GENI vs IQ Stock Comparison
Compare GENI and IQ across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between GENI and IQ?
IQ leads the current stock comparison as iQIYI, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Genius Sports Limited vs iQIYI, Inc.
IQ leads
IQ leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from GENI.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support IQ, and the lead recently changed hands.
Genius Sports Limited
iQIYI, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors IQ over GENI, 37 versus 31 as of Sep 11, 2026. IQ's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum. IQ also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor IQ today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. IQ lead: Reversed — GENI led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; IQ now leads by 6.
Compare Genius Sports Limited and iQIYI, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare GENI and IQ against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value48 vs 65IQ +17
- Momentum25 vs 33IQ +8
- Quality24 vs 21Even
- Risk Resilience22 vs 22Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor IQ. IQ’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -13
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +6
No new signals fired.
IQ's lead widened by 4 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — GENI and IQ both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
IQ (iQIYI, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
GENI (Genius Sports Limited): the counter-case, on technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
IQIQ on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
IQIQ on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
IQIQ on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
IQIQ on the Momentum factor, by 8 points.
Lower downside
GENIGENI carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
IQIQ on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | GENI | IQ | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +44.4% | +47% | IQ has more room |
| Target dispersion | +71.1% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor IQ. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | IQ | 31 vs 37 |
| Fundamentals | IQon balance | EPS growth -33.3% vs 1.6%; TTM ROE -25.7% vs -6.4%; gross margin 27.4% vs 17.9%; operating margin -12.6% vs -1.5% — IQ takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | IQ | Value 48 vs 65 |
| Technicals | GENI | Price vs 50-day -5.3% vs -16.5%; vs 200-day -4.1% vs -35.1% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 22 vs 22 |
| Analyst expectations | IQ | Target upside 44.4% vs 47% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of GENI and IQ and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on IQ.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10IQ lead: Reversed — GENI led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; IQ now leads by 6.
- Today
- IQ +6
- 31 vs 37
- 7 sessions ago
- GENI +4
- 39 vs 35
- 30 sessions ago
- GENI +5
- 41 vs 36
- 90 sessions ago
- IQ +2
- 36 vs 38
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 9 when IQ moved ahead of GENI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.77%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (26.50%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (7.27%)
GENI is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.49%, AIQ -3 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.68%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1GENI closes the Value gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to IQ's edge.
- 2GENI's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3IQ starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
IQ leads on balance| Metric | GENI | IQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4% | 0.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -33.3% | 1.6% |
| Gross margin | 27.4% | 17.9% |
| Operating margin | -12.6% | -1.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -25.7% | -6.4% |
| Debt to equity | 1.2 | 1.12 |
Performance
GENI leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | GENI | IQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -9.4% | 8.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -12.2% | -29.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1.2% | -9.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 29% | -30.6% |
| Year to date | -39% | -51.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -47.4% | -65.6% |
Technicals
GENI has the stronger structure| Metric | GENI | IQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 30.9 | 40.1 |
| ADX (14) | 18.6 | 45 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.3% | -16.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -4.1% | -35.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 62.6% | 75.9% |
Risk
Split| Metric | GENI | IQ |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.49 | 1.31 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.62 | -2.03 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.94 | -3.4 |
| Max drawdown | -70.8% | -69.2% |
| Current drawdown | -50% | -66.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 70.3% | 49.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.1% | -5.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, GENI or IQ?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, IQ is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 37 against GENI's 31. The edge comes from value and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is GENI or IQ the better buy right now?
IQ carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor IQ over GENI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. IQ leads Value by 17 points; IQ leads Momentum by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, GENI or IQ?
Analyst price targets imply +44.4% upside for GENI and +47% for IQ, so the Street currently favors IQ. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, GENI or IQ?
IQ is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. IQ on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, GENI or IQ?
IQ on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, GENI or IQ?
IQ on the Momentum factor, by 8 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, GENI or IQ?
GENI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. GENI carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is GENI more profitable than IQ?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 27.4% vs 17.9%; operating margin -12.6% vs -1.5%; ttm roe -25.7% vs -6.4%. GENI leads on one measure and IQ on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is IQ's lead over GENI getting stronger or weaker?
IQ lead: Reversed — GENI led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; IQ now leads by 6. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-09, when IQ moved ahead of GENI.
What would change the GENI vs IQ verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: GENI closes the Value gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to IQ's edge; GENI's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; IQ starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about GENI and IQ?
GENI: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. IQ: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on GENI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On IQ it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare GENI and IQ with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.