HYLN vs NEE Stock Comparison
Compare HYLN and NEE across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between HYLN and NEE?
HYLN leads the current stock comparison as Hyliion Holdings Corp., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Hyliion Holdings Corp. vs NextEra Energy, Inc.
HYLN leads
HYLN leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from NEE.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support HYLN, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Hyliion Holdings Corp.
NextEra Energy, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HYLN over NEE, 44 versus 42 as of Sep 11, 2026. HYLN's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum, while NEE holds the stronger quality profile. HYLN also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HYLN today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. HYLN lead: Reversed — NEE led by 12 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HYLN now leads by 2.
Compare Hyliion Holdings Corp. and NextEra Energy, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare HYLN and NEE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum75 vs 30HYLN +45
- Quality30 vs 48NEE +18
- Risk Resilience40 vs 56NEE +16
- Value34 vs 38NEE +4
2 of 6 evidence groups favor HYLN. HYLN’s edge is concentrated in momentum; NEE keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No new signals fired.
HYLN's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HYLN and NEE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HYLN (Hyliion Holdings Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
NEE (NextEra Energy, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience, value.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HYLNHYLN on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HYLNHYLN on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NEENEE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
HYLNHYLN on the Momentum factor, by 45 points.
Lower downside
NEENEE on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
HYLNHYLN on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | HYLN | NEE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +143.6% | +26.8% | HYLN has more room |
| Target dispersion | +10.5% | +25.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HYLN. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 44 vs 42 |
| Fundamentals | NEEon balance | revenue growth 74.6% vs 8.3%; EPS growth -14.3% vs 43.8%; TTM ROE -27.9% vs 16.8%; gross margin -54.4% vs 71.8%; operating margin -6.5% vs 29.5% — NEE takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | NEE | Value 34 vs 38 |
| Technicals | HYLN | Price vs 50-day 2.6% vs -4.5%; vs 200-day 22.9% vs -6.1% |
| Risk Resilience | NEE | Risk Resilience 40 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | HYLN | Target upside 143.6% vs 26.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HYLN and NEE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HYLN.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10HYLN lead: Reversed — NEE led by 12 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HYLN now leads by 2.
- Today
- HYLN +2
- 44 vs 42
- 7 sessions ago
- NEE +6
- 35 vs 41
- 30 sessions ago
- NEE +12
- 38 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- NEE +24
- 33 vs 57
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Sep 9 when HYLN moved ahead of NEE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (22.29%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.81%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
NEE is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.09%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.16%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NEE closes the Momentum gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to HYLN's edge.
- 2NEE's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3HYLN's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NEE leads on balance| Metric | HYLN | NEE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 74.6% | 8.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -14.3% | 43.8% |
| Gross margin | -54.4% | 71.8% |
| Operating margin | -6.5% | 29.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -27.9% | 16.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.02 | 1.93 |
Performance
HYLN leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | HYLN | NEE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 7.3% | -0.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.8% | -3.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -44.8% | -3.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 84.5% | -10.1% |
| Year to date | 107.6% | 2.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 131.5% | 18.2% |
Technicals
HYLN has the stronger structure| Metric | HYLN | NEE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 65.7 | 35.6 |
| ADX (14) | 16.5 | 22.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2.6% | -4.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 22.9% | -6.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 66.2% | 13.2% |
Risk
NEE is the more resilient| Metric | HYLN | NEE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.86 | 0.17 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.29 | 0.69 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.36 | 1.03 |
| Max drawdown | -61.1% | -16.4% |
| Current drawdown | -52.8% | -15.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 104.1% | 21.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -9.1% | -2.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HYLN or NEE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HYLN is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 44 against NEE's 42. The edge comes from momentum. NEE is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HYLN or NEE the better buy right now?
HYLN carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HYLN over NEE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HYLN leads Momentum by 45 points; NEE leads Quality by 18 points; NEE leads Risk Resilience by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HYLN or NEE?
Analyst price targets imply +143.6% upside for HYLN and +26.8% for NEE, so the Street currently favors HYLN. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HYLN or NEE?
NEE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NEE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HYLN or NEE?
HYLN on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HYLN or NEE?
HYLN on the Momentum factor, by 45 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HYLN or NEE?
NEE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NEE on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HYLN more profitable than NEE?
NEE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin -54.4% vs 71.8%; operating margin -6.5% vs 29.5%; ttm roe -27.9% vs 16.8%.
Is HYLN's lead over NEE getting stronger or weaker?
HYLN lead: Reversed — NEE led by 12 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; HYLN now leads by 2. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-09-09, when HYLN moved ahead of NEE.
What would change the HYLN vs NEE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NEE closes the Momentum gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to HYLN's edge; NEE's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; HYLN's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HYLN and NEE?
HYLN: 3 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. NEE: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HYLN is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On NEE it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare HYLN and NEE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.