IDCC vs JLL Stock Comparison
Compare IDCC and JLL across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between IDCC and JLL?
IDCC leads the current stock comparison as InterDigital, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
InterDigital, Inc. vs Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
IDCC leads
IDCC leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 0 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support IDCC, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
InterDigital, Inc.
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors IDCC over JLL, 63 versus 53 as of Sep 11, 2026. IDCC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while JLL holds the stronger value profile. IDCC also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor IDCC today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. IDCC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare InterDigital, Inc. and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare IDCC and JLL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum59 vs 15IDCC +44
- Value50 vs 68JLL +18
- Quality82 vs 69IDCC +13
- Risk Resilience57 vs 54Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor IDCC. IDCC’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; JLL keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
IDCC's lead widened by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — IDCC and JLL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
IDCC (InterDigital, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
JLL (Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated): the counter-case, on value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
IDCCIDCC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
IDCCIDCC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JLLJLL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points.
Momentum
IDCCIDCC on the Momentum factor, by 44 points.
Lower downside
IDCCIDCC carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
IDCCIDCC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | IDCC | JLL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +21.4% | +14.3% | IDCC has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +38.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor IDCC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | IDCC | 63 vs 53 |
| Fundamentals | IDCCon balance | revenue growth 26.7% vs 8.5%; EPS growth 53.9% vs 37.5%; TTM ROE 26.8% vs 13.6%; gross margin 78.7% vs 89.6%; operating margin 43.8% vs 4.8% — IDCC takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | JLL | Value 50 vs 68 |
| Technicals | IDCC | Price vs 50-day 13.8% vs -1.4%; vs 200-day 8.6% vs 4.4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 57 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | IDCC | Target upside 21.4% vs 14.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of IDCC and JLL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on IDCC.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10IDCC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- IDCC +10
- 63 vs 53
- 7 sessions ago
- JLL +1
- 59 vs 60
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 67 vs 67
- 90 sessions ago
- JLL +15
- 55 vs 70
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Sep 8 when IDCC moved ahead of JLL.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.65%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.37%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
IDCC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.07%, AIQ +3 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.41%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1JLL closes the Momentum gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to IDCC's edge.
- 2JLL's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3IDCC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
IDCC leads on balance| Metric | IDCC | JLL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 26.7% | 8.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 53.9% | 37.5% |
| Gross margin | 78.7% | 89.6% |
| Operating margin | 43.8% | 4.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 26.8% | 13.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.33 | 0.34 |
Performance
IDCC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | IDCC | JLL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 5% | -2.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.4% | -5.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 36.4% | 14.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -5.9% | 18.2% |
| Year to date | 8.8% | 1.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 15.5% | 10.5% |
Technicals
IDCC has the stronger structure| Metric | IDCC | JLL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 53.6 | 25 |
| ADX (14) | 25.5 | 32.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | 13.8% | -1.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | 8.6% | 4.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 31.8% | 34.6% |
Risk
Split| Metric | IDCC | JLL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.38 | 0.95 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.42 | 0.38 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.6 | 0.49 |
| Max drawdown | -36.8% | -21.9% |
| Current drawdown | -12.6% | -12.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 49.1% | 35% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.3% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, IDCC or JLL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, IDCC is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 63 against JLL's 53. The edge comes from momentum and quality. JLL is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is IDCC or JLL the better buy right now?
IDCC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor IDCC over JLL?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. IDCC leads Momentum by 44 points; JLL leads Value by 18 points; IDCC leads Quality by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, IDCC or JLL?
Analyst price targets imply +21.4% upside for IDCC and +14.3% for JLL, so the Street currently favors IDCC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, IDCC or JLL?
JLL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JLL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, IDCC or JLL?
IDCC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, IDCC or JLL?
IDCC on the Momentum factor, by 44 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, IDCC or JLL?
IDCC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. IDCC carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is IDCC more profitable than JLL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 78.7% vs 89.6%; operating margin 43.8% vs 4.8%; ttm roe 26.8% vs 13.6%. IDCC leads on two measures and JLL on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is IDCC's lead over JLL getting stronger or weaker?
IDCC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-08, when IDCC moved ahead of JLL.
What would change the IDCC vs JLL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: JLL closes the Momentum gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to IDCC's edge; JLL's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; IDCC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about IDCC and JLL?
IDCC: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. JLL: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on IDCC is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On JLL it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare IDCC and JLL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.