JBL vs KEYS Stock Comparison
KEYS currently leads JBL in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 48 vs 46. The clearest difference is quality, while JBL has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between JBL and KEYS?
KEYS leads the current stock comparison as Keysight Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Jabil Inc. vs Keysight Technologies, Inc.
KEYS leads
KEYS leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 6 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors JBL on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support KEYS, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Jabil Inc.
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors KEYS over JBL, 48 versus 46 as of Oct 21, 2026. KEYS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while JBL holds the stronger value profile. KEYS also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors JBL. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KEYS today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. KEYS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Jabil Inc. and Keysight Technologies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare JBL and KEYS against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality44 vs 73KEYS +29
- Value65 vs 41JBL +24
- Risk Resilience39 vs 59KEYS +20
- Momentum29 vs 20JBL +9
3 of 6 evidence groups favor KEYS. KEYS’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; JBL keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +6
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
KEYS's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — JBL and KEYS both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
KEYS (Keysight Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
JBL (Jabil Inc.): the counter-case, on value, momentum, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 55.4% against 33.1%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
KEYSKEYS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
JBLJBL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JBLJBL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points.
Momentum
JBLJBL on the Momentum factor, by 9 points.
Lower downside
KEYSKEYS on Risk Resilience, by 20 points.
Analyst upside
JBLJBL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors KEYS, analyst targets favor JBL. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | JBL | KEYS | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +52.6% | +17.2% | JBL has more room |
| Target dispersion | +24.9% | +33.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KEYS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 46 vs 48 |
| Fundamentals | KEYSon balance | revenue growth 5.7% vs 7.5%; EPS growth 24.9% vs 13.4%; TTM ROE 62.4% vs 20.1%; gross margin 9.2% vs 64.7%; operating margin 4.3% vs 20.3% — KEYS takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | JBL | Value 65 vs 41 |
| Technicals | KEYS | Price vs 50-day -9.6% vs -0.7%; vs 200-day -8.7% vs 7.1% |
| Risk Resilience | KEYS | Risk Resilience 39 vs 59 |
| Analyst expectations | JBL | Target upside 52.6% vs 17.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JBL and KEYS and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on KEYS.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20KEYS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- KEYS +2
- 46 vs 48
- 7 sessions ago
- KEYS +4
- 46 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- KEYS +6
- 59 vs 65
- 90 sessions ago
- KEYS +2
- 62 vs 64
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Jul 2 when KEYS moved ahead of JBL.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only KEYS
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
KEYS leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.37%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.15%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1JBL closes the Quality gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to KEYS's edge.
- 2JBL's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3KEYS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate KEYS's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
KEYS leads on balance| Metric | JBL | KEYS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 5.7% | 7.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 24.9% | 13.4% |
| Gross margin | 9.2% | 64.7% |
| Operating margin | 4.3% | 20.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 62.4% | 20.1% |
| Debt to equity | 2.94 | 0.42 |
Performance
KEYS leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | JBL | KEYS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -12.8% | -9.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -10.3% | -3.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -12.9% | 2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -13.7% | 0% |
| Year to date | 21.6% | 64.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 32.6% | 105.8% |
Technicals
KEYS has the stronger structure| Metric | JBL | KEYS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.4 | 35.7 |
| ADX (14) | 15.7 | 27.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -9.6% | -0.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -8.7% | 7.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 55.4% | 33.1% |
Risk
KEYS is the more resilient| Metric | JBL | KEYS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.14 | 1.85 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.75 | 1.75 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.06 | 2.86 |
| Max drawdown | -28.1% | -20.5% |
| Current drawdown | -28.1% | -13.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 47.2% | 44.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.1% | -3.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, JBL or KEYS?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, KEYS is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 48 against JBL's 46. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. JBL is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is JBL or KEYS the better buy right now?
KEYS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor KEYS over JBL?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. KEYS leads Quality by 29 points; JBL leads Value by 24 points; KEYS leads Risk Resilience by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, JBL or KEYS?
Analyst price targets imply +52.6% upside for JBL and +17.2% for KEYS, so the Street currently favors JBL. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors KEYS. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, JBL or KEYS?
JBL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JBL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, JBL or KEYS?
JBL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, JBL or KEYS?
JBL on the Momentum factor, by 9 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, JBL or KEYS?
KEYS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. KEYS on Risk Resilience, by 20 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is JBL more profitable than KEYS?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 9.2% vs 64.7%; operating margin 4.3% vs 20.3%; ttm roe 62.4% vs 20.1%. JBL leads on one measure and KEYS on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is KEYS's lead over JBL getting stronger or weaker?
KEYS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-02, when KEYS moved ahead of JBL.
What would change the JBL vs KEYS verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: JBL closes the Quality gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to KEYS's edge; JBL's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; KEYS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate KEYS's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about JBL and KEYS?
JBL: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. KEYS: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on JBL is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On KEYS it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare JBL and KEYS with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.