HII vs HXL Stock Comparison
Compare HII and HXL across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between HII and HXL?
HII leads the current stock comparison as Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. vs Hexcel Corporation
HII leads
HII leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value, but the lead has narrowed from 8 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support HII, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
Hexcel Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HII over HXL, 44 versus 41 as of Sep 11, 2026. HII's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while HXL holds the stronger risk resilience profile. HII also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HII today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. HII lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. and Hexcel Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare HII and HXL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value68 vs 36HII +32
- Risk Resilience50 vs 71HXL +21
- Momentum17 vs 30HXL +13
- Quality40 vs 41Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor HII. HII’s edge is concentrated in value; HXL keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
No new signals fired.
HII's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HII and HXL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HII (Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
HXL (Hexcel Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HIIHII on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HIIHII on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HIIHII on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points.
Momentum
HXLHXL on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
HXLHXL on Risk Resilience, by 21 points.
Analyst upside
HIIHII on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | HII | HXL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +19.5% | +10% | HII has more room |
| Target dispersion | +4.8% | +46.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HII. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 44 vs 41 |
| Fundamentals | HIIon balance | revenue growth 10.3% vs 7%; EPS growth 39.1% vs 32.7%; TTM ROE 12.9% vs 11.4%; gross margin 12.6% vs 24.5%; operating margin 5.2% vs 11.5% — HII takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HII | Value 68 vs 36 |
| Technicals | HXL | Price vs 50-day -6% vs -7.2%; vs 200-day -19% vs 1.9% |
| Risk Resilience | HXL | Risk Resilience 50 vs 71 |
| Analyst expectations | HII | Target upside 19.5% vs 10% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HII and HXL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HII.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10HII lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- HII +3
- 44 vs 41
- 7 sessions ago
- HII +3
- 44 vs 41
- 30 sessions ago
- HII +8
- 49 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- HII +1
- 50 vs 49
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Jul 30 when HII moved ahead of HXL.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (16.82%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (12.46%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
HII leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.7%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.25%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1HXL closes the Value gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to HII's edge.
- 2HXL's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3HII's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate HII's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HII leads on balance| Metric | HII | HXL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 10.3% | 7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 39.1% | 32.7% |
| Gross margin | 12.6% | 24.5% |
| Operating margin | 5.2% | 11.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12.9% | 11.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.55 | 0.74 |
Performance
HXL leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | HII | HXL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.4% | -2.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.8% | -12.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -2.6% | -1.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -31.9% | 6.1% |
| Year to date | -17.2% | 21.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 4.3% | 39.6% |
Technicals
HXL has the stronger structure| Metric | HII | HXL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 27.4 | 29.1 |
| ADX (14) | 27.2 | 35.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6% | -7.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -19% | 1.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 20.9% | 22.3% |
Risk
HXL is the more resilient| Metric | HII | HXL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.84 | 0.97 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.23 | 1.14 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.34 | 2.15 |
| Max drawdown | -40.8% | -18.6% |
| Current drawdown | -37.9% | -18.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 38.4% | 32.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | -2.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HII or HXL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HII is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 44 against HXL's 41. The edge comes from value. HXL is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HII or HXL the better buy right now?
HII carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HII over HXL?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HII leads Value by 32 points; HXL leads Risk Resilience by 21 points; HXL leads Momentum by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HII or HXL?
Analyst price targets imply +19.5% upside for HII and +10% for HXL, so the Street currently favors HII. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HII or HXL?
HII is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HII on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HII or HXL?
HII on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HII or HXL?
HXL on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HII or HXL?
HXL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HXL on Risk Resilience, by 21 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HII more profitable than HXL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 12.6% vs 24.5%; operating margin 5.2% vs 11.5%; ttm roe 12.9% vs 11.4%. HII leads on one measure and HXL on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is HII's lead over HXL getting stronger or weaker?
HII lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-30, when HII moved ahead of HXL.
What would change the HII vs HXL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: HXL closes the Value gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to HII's edge; HXL's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; HII's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate HII's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about HII and HXL?
HII: 1 bullish / 4 bearish, conflicted. HXL: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HII is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On HXL it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare HII and HXL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.