IDA vs LNT Stock Comparison
Compare IDA and LNT across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between IDA and LNT?
LNT leads the current stock comparison as Alliant Energy Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
IDACORP, Inc. vs Alliant Energy Corporation
LNT leads
LNT leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Value.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support LNT, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
IDACORP, Inc.
Alliant Energy Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors LNT over IDA, 38 versus 37 as of Sep 11, 2026. LNT's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while IDA holds the stronger risk resilience profile. LNT also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LNT today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. LNT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare IDACORP, Inc. and Alliant Energy Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare IDA and LNT against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value39 vs 43LNT +4
- Risk Resilience57 vs 53IDA +4
- Quality33 vs 36Even
- Momentum29 vs 27Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor LNT. LNT’s edge is concentrated in value; IDA keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
No new signals fired.
LNT's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — IDA and LNT both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
LNT (Alliant Energy Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
IDA (IDACORP, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
LNTLNT on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
IDAIDA on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
LNTLNT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
IDAIDA on Risk Resilience, by 4 points.
Analyst upside
LNTLNT on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | IDA | LNT | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +13.3% | +15.3% | LNT has more room |
| Target dispersion | +30% | +11.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LNT. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 37 vs 38 |
| Fundamentals | LNTon balance | revenue growth 16.7% vs -18%; EPS growth 48.4% vs -24.1%; TTM ROE 9.4% vs 11%; gross margin 21.7% vs 42%; operating margin 21.4% vs 22.1% — LNT takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | LNT | Value 39 vs 43 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -5.5% vs -6%; vs 200-day -2.9% vs -3.8% |
| Risk Resilience | IDA | Risk Resilience 57 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | LNT | Target upside 13.3% vs 15.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of IDA and LNT and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on LNT.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10LNT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- LNT +1
- 37 vs 38
- 7 sessions ago
- LNT +2
- 36 vs 38
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 41 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- LNT +2
- 49 vs 51
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Jul 29 when LNT moved ahead of IDA.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.79%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.60%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.07%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.01%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1IDA closes the Value gap — currently 4 points behind, the largest single contributor to LNT's edge.
- 2IDA generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3LNT's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
LNT leads on balance| Metric | IDA | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 16.7% | -18% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 48.4% | -24.1% |
| Gross margin | 21.7% | 42% |
| Operating margin | 21.4% | 22.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 9.4% | 11% |
| Debt to equity | 1.06 | 1.61 |
Performance
IDA leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | IDA | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.2% | -0.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.6% | -4.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.4% | -7.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -3.6% | -5% |
| Year to date | 7% | 3.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 9.6% | 5% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | IDA | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 34.7 | 32.4 |
| ADX (14) | 20.6 | 17.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.5% | -6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -2.9% | -3.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.3% | 12.5% |
Risk
IDA is the more resilient| Metric | IDA | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.02 | -0.09 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.35 | 0.14 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.52 | 0.21 |
| Max drawdown | -12.6% | -13.8% |
| Current drawdown | -12.4% | -13.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 17.5% | 16.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.8% | -1.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, IDA or LNT?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, LNT is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 38 against IDA's 37. The edge comes from value. IDA is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is IDA or LNT the better buy right now?
LNT carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor LNT over IDA?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. LNT leads Value by 4 points; IDA leads Risk Resilience by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, IDA or LNT?
Analyst price targets imply +13.3% upside for IDA and +15.3% for LNT, so the Street currently favors LNT. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, IDA or LNT?
LNT is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. LNT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, IDA or LNT?
IDA on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, IDA or LNT?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, IDA or LNT?
IDA is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. IDA on Risk Resilience, by 4 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is IDA more profitable than LNT?
LNT leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 21.7% vs 42%; operating margin 21.4% vs 22.1%; ttm roe 9.4% vs 11%.
Is LNT's lead over IDA getting stronger or weaker?
LNT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-29, when LNT moved ahead of IDA.
What would change the IDA vs LNT verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: IDA closes the Value gap — currently 4 points behind, the largest single contributor to LNT's edge; IDA generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; LNT's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about IDA and LNT?
IDA: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. LNT: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on IDA is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On LNT it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare IDA and LNT with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.