HIMX vs INDI Stock Comparison
Compare HIMX and INDI across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between HIMX and INDI?
HIMX leads the current stock comparison as Himax Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Himax Technologies, Inc. vs indie Semiconductor, Inc.
HIMX leads
HIMX leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from INDI.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support HIMX, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Himax Technologies, Inc.
indie Semiconductor, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HIMX over INDI, 41 versus 35 as of Sep 11, 2026. HIMX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while INDI holds the stronger value profile. HIMX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HIMX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. HIMX lead: Reversed — INDI led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HIMX now leads by 6.
Compare Himax Technologies, Inc. and indie Semiconductor, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare HIMX and INDI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum50 vs 25HIMX +25
- Quality38 vs 18HIMX +20
- Value42 vs 62INDI +20
- Risk Resilience31 vs 30Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor HIMX. HIMX’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; INDI keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -12
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
HIMX's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HIMX and INDI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HIMX (Himax Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
INDI (indie Semiconductor, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 81.7% against 40.5%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HIMXHIMX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HIMXHIMX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
INDIINDI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
HIMXHIMX on the Momentum factor, by 25 points.
Lower downside
HIMXHIMX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
HIMXHIMX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | HIMX | INDI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +191.9% | +45.7% | HIMX has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +5.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HIMX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HIMX | 41 vs 35 |
| Fundamentals | HIMXon balance | revenue growth 14.2% vs 15.4%; EPS growth 139.1% vs 22.7%; TTM ROE 3.9% vs -44.8%; gross margin 31.1% vs 21.5%; operating margin 5% vs -62.7% — HIMX takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | INDI | Value 42 vs 62 |
| Technicals | HIMX | Price vs 50-day 6.8% vs -13.1%; vs 200-day 16% vs -13% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 31 vs 30 |
| Analyst expectations | HIMX | Target upside 191.9% vs 45.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HIMX and INDI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HIMX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10HIMX lead: Reversed — INDI led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HIMX now leads by 6.
- Today
- HIMX +6
- 41 vs 35
- 7 sessions ago
- HIMX +2
- 37 vs 35
- 30 sessions ago
- INDI +4
- 42 vs 46
- 90 sessions ago
- INDI +4
- 36 vs 40
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when HIMX moved ahead of INDI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (16.16%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.67%)
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.34%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
INDI is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +6.89%, AIQ -3 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.21%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INDI closes the Momentum gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to HIMX's edge.
- 2INDI's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3HIMX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HIMX leads on balance| Metric | HIMX | INDI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 14.2% | 15.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 139.1% | 22.7% |
| Gross margin | 31.1% | 21.5% |
| Operating margin | 5% | -62.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 3.9% | -44.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.66 | 1.46 |
Performance
HIMX leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | HIMX | INDI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.1% | -7.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -8.7% | -17.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -15.1% | -16% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 50.6% | 27.8% |
| Year to date | 68.3% | -6.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 63.5% | -21.9% |
Technicals
HIMX has the stronger structure| Metric | HIMX | INDI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 51.9 | 29.8 |
| ADX (14) | 10.9 | 11.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | 6.8% | -13.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 16% | -13% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 40.5% | 81.7% |
Risk
Split| Metric | HIMX | INDI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.75 | 2.77 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.97 | 0.14 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.64 | 0.26 |
| Max drawdown | -51.9% | -59.3% |
| Current drawdown | -43% | -44.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 77.1% | 86% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7% | -7.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HIMX or INDI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HIMX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 41 against INDI's 35. The edge comes from momentum and quality. INDI is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HIMX or INDI the better buy right now?
HIMX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HIMX over INDI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HIMX leads Momentum by 25 points; HIMX leads Quality by 20 points; INDI leads Value by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HIMX or INDI?
Analyst price targets imply +191.9% upside for HIMX and +45.7% for INDI, so the Street currently favors HIMX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HIMX or INDI?
INDI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. INDI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HIMX or INDI?
HIMX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HIMX or INDI?
HIMX on the Momentum factor, by 25 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HIMX or INDI?
HIMX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HIMX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HIMX more profitable than INDI?
HIMX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 31.1% vs 21.5%; operating margin 5% vs -62.7%; ttm roe 3.9% vs -44.8%.
Is HIMX's lead over INDI getting stronger or weaker?
HIMX lead: Reversed — INDI led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HIMX now leads by 6. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 8 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when HIMX moved ahead of INDI.
What would change the HIMX vs INDI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INDI closes the Momentum gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to HIMX's edge; INDI's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; HIMX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HIMX and INDI?
HIMX: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. INDI: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HIMX is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On INDI it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare HIMX and INDI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.