gross margin | 63.8% | 68.9% |
| Operating margin | 25.2% | 17.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 6.6% | 4% |
| Debt to equity | 573.34 | -17.8 |
Performance
GDDY leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | GDDY | IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.7% | -6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 11.2% | 0.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 20.1% | 13.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 7.8% | 10.3% |
| Year to date | -18.4% | -26.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -29.4% | -24.7% |
Technicals
IT has the stronger structure| Metric | GDDY | IT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 67.3 | 55.3 |
| ADX (14) | 16.3 | 28.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 8.4% | 13.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.3% | 5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 50.5% | 49.3% |
Risk
Split| Metric | GDDY | IT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.16 | 0.44 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.62 | -0.23 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.79 | -0.32 |
| Max drawdown | -49.6% | -52.4% |
| Current drawdown | -31.9% | -29.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 46.4% | 55.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.3% | -4.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, GDDY or IT?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, IT is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 61 against GDDY's 56. The edge comes from quality. GDDY is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is GDDY or IT the better buy right now?
IT carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor IT over GDDY?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. IT leads Quality by 29 points; GDDY leads Momentum by 18 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, GDDY or IT?
Analyst price targets imply -13.8% upside for GDDY and -10.1% for IT, so the Street currently favors IT. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, GDDY or IT?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, GDDY or IT?
IT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, GDDY or IT?
GDDY on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, GDDY or IT?
IT is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. IT carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is GDDY more profitable than IT?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 63.8% vs 68.9%; operating margin 25.2% vs 17.3%; ttm roe 6.6% vs 4%. GDDY leads on two measures and IT on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is IT's lead over GDDY getting stronger or weaker?
IT lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-23 and 2026-09-04. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-01, when GDDY moved ahead of IT.
What would change the GDDY vs IT verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: GDDY closes the Quality gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to IT's edge; GDDY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; IT starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate IT's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about GDDY and IT?
GDDY: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. IT: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on GDDY is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On IT it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare GDDY and IT with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.