JKS vs MAXN Stock Comparison
MAXN currently leads JKS in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 61 vs 34. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between JKS and MAXN?
MAXN leads the current stock comparison as Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. vs Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.
MAXN leads
MAXN leads by 27 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 30 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support MAXN, and its lead is narrowing.
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors MAXN over JKS, 61 versus 34 as of Oct 31, 2026. MAXN's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. MAXN also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MAXN today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. MAXN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 30 to 27 points over 30 sessions.
Compare JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. and Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare JKS and MAXN against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality2 vs 50MAXN +48
- Risk Resilience36 vs 54MAXN +18
- Value65 vs 75MAXN +10
4 of 6 evidence groups favor MAXN. MAXN’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.4%)
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
MAXN's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — JKS and MAXN both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
MAXN (Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
JKS (JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.): the counter-case, on fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
MAXNMAXN on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MAXNMAXN on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
MAXNMAXN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
MAXNMAXN on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
MAXNMAXN on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | JKS | MAXN | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +142.2% | +376.2% | MAXN has more room |
| Target dispersion | +103.4% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MAXN. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | MAXN | 34 vs 61 |
| Fundamentals | JKSon balance | revenue growth 0.6% vs 0%; TTM ROE -21.5% vs 20%; gross margin 4.8% vs -39.2%; operating margin -7% vs -176.3% — JKS takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | MAXN | Value 65 vs 75 |
| Technicals | JKS | Price vs 50-day -19.1% vs -88.6%; vs 200-day -57.1% vs -37.9% |
| Risk Resilience | MAXN | Risk Resilience 36 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | MAXN | Target upside 142.2% vs 376.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JKS and MAXN and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 27 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on MAXN.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28MAXN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 30 to 27 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- MAXN +27
- 34 vs 61
- 7 sessions ago
- MAXN +29
- 32 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- MAXN +30
- 31 vs 61
- 90 sessions ago
- MAXN +17
- 31 vs 48
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only JKS
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (80.32%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.56%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.4%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
JKS is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.86%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1JKS closes the Quality gap — currently 48 points behind, the largest single contributor to MAXN's edge.
- 2JKS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3MAXN starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 27-point move would eliminate MAXN's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JKS leads on balance| Metric | JKS | MAXN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.6% | 0% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -48.8% | 0% |
| Gross margin | 4.8% | -39.2% |
| Operating margin | -7% | -176.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -21.5% | 20% |
| Debt to equity | 3.4 | -0.98 |
Performance
JKS leads 2 of 3 windows| Metric | JKS | MAXN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.5% | -17.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.2% | -30.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -44.4% | — |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -61.7% | — |
| Year to date | -68% | -52.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -61.7% | — |
Technicals
JKS has the stronger structure| Metric | JKS | MAXN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41 | 15.3 |
| ADX (14) | 49.4 | 22.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -19.1% | -88.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -57.1% | -37.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 36.7% | 143.7% |
Risk
MAXN is the more resilient| Metric | JKS | MAXN |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.76 | 1.55 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.42 | -1.17 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.3 | -1.68 |
| Max drawdown | -73.7% | -82.4% |
| Current drawdown | -73% | -80.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 60.9% | 144.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -12.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, JKS or MAXN?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, MAXN is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 61 against JKS's 34. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is JKS or MAXN the better buy right now?
MAXN carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor MAXN over JKS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MAXN leads Quality by 48 points; MAXN leads Risk Resilience by 18 points; MAXN leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, JKS or MAXN?
Analyst price targets imply +142.2% upside for JKS and +376.2% for MAXN, so the Street currently favors MAXN. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, JKS or MAXN?
MAXN is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. MAXN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, JKS or MAXN?
MAXN on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, JKS or MAXN?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, JKS or MAXN?
MAXN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MAXN on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is JKS more profitable than MAXN?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 4.8% vs -39.2%; operating margin -7% vs -176.3%; ttm roe -21.5% vs 20%. JKS leads on two measures and MAXN on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is MAXN's lead over JKS getting stronger or weaker?
MAXN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 30 to 27 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the JKS vs MAXN verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: JKS closes the Quality gap — currently 48 points behind, the largest single contributor to MAXN's edge; JKS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; MAXN starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 27-point move would eliminate MAXN's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about JKS and MAXN?
JKS: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. MAXN: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on JKS is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare JKS and MAXN with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.