HBAN vs MAG Stock Comparison
HBAN currently leads MAG in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 59 vs 55. The clearest difference is quality, while MAG has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between HBAN and MAG?
HBAN leads the current stock comparison as Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated vs MAG Silver Corp.
HBAN leads
HBAN leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from MAG.
Fragile: 3 of 5 evidence groups support HBAN, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
MAG Silver Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HBAN over MAG, 59 versus 55 as of Oct 31, 2026. HBAN's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while MAG holds the stronger risk resilience profile. 3 of 5 covered evidence groups favor HBAN today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. HBAN lead: Reversed — MAG led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HBAN now leads by 4.
Compare Huntington Bancshares Incorporated and MAG Silver Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare HBAN and MAG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality56 vs 40HBAN +16
- Risk Resilience84 vs 100MAG +16
- Value56 vs 47HBAN +9
3 of 5 evidence groups favor HBAN. HBAN’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; MAG keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
HBAN's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HBAN and MAG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HBAN (Huntington Bancshares Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
MAG (MAG Silver Corp.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HBANHBAN on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MAGMAG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HBANHBAN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
MAGMAG on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
HBANHBAN on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | HBAN | MAG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +26.4% | -10.1% | HBAN has more room |
| Target dispersion | +25.1% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 5 covered evidence groups favor HBAN. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HBAN | 59 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | MAG | revenue growth -1.3% vs 0%; EPS growth -10.5% vs 17.9%; TTM ROE 8.2% vs 10.3% |
| Valuation | HBAN | Value 56 vs 47 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | MAG | Risk Resilience 84 vs 100 |
| Analyst expectations | HBAN | Target upside 26.4% vs -10.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HBAN and MAG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HBAN.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28HBAN lead: Reversed — MAG led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HBAN now leads by 4.
- Today
- HBAN +4
- 59 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- HBAN +3
- 58 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- MAG +3
- 52 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 56 vs 56
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Aug 3 when HBAN moved ahead of MAG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only HBAN
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.37%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
HBAN leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.19%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MAG closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to HBAN's edge.
- 2MAG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3HBAN's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MAG leads on balance| Metric | HBAN | MAG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.3% | 0% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -10.5% | 17.9% |
| Gross margin | 64.3% | 0% |
| Operating margin | 20% | 0% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8.2% | 10.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0.73 | 0 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | HBAN | MAG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.1% | — |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.9% | — |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.1% | — |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -3.7% | — |
| Year to date | -9.5% | — |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -2.3% | — |
Technicals
Split| Metric | HBAN | MAG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 61.4 | — |
| ADX (14) | 24.5 | — |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.4% | — |
| Price vs 200-day | -6% | — |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.3% | — |
Risk
MAG is the more resilient| Metric | HBAN | MAG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.8 | — |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.02 | — |
| Sortino ratio | 0.02 | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.1% | — |
| Current drawdown | -18.5% | — |
| Annualized volatility | 25.8% | — |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.7% | — |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HBAN or MAG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HBAN is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 59 against MAG's 55. The edge comes from quality and value. MAG is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HBAN or MAG the better buy right now?
HBAN carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HBAN over MAG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HBAN leads Quality by 16 points; MAG leads Risk Resilience by 16 points; HBAN leads Value by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HBAN or MAG?
Analyst price targets imply +26.4% upside for HBAN and -10.1% for MAG, so the Street currently favors HBAN. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HBAN or MAG?
HBAN is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HBAN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HBAN or MAG?
MAG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HBAN or MAG?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HBAN or MAG?
MAG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MAG on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HBAN more profitable than MAG?
MAG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 64.3% vs 0%; operating margin 20% vs 0%; ttm roe 8.2% vs 10.3%.
Is HBAN's lead over MAG getting stronger or weaker?
HBAN lead: Reversed — MAG led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HBAN now leads by 4. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-03, when HBAN moved ahead of MAG.
What would change the HBAN vs MAG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MAG closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to HBAN's edge; MAG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; HBAN's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HBAN and MAG?
HBAN: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. MAG: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HBAN is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare HBAN and MAG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.