JKS vs PLUG Stock Comparison
JKS currently leads PLUG in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 34 vs 28. The clearest difference is value, while PLUG has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between JKS and PLUG?
JKS leads the current stock comparison as JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. vs Plug Power Inc.
JKS leads
JKS leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support JKS, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
Plug Power Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JKS over PLUG, 34 versus 28 as of Oct 31, 2026. JKS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while PLUG holds the stronger quality profile. JKS also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JKS today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. JKS lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. and Plug Power Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare JKS and PLUG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value65 vs 46JKS +19
- Momentum35 vs 25JKS +10
- Quality2 vs 9PLUG +7
- Risk Resilience36 vs 33Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor JKS. JKS’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; PLUG keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.4%)
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
JKS's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — JKS and PLUG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
JKS (JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
PLUG (Plug Power Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 44.4% against 36.7%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JKSJKS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PLUGPLUG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JKSJKS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points.
Momentum
JKSJKS on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
JKSJKS carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
JKSJKS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | JKS | PLUG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +142.2% | +75.8% | JKS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +103.4% | +158.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JKS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JKS | 34 vs 28 |
| Fundamentals | JKSon balance | EPS growth -48.8% vs 22.2%; TTM ROE -21.5% vs -176.2%; gross margin 4.8% vs -18.5%; operating margin -7% vs -70.2% — JKS takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | JKS | Value 65 vs 46 |
| Technicals | PLUG | Price vs 50-day -19.1% vs -27.9%; vs 200-day -57.1% vs -41% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 36 vs 33 |
| Analyst expectations | JKS | Target upside 142.2% vs 75.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JKS and PLUG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JKS.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28JKS lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- JKS +6
- 34 vs 28
- 7 sessions ago
- JKS +4
- 32 vs 28
- 30 sessions ago
- JKS +3
- 31 vs 28
- 90 sessions ago
- PLUG +1
- 31 vs 32
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Sep 22 when PLUG moved ahead of JKS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only JKS
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.4%)
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only PLUG
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
JKS leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.86%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.87%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PLUG closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to JKS's edge.
- 2PLUG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3JKS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JKS leads on balance| Metric | JKS | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.6% | 9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -48.8% | 22.2% |
| Gross margin | 4.8% | -18.5% |
| Operating margin | -7% | -70.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -21.5% | -176.2% |
| Debt to equity | 3.4 | 1.41 |
Performance
PLUG leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | JKS | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.5% | 0.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.2% | -26.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -44.4% | -32.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -61.7% | -56.7% |
| Year to date | -68% | -27.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -61.7% | -51.9% |
Technicals
PLUG has the stronger structure| Metric | JKS | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41 | 22.3 |
| ADX (14) | 49.4 | 42.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -19.1% | -27.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -57.1% | -41% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 36.7% | 44.4% |
Risk
Split| Metric | JKS | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.76 | 2.26 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.42 | -0.52 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.3 | -1 |
| Max drawdown | -73.7% | -66.9% |
| Current drawdown | -73% | -65.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 60.9% | 79.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -7.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, JKS or PLUG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JKS is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 34 against PLUG's 28. The edge comes from value and momentum. PLUG is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is JKS or PLUG the better buy right now?
JKS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JKS over PLUG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JKS leads Value by 19 points; JKS leads Momentum by 10 points; PLUG leads Quality by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, JKS or PLUG?
Analyst price targets imply +142.2% upside for JKS and +75.8% for PLUG, so the Street currently favors JKS. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, JKS or PLUG?
JKS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JKS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, JKS or PLUG?
PLUG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, JKS or PLUG?
JKS on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, JKS or PLUG?
JKS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. JKS carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is JKS more profitable than PLUG?
JKS leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 4.8% vs -18.5%; operating margin -7% vs -70.2%; ttm roe -21.5% vs -176.2%.
Is JKS's lead over PLUG getting stronger or weaker?
JKS lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-22, when PLUG moved ahead of JKS.
What would change the JKS vs PLUG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PLUG closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to JKS's edge; PLUG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; JKS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about JKS and PLUG?
JKS: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. PLUG: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on JKS is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PLUG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare JKS and PLUG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.