INDI vs LSCC Stock Comparison
indie Semiconductor, Inc. vs Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
LSCC leads
LSCC leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 0 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors INDI on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support LSCC, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
indie Semiconductor, Inc.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors LSCC over INDI, 41 versus 35 as of Sep 5, 2026. LSCC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while INDI holds the stronger value profile. LSCC also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INDI. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LSCC today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. LSCC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare indie Semiconductor, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare INDI and LSCC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%18 vs 64LSCC +46
- Value30%62 vs 24INDI +38
- Risk Resilience15%30 vs 46LSCC +16
- Momentum25%25 vs 29LSCC +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor LSCC. LSCC’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; INDI keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
LSCC's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INDI and LSCC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INDI (indie Semiconductor, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 107.2% against 43.1%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
LSCCLSCC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
INDIINDI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
INDIINDI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points.
Momentum
LSCCLSCC on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
LSCCLSCC on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
INDIINDI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors LSCC, analyst targets favor INDI. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | INDI | LSCC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +35.6% | +33.1% | INDI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +5.1% | +32.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LSCC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | LSCC | 35 vs 41 |
| Fundamentals | LSCCon balance | revenue growth 15.4% vs 17.7%; EPS growth 22.7% vs -12.5%; TTM ROE -44.8% vs 4.9%; gross margin 21.5% vs 67.7%; operating margin -62.7% vs 7.6% — LSCC takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | INDI | Value 62 vs 24 |
| Technicals | LSCC | Price vs 50-day -7.5% vs -9.5%; vs 200-day -8.8% vs 5.5% |
| Risk Resilience | LSCC | Risk Resilience 30 vs 46 |
| Analyst expectations | INDI | Target upside 35.6% vs 33.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INDI and LSCC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on LSCC.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4LSCC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- LSCC +6
- 35 vs 41
- 7 sessions ago
- LSCC +2
- 39 vs 41
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 46 vs 46
- 90 sessions ago
- LSCC +4
- 46 vs 50
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Aug 28 when LSCC moved ahead of INDI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.27%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (18.87%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.33%)
LSCC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.75%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INDI closes the Quality gap — currently 46 points behind, the largest single contributor to LSCC's edge.
- 2INDI's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3LSCC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
LSCC leads on balance| Metric | INDI | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 15.4% | 17.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 22.7% | -12.5% |
| Gross margin | 21.5% | 67.7% |
| Operating margin | -62.7% | 7.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -44.8% | 4.9% |
| Debt to equity | 1.46 | 0.05 |
Performance
LSCC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | INDI | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -14.1% | -5.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 1.2% | -11.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -27.7% | -24.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 35% | 24.7% |
| Year to date | -1.7% | 54.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -20.4% | 70.2% |
Technicals
LSCC has the stronger structure| Metric | INDI | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 18 | 29.2 |
| ADX (14) | 12.3 | 18 |
| Price vs 50-day | -7.5% | -9.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -8.8% | 5.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 107.2% | 43.1% |
Risk
LSCC is the more resilient| Metric | INDI | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.76 | 2.9 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.12 | 1.12 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.22 | 1.78 |
| Max drawdown | -59.3% | -28.1% |
| Current drawdown | -42.2% | -26.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 85.7% | 59.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.3% | -5.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INDI or LSCC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, LSCC is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 41 against INDI's 35. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. INDI is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INDI or LSCC the better buy right now?
LSCC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor LSCC over INDI?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. LSCC leads Quality by 46 points; INDI leads Value by 38 points; LSCC leads Risk Resilience by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INDI or LSCC?
Analyst price targets imply +35.6% upside for INDI and +33.1% for LSCC, so the Street currently favors INDI. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors LSCC. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INDI or LSCC?
INDI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. INDI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INDI or LSCC?
INDI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INDI or LSCC?
LSCC on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INDI or LSCC?
LSCC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. LSCC on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INDI more profitable than LSCC?
LSCC leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 21.5% vs 67.7%; operating margin -62.7% vs 7.6%; ttm roe -44.8% vs 4.9%.
Is LSCC's lead over INDI getting stronger or weaker?
LSCC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-23 and 2026-09-04. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-28, when LSCC moved ahead of INDI.
What would change the INDI vs LSCC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INDI closes the Quality gap — currently 46 points behind, the largest single contributor to LSCC's edge; INDI's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; LSCC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about INDI and LSCC?
INDI: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. LSCC: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on INDI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On LSCC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INDI and LSCC with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.