HPE vs PSTG Stock Comparison
PSTG currently leads HPE in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 45. The clearest difference is risk resilience, while HPE has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between HPE and PSTG?
PSTG leads the current stock comparison as Pure Storage Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company vs Pure Storage Inc.
PSTG leads
PSTG leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors HPE on target upside.
Competitive: 2 of 6 evidence groups support PSTG, and its lead is widening.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Pure Storage Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PSTG over HPE, 57 versus 45 as of Oct 21, 2026. PSTG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while HPE holds the stronger value profile. PSTG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors HPE. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PSTG today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. PSTG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Pure Storage Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare HPE and PSTG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience35 vs 73PSTG +38
- Quality38 vs 75PSTG +37
- Value68 vs 31HPE +37
2 of 6 evidence groups favor PSTG. PSTG’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; HPE keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
PSTG's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HPE and PSTG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PSTG (Pure Storage Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company): the counter-case, on value, valuation, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 62.1% against 48.7%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PSTGPSTG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HPEHPE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HPEHPE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 37 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
PSTGPSTG on Risk Resilience, by 38 points.
Analyst upside
HPEHPE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors PSTG, analyst targets favor HPE. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | HPE | PSTG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.9% | +0.9% | HPE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +79.3% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 17 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PSTG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PSTG | 45 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth 40.6% vs -75.8%; TTM ROE 6.1% vs 17.4%; gross margin 32.9% vs 69.7%; operating margin 6.6% vs 5.3% |
| Valuation | HPE | Value 68 vs 31 |
| Technicals | HPE | Price vs 50-day -2.2% vs 32.1%; vs 200-day 42.5% vs -5.7% |
| Risk Resilience | PSTG | Risk Resilience 35 vs 73 |
| Analyst expectations | HPE | Target upside 14.9% vs 0.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HPE and PSTG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PSTG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20PSTG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PSTG +12
- 45 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- PSTG +10
- 47 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- PSTG +3
- 54 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- HPE +1
- 57 vs 56
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Aug 19 when PSTG moved ahead of HPE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only HPE
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (51.03%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.70%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
HPE is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +3.71%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1HPE closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to PSTG's edge.
- 2HPE's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3PSTG starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | HPE | PSTG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 14.8% | -0.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 40.6% | -75.8% |
| Gross margin | 32.9% | 69.7% |
| Operating margin | 6.6% | 5.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 6.1% | 17.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.84 | 0.15 |
Performance
HPE leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | HPE | PSTG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -17.5% | 12.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -8.1% | 5.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 16.5% | -3.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 95% | -26.7% |
| Year to date | 133.5% | 1.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 149.3% | 63.7% |
Technicals
HPE has the stronger structure| Metric | HPE | PSTG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 38.2 | 62.7 |
| ADX (14) | 26.4 | 14.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.2% | 32.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 42.5% | -5.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 62.1% | 48.7% |
Risk
PSTG is the more resilient| Metric | HPE | PSTG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.08 | 2.36 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.76 | -0.39 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.02 | -0.43 |
| Max drawdown | -26.6% | -42.3% |
| Current drawdown | -23.6% | -31.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 58% | 63.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.6% | -5.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HPE or PSTG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PSTG is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 57 against HPE's 45. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. HPE is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HPE or PSTG the better buy right now?
PSTG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PSTG over HPE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PSTG leads Risk Resilience by 38 points; PSTG leads Quality by 37 points; HPE leads Value by 37 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HPE or PSTG?
Analyst price targets imply +14.9% upside for HPE and +0.9% for PSTG, so the Street currently favors HPE. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors PSTG. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HPE or PSTG?
HPE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HPE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 37 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HPE or PSTG?
HPE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HPE or PSTG?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HPE or PSTG?
PSTG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PSTG on Risk Resilience, by 38 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HPE more profitable than PSTG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 32.9% vs 69.7%; operating margin 6.6% vs 5.3%; ttm roe 6.1% vs 17.4%. HPE leads on one measure and PSTG on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is PSTG's lead over HPE getting stronger or weaker?
PSTG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-19, when PSTG moved ahead of HPE.
What would change the HPE vs PSTG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: HPE closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to PSTG's edge; HPE's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; PSTG starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HPE and PSTG?
HPE: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PSTG: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HPE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare HPE and PSTG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.