INTC vs MTDR Stock Comparison
Compare INTC and MTDR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INTC and MTDR?
MTDR leads the current stock comparison as Matador Resources Company, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Matador Resources Company
MTDR leads
MTDR leads by 11 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 18 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support MTDR, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Intel Corp.
Matador Resources Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors MTDR over INTC, 55 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. MTDR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger quality profile. MTDR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MTDR today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. MTDR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 11 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and Matador Resources Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INTC and MTDR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30 vs 61MTDR +31
- Risk Resilience28 vs 52MTDR +24
- Quality39 vs 35INTC +4
- Momentum77 vs 74Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor MTDR. MTDR’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
MTDR's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and MTDR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
MTDR (Matador Resources Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on quality, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 58.9% against 31%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
MTDRMTDR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MTDRMTDR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
MTDRMTDR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 31 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
MTDRMTDR on Risk Resilience, by 24 points.
Analyst upside
MTDRMTDR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | MTDR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -0.1% | +14.9% | MTDR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +136.1% | +55.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MTDR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | MTDR | 44 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | MTDR | revenue growth 18.8% vs 26%; EPS growth -195.9% vs 11.9%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 12.8%; gross margin 38.9% vs 102.7% |
| Valuation | MTDR | Value 30 vs 61 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day 4.2% vs 13.9%; vs 200-day 33.4% vs 18.3% |
| Risk Resilience | MTDR | Risk Resilience 28 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | MTDR | Target upside -0.1% vs 14.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and MTDR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 11 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on MTDR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10MTDR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 11 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- MTDR +11
- 44 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- MTDR +20
- 35 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- MTDR +18
- 38 vs 56
- 90 sessions ago
- MTDR +17
- 33 vs 50
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Jul 1 when MTDR moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (31.44%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
5 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.90%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.61%, AIQ -2 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.93%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to MTDR's edge.
- 2INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3MTDR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 11-point move would eliminate MTDR's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MTDR leads on balance| Metric | INTC | MTDR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 26% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | 11.9% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 102.7% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 36.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 12.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 0.56 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | INTC | MTDR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 11.4% | 3.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | 17.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.3% | 12.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 109.1% | 9.6% |
| Year to date | 171.9% | 45.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 309.8% | 28.3% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | MTDR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 61.3 | 64.1 |
| ADX (14) | 15.5 | 26 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.2% | 13.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 33.4% | 18.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 58.9% | 31% |
Risk
MTDR is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | MTDR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.89 | -0.5 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.12 | 0.75 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.98 | 1.04 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -29.5% |
| Current drawdown | -28.8% | -5.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.9% | 42% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -4.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or MTDR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, MTDR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 55 against INTC's 44. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or MTDR the better buy right now?
MTDR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor MTDR over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MTDR leads Value by 31 points; MTDR leads Risk Resilience by 24 points; INTC leads Quality by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or MTDR?
Analyst price targets imply -0.1% upside for INTC and +14.9% for MTDR, so the Street currently favors MTDR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or MTDR?
MTDR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. MTDR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 31 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or MTDR?
MTDR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or MTDR?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or MTDR?
MTDR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MTDR on Risk Resilience, by 24 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than MTDR?
MTDR leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.9% vs 102.7%; operating margin 0.1% vs 36.3%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 12.8%.
Is MTDR's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
MTDR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 11 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-01, when MTDR moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the INTC vs MTDR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to MTDR's edge; INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; MTDR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 11-point move would eliminate MTDR's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INTC and MTDR?
INTC: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. MTDR: 5 bullish / 0 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On MTDR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and MTDR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.