HON vs IR Stock Comparison
HON currently leads IR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 70 vs 47. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between HON and IR?
HON leads the current stock comparison as Honeywell International Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Honeywell International Inc. vs Ingersoll Rand Inc.
HON leads
HON leads by 23 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 8 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support HON, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Honeywell International Inc.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HON over IR, 70 versus 47 as of Oct 31, 2026. HON's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality. HON also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HON today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has swung materially session to session. HON lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 23 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Honeywell International Inc. and Ingersoll Rand Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare HON and IR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum76 vs 31HON +45
- Quality72 vs 49HON +23
- Value66 vs 53HON +13
- Risk Resilience63 vs 61Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor HON. HON’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
HON's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HON and IR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HON (Honeywell International Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
IR (Ingersoll Rand Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 30% against 16.4%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HONHON on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
IRIR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HONHON on the peer-relative Value factor, by 13 points.
Momentum
HONHON on the Momentum factor, by 45 points.
Lower downside
HONHON carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
HONHON on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | HON | IR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +18% | +6.9% | HON has more room |
| Target dispersion | +47.8% | +15.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 13 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 5.09% | -31.49% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $3.421 | $0.530 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $4.385 | $0.080 |
| Years increased | 5 | 1 |
| No cut in window | Yes | No (1) |
| Cohort rank | #251 | not ranked |
HON grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 5.09% a year against IR's -31.49%. HON never reduced its regular dividend in the window; IR did in 1 year. They are ranked in different cohorts — US dividend-paying corporations and variable-dividend payers — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HON. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HON | 70 vs 47 |
| Fundamentals | IRon balance | revenue growth -48.6% vs 10.9%; EPS growth -88.3% vs 34.7%; TTM ROE 36.2% vs 9.5%; gross margin 38% vs 37.9%; operating margin 13.3% vs 21.5% — IR takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HON | Value 66 vs 53 |
| Technicals | HON | Price vs 50-day 3.2% vs 4.9%; vs 200-day -2.3% vs -7.1% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 63 vs 61 |
| Analyst expectations | HON | Target upside 18% vs 6.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HON and IR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 23 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HON.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28HON lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 23 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- HON +23
- 70 vs 47
- 7 sessions ago
- HON +21
- 67 vs 46
- 30 sessions ago
- HON +8
- 62 vs 54
- 90 sessions ago
- HON +9
- 54 vs 45
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only HON
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
Only IR
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Death Cross Active.
HON leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.72%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.05%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1IR closes the Momentum gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to HON's edge.
- 2IR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3HON's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
IR leads on balance| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -48.6% | 10.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -88.3% | 34.7% |
| Gross margin | 38% | 37.9% |
| Operating margin | 13.3% | 21.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 36.2% | 9.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.73 | 0.47 |
Performance
HON leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.1% | -4.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.9% | 0.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -9.4% | -10.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 4.3% | -2.6% |
| Year to date | 12.4% | -4.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 7.6% | -5.4% |
Technicals
HON has the stronger structure| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 75.4 | 38.9 |
| ADX (14) | 11 | 19.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.2% | 4.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -2.3% | -7.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 16.4% | 30% |
Risk
Split| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.74 | 1.24 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.29 | -0.09 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.47 | -0.15 |
| Max drawdown | -19.1% | -30.6% |
| Current drawdown | -11.9% | -23.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 25.3% | 33% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.5% | -3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HON or IR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HON is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 70 against IR's 47. The edge comes from momentum and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HON or IR the better buy right now?
HON carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HON over IR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HON leads Momentum by 45 points; HON leads Quality by 23 points; HON leads Value by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HON or IR?
Analyst price targets imply +18% upside for HON and +6.9% for IR, so the Street currently favors HON. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HON or IR?
HON is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HON on the peer-relative Value factor, by 13 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HON or IR?
IR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HON or IR?
HON on the Momentum factor, by 45 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HON or IR?
HON is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HON carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HON more profitable than IR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 38% vs 37.9%; operating margin 13.3% vs 21.5%; ttm roe 36.2% vs 9.5%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is HON's lead over IR getting stronger or weaker?
HON lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 23 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the HON vs IR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: IR closes the Momentum gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to HON's edge; IR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; HON's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HON and IR?
HON: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. IR: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HON is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On IR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare HON and IR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.