IPGP vs KLIC Stock Comparison
IPG Photonics Corporation vs Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
KLIC leads
KLIC leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value. Wall Street currently favors IPGP on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support KLIC, and its current signal state is conflicted.
IPG Photonics Corporation
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors KLIC over IPGP, 51 versus 43 as of Sep 5, 2026. KLIC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while IPGP holds the stronger risk resilience profile. KLIC also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors IPGP. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KLIC today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. KLIC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare IPG Photonics Corporation and Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare IPGP and KLIC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%48 vs 65KLIC +17
- Value30%41 vs 57KLIC +16
- Risk Resilience15%60 vs 47IPGP +13
- Momentum25%31 vs 30Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor KLIC. KLIC’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; IPGP keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
KLIC's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — IPGP and KLIC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
KLIC (Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
IPGP (IPG Photonics Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
KLICKLIC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
IPGPIPGP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
KLICKLIC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
IPGPIPGP on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
IPGPIPGP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors KLIC, analyst targets favor IPGP. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | IPGP | KLIC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +62.8% | -14.2% | IPGP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +32.3% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KLIC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | KLIC | 43 vs 51 |
| Fundamentals | KLICon balance | revenue growth 4.9% vs 36.2%; EPS growth 200% vs 64.2%; TTM ROE 1.3% vs 13.6%; gross margin 38.4% vs 48.2% — KLIC takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | KLIC | Value 41 vs 57 |
| Technicals | KLIC | Price vs 50-day -14.6% vs -17.3%; vs 200-day -24.6% vs 0.1% |
| Risk Resilience | IPGP | Risk Resilience 60 vs 47 |
| Analyst expectations | IPGP | Target upside 62.8% vs -14.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of IPGP and KLIC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on KLIC.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4KLIC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- KLIC +8
- 43 vs 51
- 7 sessions ago
- KLIC +10
- 43 vs 53
- 30 sessions ago
- KLIC +10
- 44 vs 54
- 90 sessions ago
- KLIC +10
- 53 vs 63
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (10.96%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.85%)
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (25.23%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.31%)
KLIC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.01%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.55%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1IPGP closes the Quality gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to KLIC's edge.
- 2IPGP's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3KLIC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
KLIC leads on balance| Metric | IPGP | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.9% | 36.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 200% | 64.2% |
| Gross margin | 38.4% | 48.2% |
| Operating margin | 0.7% | 13.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 1.3% | 13.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.01 | 0.04 |
Performance
KLIC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | IPGP | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1% | -6.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -11.8% | -13.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -37.6% | -24.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -39.7% | 24.2% |
| Year to date | 6.8% | 73% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -4.6% | 115.8% |
Technicals
KLIC has the stronger structure| Metric | IPGP | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 34.2 | 25.7 |
| ADX (14) | 23.6 | 31.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -14.6% | -17.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -24.6% | 0.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 55% | 58.3% |
Risk
IPGP is the more resilient| Metric | IPGP | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.08 | 2.19 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.22 | 1.58 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.3 | 2.35 |
| Max drawdown | -54% | -41.7% |
| Current drawdown | -50.3% | -41.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 72% | 57% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.4% | -5.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, IPGP or KLIC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, KLIC is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 51 against IPGP's 43. The edge comes from quality and value. IPGP is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is IPGP or KLIC the better buy right now?
KLIC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor KLIC over IPGP?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. KLIC leads Quality by 17 points; KLIC leads Value by 16 points; IPGP leads Risk Resilience by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, IPGP or KLIC?
Analyst price targets imply +62.8% upside for IPGP and -14.2% for KLIC, so the Street currently favors IPGP. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors KLIC. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, IPGP or KLIC?
KLIC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. KLIC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, IPGP or KLIC?
IPGP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, IPGP or KLIC?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, IPGP or KLIC?
IPGP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. IPGP on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is IPGP more profitable than KLIC?
KLIC leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.4% vs 48.2%; operating margin 0.7% vs 13.4%; ttm roe 1.3% vs 13.6%.
Is KLIC's lead over IPGP getting stronger or weaker?
KLIC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-23 and 2026-09-04. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the IPGP vs KLIC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: IPGP closes the Quality gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to KLIC's edge; IPGP's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; KLIC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about IPGP and KLIC?
IPGP: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. KLIC: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on IPGP is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On KLIC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare IPGP and KLIC with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.