INTC vs REG Stock Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Regency Centers Corporation
REG leads
REG leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value, and the lead has widened from 7 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support REG, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Intel Corp.
Regency Centers Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors REG over INTC, 48 versus 33 as of Sep 5, 2026. REG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value. REG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor REG today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. REG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 15 points over 30 sessions. REG leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Intel Corp. and Regency Centers Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare INTC and REG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience15%30 vs 77REG +47
- Value30%30 vs 43REG +13
- Momentum25%33 vs 43REG +10
- Quality30%39 vs 43REG +4
5 of 6 evidence groups favor REG. REG’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
No new signals fired.
REG's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and REG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
REG (Regency Centers Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and value.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 45.1% against 12.2%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
REGREG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
REGREG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
REGREG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 13 points.
Momentum
REGREG on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
REGREG on Risk Resilience, by 47 points.
Analyst upside
REGREG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | REG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +7.6% | +13.8% | REG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +135.8% | +14% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor REG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | REG | 33 vs 48 |
| Fundamentals | REGon balance | EPS growth -195.9% vs -10.3%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 9.6%; gross margin 38.9% vs 35.1% — REG takes 2 of 3 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | REG | Value 30 vs 43 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -5.5% vs -4.5%; vs 200-day 24.1% vs 0% |
| Risk Resilience | REG | Risk Resilience 30 vs 77 |
| Analyst expectations | REG | Target upside 7.6% vs 13.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and REG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on REG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3REG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 15 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- REG +15
- 33 vs 48
- 7 sessions ago
- REG +13
- 34 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- REG +7
- 38 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- REG +8
- 45 vs 53
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on May 11 when REG moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (37.24%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.65%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.88%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (1.42%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.51%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.87%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 47 points behind, the largest single contributor to REG's edge.
- 2INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3REG's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
REG leads on balance| Metric | INTC | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 0.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | -10.3% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 35.1% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 40.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 9.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 0.8 |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | REG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 30.6 | 43 |
| ADX (14) | 15.1 | 25.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.5% | -4.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 24.1% | 0% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 45.1% | 12.2% |
Risk
REG is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.93 | 0.04 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.04 | 0.15 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.79 | 0.24 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -9.6% |
| Current drawdown | -35% | -8.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.1% | 15.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -1.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or REG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, REG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 48 against INTC's 33. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or REG the better buy right now?
REG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor REG over INTC?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. REG leads Risk Resilience by 47 points; REG leads Value by 13 points; REG leads Momentum by 10 points. REG leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by INTC simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or REG?
Analyst price targets imply +7.6% upside for INTC and +13.8% for REG, so the Street currently favors REG. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or REG?
REG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. REG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 13 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or REG?
REG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or REG?
REG on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or REG?
REG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. REG on Risk Resilience, by 47 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than REG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 38.9% vs 35.1%; operating margin 0.1% vs 40.3%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 9.6%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is REG's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
REG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 15 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-22 and 2026-09-03. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-05-11, when REG moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the INTC vs REG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 47 points behind, the largest single contributor to REG's edge; INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; REG's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about INTC and REG?
INTC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. REG: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On REG it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and REG with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.