HPE vs HPQ Stock Comparison
HPQ currently leads HPE in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 53 vs 45. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between HPE and HPQ?
HPQ leads the current stock comparison as HP Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company vs HP Inc.
HPQ leads
HPQ leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from HPE. Wall Street currently favors HPE on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support HPQ, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
HP Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HPQ over HPE, 53 versus 45 as of Oct 21, 2026. HPQ's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience. HPQ also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors HPE. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HPQ today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. HPQ lead: Reversed — HPE led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HPQ now leads by 8.
Compare Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and HP Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare HPE and HPQ against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum32 vs 48HPQ +16
- Risk Resilience35 vs 47HPQ +12
- Value68 vs 74HPQ +6
- Quality38 vs 39Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor HPQ. HPQ’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
HPQ's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HPE and HPQ both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HPQ (HP Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company): the counter-case, on fundamentals, technicals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 62.1% against 37.9%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HPQHPQ on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
HPQHPQ on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
HPQHPQ on the Momentum factor, by 16 points.
Lower downside
HPQHPQ on Risk Resilience, by 12 points.
Analyst upside
HPEHPE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors HPQ, analyst targets favor HPE. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | HPE | HPQ | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.9% | -22.7% | HPE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +79.3% | +66.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 17 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | HPE | HPQ |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 2.10% | 10.10% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.480 | $0.722 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.533 | $1.168 |
| Years increased | 3 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #325 | #98 |
HPQ grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 10.10% a year against HPE's 2.10%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HPQ. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HPQ | 45 vs 53 |
| Fundamentals | HPEon balance | revenue growth 14.8% vs 8.8%; EPS growth 40.6% vs 46.9%; TTM ROE 6.1% vs -7.3%; gross margin 32.9% vs 19.8%; operating margin 6.6% vs 5.6% — HPE takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HPQ | Value 68 vs 74 |
| Technicals | HPE | Price vs 50-day -2.2% vs 0.1%; vs 200-day 42.5% vs 29.5% |
| Risk Resilience | HPQ | Risk Resilience 35 vs 47 |
| Analyst expectations | HPE | Target upside 14.9% vs -22.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HPE and HPQ and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HPQ.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20HPQ lead: Reversed — HPE led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HPQ now leads by 8.
- Today
- HPQ +8
- 45 vs 53
- 7 sessions ago
- HPQ +5
- 47 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- HPE +1
- 54 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- HPE +1
- 57 vs 56
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Oct 15 when HPQ moved ahead of HPE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only HPE
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only HPQ
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
HPQ leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +3.71%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.35%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1HPE closes the Momentum gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to HPQ's edge.
- 2HPE's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3HPQ's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HPE leads on balance| Metric | HPE | HPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 14.8% | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 40.6% | 46.9% |
| Gross margin | 32.9% | 19.8% |
| Operating margin | 6.6% | 5.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 6.1% | -7.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0.84 | -112.38 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | HPE | HPQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -17.5% | 1.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -8.1% | -2.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 16.5% | 24.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 95% | 48% |
| Year to date | 133.5% | 40.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 149.3% | 14.7% |
Technicals
HPE has the stronger structure| Metric | HPE | HPQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 38.2 | 49.6 |
| ADX (14) | 26.4 | 14 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.2% | 0.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 42.5% | 29.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 62.1% | 37.9% |
Risk
HPQ is the more resilient| Metric | HPE | HPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.08 | 0.64 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.76 | 0.43 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.02 | 0.82 |
| Max drawdown | -26.6% | -35.4% |
| Current drawdown | -23.6% | -12% |
| Annualized volatility | 58% | 45.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.6% | -4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HPE or HPQ?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HPQ is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 53 against HPE's 45. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HPE or HPQ the better buy right now?
HPQ carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HPQ over HPE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HPQ leads Momentum by 16 points; HPQ leads Risk Resilience by 12 points; HPQ leads Value by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HPE or HPQ?
Analyst price targets imply +14.9% upside for HPE and -22.7% for HPQ, so the Street currently favors HPE. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors HPQ. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HPE or HPQ?
HPQ is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HPQ on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HPE or HPQ?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HPE or HPQ?
HPQ on the Momentum factor, by 16 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HPE or HPQ?
HPQ is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HPQ on Risk Resilience, by 12 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HPE more profitable than HPQ?
HPE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 32.9% vs 19.8%; operating margin 6.6% vs 5.6%; ttm roe 6.1% vs -7.3%.
Is HPQ's lead over HPE getting stronger or weaker?
HPQ lead: Reversed — HPE led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HPQ now leads by 8. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-15, when HPQ moved ahead of HPE.
What would change the HPE vs HPQ verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: HPE closes the Momentum gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to HPQ's edge; HPE's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; HPQ's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HPE and HPQ?
HPE: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. HPQ: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HPE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On HPQ it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare HPE and HPQ with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.