IRM vs REXR Stock Comparison
Compare IRM and REXR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between IRM and REXR?
REXR leads the current stock comparison as Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Iron Mountain Incorporated vs Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
REXR leads
REXR leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors IRM on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support REXR.
Iron Mountain Incorporated
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors REXR over IRM, 50 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. REXR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while IRM holds the stronger value profile. REXR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors IRM. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor REXR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. REXR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Iron Mountain Incorporated and Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare IRM and REXR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum30 vs 61REXR +31
- Risk Resilience38 vs 56REXR +18
- Value48 vs 38IRM +10
- Quality54 vs 51Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor REXR. REXR’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; IRM keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
New signals
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No new signals fired.
REXR's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — IRM and REXR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
REXR (Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
IRM (Iron Mountain Incorporated): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 30.2% against 18.3%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
REXRREXR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
REXRREXR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
IRMIRM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
REXRREXR on the Momentum factor, by 31 points.
Lower downside
REXRREXR on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
IRMIRM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors REXR, analyst targets favor IRM. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | IRM | REXR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +25.5% | +0.5% | IRM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +10.4% | +20.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor REXR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | REXR | 44 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | REXR | EPS growth -29.2% vs -6.9%; TTM ROE -38.4% vs -4.8%; gross margin 54.2% vs 61%; operating margin 18.8% vs 39.6% |
| Valuation | IRM | Value 48 vs 38 |
| Technicals | REXR | Price vs 50-day -5.2% vs 3.9%; vs 200-day 2.8% vs 0.2% |
| Risk Resilience | REXR | Risk Resilience 38 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | IRM | Target upside 25.5% vs 0.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of IRM and REXR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on REXR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10REXR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- REXR +6
- 44 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- REXR +8
- 43 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- REXR +6
- 44 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- REXR +5
- 41 vs 46
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Aug 19 when REXR moved ahead of IRM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (10.53%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.84%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
IRM is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.02%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.81%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1IRM closes the Momentum gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to REXR's edge.
- 2IRM's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3REXR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
REXR leads on balance| Metric | IRM | REXR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.8% | 0.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -29.2% | -6.9% |
| Gross margin | 54.2% | 61% |
| Operating margin | 18.8% | 39.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -38.4% | -4.8% |
| Debt to equity | -15.31 | 0.45 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | IRM | REXR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.9% | 1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -9.2% | 1.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.5% | 7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 4.9% | 4.9% |
| Year to date | 36.1% | -4.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 22.1% | -13.7% |
Technicals
REXR has the stronger structure| Metric | IRM | REXR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 28.8 | 49.3 |
| ADX (14) | 15.7 | 16.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.2% | 3.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 2.8% | 0.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 30.2% | 18.3% |
Risk
REXR is the more resilient| Metric | IRM | REXR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.08 | 0.56 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.52 | -0.6 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.79 | -1.02 |
| Max drawdown | -25.9% | -26.6% |
| Current drawdown | -15.2% | -16.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 32.8% | 25.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | -2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, IRM or REXR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, REXR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 50 against IRM's 44. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. IRM is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is IRM or REXR the better buy right now?
REXR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor REXR over IRM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. REXR leads Momentum by 31 points; REXR leads Risk Resilience by 18 points; IRM leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, IRM or REXR?
Analyst price targets imply +25.5% upside for IRM and +0.5% for REXR, so the Street currently favors IRM. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors REXR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, IRM or REXR?
IRM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. IRM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, IRM or REXR?
REXR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, IRM or REXR?
REXR on the Momentum factor, by 31 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, IRM or REXR?
REXR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. REXR on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is IRM more profitable than REXR?
REXR leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 54.2% vs 61%; operating margin 18.8% vs 39.6%; ttm roe -38.4% vs -4.8%.
Is REXR's lead over IRM getting stronger or weaker?
REXR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-19, when REXR moved ahead of IRM.
What would change the IRM vs REXR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: IRM closes the Momentum gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to REXR's edge; IRM's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; REXR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about IRM and REXR?
IRM: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. REXR: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on IRM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On REXR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare IRM and REXR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.