JKHY vs MSCI Stock Comparison
JKHY currently leads MSCI in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 65 vs 56. The clearest difference is value, while MSCI has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between JKHY and MSCI?
JKHY leads the current stock comparison as Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. vs MSCI Inc.
JKHY leads
JKHY leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 12 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support JKHY, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
MSCI Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JKHY over MSCI, 65 versus 56 as of Oct 21, 2026. JKHY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while MSCI holds the stronger momentum profile. JKHY also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JKHY today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. JKHY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. and MSCI Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare JKHY and MSCI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value61 vs 24JKHY +37
- Momentum63 vs 90MSCI +27
- Quality73 vs 60JKHY +13
- Risk Resilience61 vs 54JKHY +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor JKHY. JKHY’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; MSCI keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
New signals
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +15
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
JKHY's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — JKHY and MSCI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
JKHY (Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
MSCI (MSCI Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 26.7% against 19.8%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JKHYJKHY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
JKHYJKHY on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JKHYJKHY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 37 points.
Momentum
MSCIMSCI on the Momentum factor, by 27 points.
Lower downside
JKHYJKHY on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
JKHYJKHY on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | JKHY | MSCI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +18.1% | +16.1% | JKHY has more room |
| Target dispersion | +31.5% | +20.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | JKHY | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 6.17% | 19.78% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.720 | $2.920 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.320 | $7.200 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #207 | #17 |
MSCI grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 19.78% a year against JKHY's 6.17%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JKHY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JKHY | 65 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | MSCIon balance | revenue growth -0.5% vs 1.9%; EPS growth -8.2% vs -15.2%; TTM ROE 23.5% vs -54.1%; gross margin 43.6% vs 83%; operating margin 24.9% vs 55.7% — MSCI takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | JKHY | Value 61 vs 24 |
| Technicals | MSCI | Price vs 50-day -1.8% vs 8.1%; vs 200-day -0.6% vs 3.4% |
| Risk Resilience | JKHY | Risk Resilience 61 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | JKHY | Target upside 18.1% vs 16.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JKHY and MSCI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JKHY.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20JKHY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- JKHY +9
- 65 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- JKHY +15
- 70 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- JKHY +12
- 54 vs 42
- 90 sessions ago
- JKHY +24
- 61 vs 37
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only JKHY
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.40%)
2 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
Only MSCI
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.33%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: RSI Overbought, MACD Bullish Crossover.
JKHY leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.84%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.16%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MSCI closes the Value gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to JKHY's edge.
- 2MSCI's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3JKHY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 9-point move would eliminate JKHY's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MSCI leads on balance| Metric | JKHY | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.5% | 1.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -8.2% | -15.2% |
| Gross margin | 43.6% | 83% |
| Operating margin | 24.9% | 55.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 23.5% | -54.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.02 | -2.43 |
Performance
MSCI leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | JKHY | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.1% | 5.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.8% | 7.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 5.9% | 3.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -0.5% | -1% |
| Year to date | -15.2% | 3.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 1.2% | 7.5% |
Technicals
MSCI has the stronger structure| Metric | JKHY | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 75.1 | 74.1 |
| ADX (14) | 18.9 | 15.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.8% | 8.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.6% | 3.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 19.8% | 26.7% |
Risk
JKHY is the more resilient| Metric | JKHY | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.05 | 0.41 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.05 | 0.36 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.07 | 0.47 |
| Max drawdown | -35.9% | -18.1% |
| Current drawdown | -19.7% | -8.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 29.3% | 30.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, JKHY or MSCI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JKHY is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 65 against MSCI's 56. The edge comes from value and quality. MSCI is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is JKHY or MSCI the better buy right now?
JKHY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JKHY over MSCI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JKHY leads Value by 37 points; MSCI leads Momentum by 27 points; JKHY leads Quality by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, JKHY or MSCI?
Analyst price targets imply +18.1% upside for JKHY and +16.1% for MSCI, so the Street currently favors JKHY. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, JKHY or MSCI?
JKHY is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JKHY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 37 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, JKHY or MSCI?
JKHY on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, JKHY or MSCI?
MSCI on the Momentum factor, by 27 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, JKHY or MSCI?
JKHY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. JKHY on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is JKHY more profitable than MSCI?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 43.6% vs 83%; operating margin 24.9% vs 55.7%; ttm roe 23.5% vs -54.1%. JKHY leads on one measure and MSCI on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is JKHY's lead over MSCI getting stronger or weaker?
JKHY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the JKHY vs MSCI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MSCI closes the Value gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to JKHY's edge; MSCI's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; JKHY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 9-point move would eliminate JKHY's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about JKHY and MSCI?
JKHY: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. MSCI: 2 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on JKHY is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On MSCI it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare JKHY and MSCI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.