HYLN vs ORA Stock Comparison
ORA currently leads HYLN in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 36 vs 33. The clearest difference is momentum, while HYLN has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between HYLN and ORA?
ORA leads the current stock comparison as Ormat Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Hyliion Holdings Corp. vs Ormat Technologies, Inc.
ORA leads
ORA leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from HYLN. Wall Street currently favors HYLN on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support ORA, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Hyliion Holdings Corp.
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ORA over HYLN, 36 versus 33 as of Oct 31, 2026. ORA's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while HYLN holds the stronger value profile. ORA also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors HYLN. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ORA today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. ORA lead: Reversed — HYLN led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; ORA now leads by 3.
Compare Hyliion Holdings Corp. and Ormat Technologies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare HYLN and ORA against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum33 vs 50ORA +17
- Value34 vs 26HYLN +8
- Risk Resilience40 vs 48ORA +8
- Quality30 vs 28Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor ORA. ORA’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; HYLN keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
ORA's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HYLN and ORA both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ORA (Ormat Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
HYLN (Hyliion Holdings Corp.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 79.7% against 38.2%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ORAORA on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HYLNHYLN on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HYLNHYLN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
ORAORA on the Momentum factor, by 17 points.
Lower downside
ORAORA on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
HYLNHYLN on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors ORA, analyst targets favor HYLN. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | HYLN | ORA | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +166.8% | +45.2% | HYLN has more room |
| Target dispersion | +34.6% | +39.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ORA. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 33 vs 36 |
| Fundamentals | ORAon balance | revenue growth 74.6% vs -35.9%; EPS growth -14.3% vs -38.9%; TTM ROE -27.9% vs 5%; gross margin -54.4% vs 27.9%; operating margin -6.5% vs 14.9% — ORA takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HYLN | Value 34 vs 26 |
| Technicals | HYLN | Price vs 50-day -12% vs -6.3%; vs 200-day -1.7% vs -18% |
| Risk Resilience | ORA | Risk Resilience 40 vs 48 |
| Analyst expectations | HYLN | Target upside 166.8% vs 45.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HYLN and ORA and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ORA.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28ORA lead: Reversed — HYLN led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; ORA now leads by 3.
- Today
- ORA +3
- 33 vs 36
- 7 sessions ago
- ORA +1
- 31 vs 32
- 30 sessions ago
- HYLN +6
- 36 vs 30
- 90 sessions ago
- HYLN +2
- 33 vs 31
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 15 when ORA moved ahead of HYLN.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only HYLN
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.79%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (7.02%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only ORA
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (16.82%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze.
ORA leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -5.25%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.74%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1HYLN closes the Momentum gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to ORA's edge.
- 2HYLN's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3ORA's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ORA leads on balance| Metric | HYLN | ORA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 74.6% | -35.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -14.3% | -38.9% |
| Gross margin | -54.4% | 27.9% |
| Operating margin | -6.5% | 14.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -27.9% | 5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.02 | 1.31 |
Performance
HYLN leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | HYLN | ORA |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.1% | 2.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -19.2% | 0.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.9% | -5.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 88.3% | -16.9% |
| Year to date | 83.2% | -17% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 47.8% | -13.8% |
Technicals
HYLN has the stronger structure| Metric | HYLN | ORA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 39.4 | 57.1 |
| ADX (14) | 22.3 | 22 |
| Price vs 50-day | -12% | -6.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1.7% | -18% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 79.7% | 38.2% |
Risk
ORA is the more resilient| Metric | HYLN | ORA |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.13 | 0.92 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.9 | -0.31 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.63 | -0.49 |
| Max drawdown | -63.6% | -40.3% |
| Current drawdown | -58.4% | -36.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 102.5% | 37.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -9% | -3.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HYLN or ORA?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ORA is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 36 against HYLN's 33. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. HYLN is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HYLN or ORA the better buy right now?
ORA carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ORA over HYLN?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ORA leads Momentum by 17 points; HYLN leads Value by 8 points; ORA leads Risk Resilience by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HYLN or ORA?
Analyst price targets imply +166.8% upside for HYLN and +45.2% for ORA, so the Street currently favors HYLN. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors ORA. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HYLN or ORA?
HYLN is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HYLN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HYLN or ORA?
HYLN on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HYLN or ORA?
ORA on the Momentum factor, by 17 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HYLN or ORA?
ORA is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ORA on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HYLN more profitable than ORA?
ORA leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin -54.4% vs 27.9%; operating margin -6.5% vs 14.9%; ttm roe -27.9% vs 5%.
Is ORA's lead over HYLN getting stronger or weaker?
ORA lead: Reversed — HYLN led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; ORA now leads by 3. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-15, when ORA moved ahead of HYLN.
What would change the HYLN vs ORA verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: HYLN closes the Momentum gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to ORA's edge; HYLN's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; ORA's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HYLN and ORA?
HYLN: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. ORA: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HYLN is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ORA it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare HYLN and ORA with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.