IPGP vs LSCC Stock Comparison
IPGP currently leads LSCC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 44 vs 37. The clearest difference is risk resilience, while LSCC has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between IPGP and LSCC?
IPGP leads the current stock comparison as IPG Photonics Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
IPG Photonics Corporation vs Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
IPGP leads
IPGP leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from LSCC.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support IPGP, and the lead recently changed hands.
IPG Photonics Corporation
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors IPGP over LSCC, 44 versus 37 as of Oct 21, 2026. IPGP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value, while LSCC holds the stronger quality profile. IPGP also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor IPGP today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. IPGP lead: Reversed — LSCC led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; IPGP now leads by 7.
Compare IPG Photonics Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare IPGP and LSCC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience66 vs 43IPGP +23
- Value41 vs 24IPGP +17
- Quality48 vs 64LSCC +16
- Momentum28 vs 18IPGP +10
4 of 6 evidence groups favor IPGP. IPGP’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value; LSCC keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
IPGP's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — IPGP and LSCC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
IPGP (IPG Photonics Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and value.
LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 51.2% against 38.8%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
IPGPIPGP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
IPGPIPGP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
IPGPIPGP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
IPGPIPGP on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
IPGPIPGP on Risk Resilience, by 23 points.
Analyst upside
IPGPIPGP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | IPGP | LSCC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +71.6% | +45% | IPGP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +32.3% | +28.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor IPGP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | IPGP | 44 vs 37 |
| Fundamentals | LSCCon balance | revenue growth 4.9% vs 17.7%; EPS growth 200% vs -12.5%; TTM ROE 1.3% vs 4.9%; gross margin 38.4% vs 67.7% — LSCC takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | IPGP | Value 41 vs 24 |
| Technicals | LSCC | Price vs 50-day -5% vs -9.7%; vs 200-day -28.5% vs -6.7% |
| Risk Resilience | IPGP | Risk Resilience 66 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | IPGP | Target upside 71.6% vs 45% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of IPGP and LSCC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on IPGP.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20IPGP lead: Reversed — LSCC led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; IPGP now leads by 7.
- Today
- IPGP +7
- 44 vs 37
- 7 sessions ago
- IPGP +7
- 44 vs 37
- 30 sessions ago
- LSCC +6
- 47 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- LSCC +2
- 47 vs 49
The lead changed hands 9 times in this window, most recently on Oct 13 when IPGP moved ahead of LSCC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral
Only IPGP
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (30.10%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.8%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only LSCC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.74%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
LSCC is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.12%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.35%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1LSCC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to IPGP's edge.
- 2LSCC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3IPGP starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
LSCC leads on balance| Metric | IPGP | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.9% | 17.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 200% | -12.5% |
| Gross margin | 38.4% | 67.7% |
| Operating margin | 0.7% | 7.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 1.3% | 4.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.01 | 0.05 |
Performance
LSCC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | IPGP | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.4% | -11.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.3% | -12.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -25.9% | -21.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -41.5% | -8.2% |
| Year to date | 1.2% | 46% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -16% | 53% |
Technicals
LSCC has the stronger structure| Metric | IPGP | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.7 | 32 |
| ADX (14) | 16.4 | 20.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5% | -9.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -28.5% | -6.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 38.8% | 51.2% |
Risk
IPGP is the more resilient| Metric | IPGP | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.03 | 3 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.08 | 0.94 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.11 | 1.47 |
| Max drawdown | -54% | -33.3% |
| Current drawdown | -52.9% | -30.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 72% | 61.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.3% | -6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, IPGP or LSCC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, IPGP is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 44 against LSCC's 37. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. LSCC is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is IPGP or LSCC the better buy right now?
IPGP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor IPGP over LSCC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. IPGP leads Risk Resilience by 23 points; IPGP leads Value by 17 points; LSCC leads Quality by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, IPGP or LSCC?
Analyst price targets imply +71.6% upside for IPGP and +45% for LSCC, so the Street currently favors IPGP. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, IPGP or LSCC?
IPGP is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. IPGP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, IPGP or LSCC?
IPGP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, IPGP or LSCC?
IPGP on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, IPGP or LSCC?
IPGP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. IPGP on Risk Resilience, by 23 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is IPGP more profitable than LSCC?
LSCC leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.4% vs 67.7%; operating margin 0.7% vs 7.6%; ttm roe 1.3% vs 4.9%.
Is IPGP's lead over LSCC getting stronger or weaker?
IPGP lead: Reversed — LSCC led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; IPGP now leads by 7. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 9 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-13, when IPGP moved ahead of LSCC.
What would change the IPGP vs LSCC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: LSCC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to IPGP's edge; LSCC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; IPGP starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about IPGP and LSCC?
IPGP: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral. LSCC: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on IPGP is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On LSCC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare IPGP and LSCC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.