HES vs LNG Stock Comparison
Compare HES and LNG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between HES and LNG?
HES leads the current stock comparison as Hess Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Hess Corporation vs Cheniere Energy, Inc.
HES leads
HES leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from LNG. Wall Street currently favors LNG on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 5 evidence groups support HES, and the lead recently changed hands.
Hess Corporation
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HES over LNG, 54 versus 46 as of Sep 11, 2026. HES's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality. Analyst target upside, however, currently favors LNG. 3 of 5 covered evidence groups favor HES today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. HES lead: Reversed — LNG led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HES now leads by 8.
Compare Hess Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare HES and LNG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience57 vs 32HES +25
- Quality75 vs 64HES +11
- Value32 vs 28HES +4
3 of 5 evidence groups favor HES. HES’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No new signals fired.
HES's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HES and LNG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HES (Hess Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HESHES on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
LNGLNG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HESHES on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
HESHES on Risk Resilience, by 25 points.
Analyst upside
LNGLNG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors HES, analyst targets favor LNG. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | HES | LNG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +4% | +8.2% | LNG has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +21.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 5 covered evidence groups favor HES. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HES | 54 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | LNGon balance | revenue growth 26.1% vs -13.8%; EPS growth 2.8% vs 188.2%; TTM ROE 27.4% vs 47.4%; gross margin 78.9% vs 52.9%; operating margin 37% vs 43.5% — LNG takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HES | Value 32 vs 28 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | HES | Risk Resilience 57 vs 32 |
| Analyst expectations | LNG | Target upside 4% vs 8.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HES and LNG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HES.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10HES lead: Reversed — LNG led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HES now leads by 8.
- Today
- HES +8
- 54 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- HES +1
- 54 vs 53
- 30 sessions ago
- LNG +6
- 45 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- LNG +9
- 45 vs 54
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Jun 26 when LNG moved ahead of HES.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
No active signals
3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (11.09%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
LNG is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.18%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1LNG closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to HES's edge.
- 2LNG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3HES starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
LNG leads on balance| Metric | HES | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 26.1% | -13.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 2.8% | 188.2% |
| Gross margin | 78.9% | 52.9% |
| Operating margin | 37% | 43.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 27.4% | 47.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.84 | 4.29 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | HES | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | — | -6.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | — | 3.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | — | 14.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | — | 11% |
| Year to date | — | 42.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | — | 19% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | HES | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | — | 48.8 |
| ADX (14) | — | 21.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | — | 3.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | — | 15.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | — | 30.3% |
Risk
HES is the more resilient| Metric | HES | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | — | -0.58 |
| Sharpe ratio | — | 0.61 |
| Sortino ratio | — | 0.94 |
| Max drawdown | — | -24.3% |
| Current drawdown | — | -6.4% |
| Annualized volatility | — | 28.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | — | -2.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HES or LNG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HES is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 54 against LNG's 46. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HES or LNG the better buy right now?
HES carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HES over LNG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HES leads Risk Resilience by 25 points; HES leads Quality by 11 points; HES leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HES or LNG?
Analyst price targets imply +4% upside for HES and +8.2% for LNG, so the Street currently favors LNG. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors HES. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HES or LNG?
HES is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HES on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HES or LNG?
LNG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HES or LNG?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HES or LNG?
HES is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HES on Risk Resilience, by 25 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HES more profitable than LNG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 78.9% vs 52.9%; operating margin 37% vs 43.5%; ttm roe 27.4% vs 47.4%. HES leads on one measure and LNG on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is HES's lead over LNG getting stronger or weaker?
HES lead: Reversed — LNG led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HES now leads by 8. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-26, when LNG moved ahead of HES.
What would change the HES vs LNG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: LNG closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to HES's edge; LNG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover; HES starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HES and LNG?
HES: No active signals. LNG: 3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. On LNG it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare HES and LNG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.