HLNE vs HRB Stock Comparison
Compare HLNE and HRB across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between HLNE and HRB?
HLNE leads the current stock comparison as Hamilton Lane Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Hamilton Lane Incorporated vs H&R Block, Inc.
HLNE leads
HLNE leads by 17 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 6 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support HLNE, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
H&R Block, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HLNE over HRB, 54 versus 37 as of Sep 11, 2026. HLNE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while HRB holds the stronger value profile. HLNE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HLNE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. HLNE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 17 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Hamilton Lane Incorporated and H&R Block, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare HLNE and HRB against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality85 vs 27HLNE +58
- Risk Resilience63 vs 31HLNE +32
- Value35 vs 57HRB +22
- Momentum35 vs 27HLNE +8
4 of 6 evidence groups favor HLNE. HLNE’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; HRB keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +5
No new signals fired.
HLNE's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HLNE and HRB both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HLNE (Hamilton Lane Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
HRB (H&R Block, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HLNEHLNE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HLNEHLNE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HRBHRB on the peer-relative Value factor, by 22 points.
Momentum
HLNEHLNE on the Momentum factor, by 8 points.
Lower downside
HLNEHLNE on Risk Resilience, by 32 points.
Analyst upside
HLNEHLNE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | HLNE | HRB | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +42.2% | +3.1% | HLNE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +64.5% | +58.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HLNE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HLNE | 54 vs 37 |
| Fundamentals | HLNE | revenue growth 42.2% vs -52.3%; EPS growth 22.8% vs -65.3%; TTM ROE 31% vs -229.1%; gross margin 69.9% vs 60.4%; operating margin 43.6% vs 25.8% |
| Valuation | HRB | Value 35 vs 57 |
| Technicals | HRB | Price vs 50-day 1.6% vs -2.1%; vs 200-day -9.7% vs 15.9% |
| Risk Resilience | HLNE | Risk Resilience 63 vs 31 |
| Analyst expectations | HLNE | Target upside 42.2% vs 3.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HLNE and HRB and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 17 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HLNE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10HLNE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 17 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- HLNE +17
- 54 vs 37
- 7 sessions ago
- HLNE +17
- 60 vs 43
- 30 sessions ago
- HLNE +6
- 63 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- HRB +3
- 55 vs 58
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Jul 14 when HLNE moved ahead of HRB.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (12.37%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
4 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (19.04%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
HLNE leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.2%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.53%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1HRB closes the Quality gap — currently 58 points behind, the largest single contributor to HLNE's edge.
- 2HRB's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3HLNE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HLNE leads on balance| Metric | HLNE | HRB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 42.2% | -52.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 22.8% | -65.3% |
| Gross margin | 69.9% | 60.4% |
| Operating margin | 43.6% | 25.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 31% | -229.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.39 | 17.89 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | HLNE | HRB |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -7.1% | -11.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.3% | -17.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 22.7% | 20.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -2.4% | 47.3% |
| Year to date | -28.7% | 3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -35.6% | -13.8% |
Technicals
HRB has the stronger structure| Metric | HLNE | HRB |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 32.6 | 12.5 |
| ADX (14) | 27.5 | 31.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.6% | -2.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.7% | 15.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 37.8% | 39.3% |
Risk
HLNE is the more resilient| Metric | HLNE | HRB |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.17 | -0.26 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.92 | -0.15 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.39 | -0.28 |
| Max drawdown | -52% | -46.1% |
| Current drawdown | -37.7% | -17.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 42.2% | 47.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.6% | -3.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HLNE or HRB?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HLNE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 54 against HRB's 37. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. HRB is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HLNE or HRB the better buy right now?
HLNE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HLNE over HRB?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HLNE leads Quality by 58 points; HLNE leads Risk Resilience by 32 points; HRB leads Value by 22 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HLNE or HRB?
Analyst price targets imply +42.2% upside for HLNE and +3.1% for HRB, so the Street currently favors HLNE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HLNE or HRB?
HRB is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HRB on the peer-relative Value factor, by 22 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HLNE or HRB?
HLNE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HLNE or HRB?
HLNE on the Momentum factor, by 8 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HLNE or HRB?
HLNE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HLNE on Risk Resilience, by 32 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HLNE more profitable than HRB?
HLNE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 69.9% vs 60.4%; operating margin 43.6% vs 25.8%; ttm roe 31% vs -229.1%.
Is HLNE's lead over HRB getting stronger or weaker?
HLNE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 17 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-14, when HLNE moved ahead of HRB.
What would change the HLNE vs HRB verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: HRB closes the Quality gap — currently 58 points behind, the largest single contributor to HLNE's edge; HRB's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; HLNE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HLNE and HRB?
HLNE: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. HRB: 4 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HLNE is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On HRB it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare HLNE and HRB with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.