JKS vs PLUG Stock Comparison
Compare JKS and PLUG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between JKS and PLUG?
JKS leads the current stock comparison as JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. vs Plug Power Inc.
JKS leads
JKS leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Value, but the lead has narrowed from 5 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support JKS, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
Plug Power Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JKS over PLUG, 31 versus 30 as of Sep 6, 2026. JKS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while PLUG holds the stronger momentum profile. JKS also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JKS today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. JKS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. and Plug Power Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare JKS and PLUG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%65 vs 46JKS +19
- Momentum25%24 vs 37PLUG +13
- Quality30%2 vs 9PLUG +7
- Risk Resilience15%31 vs 31Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor JKS. JKS’s edge is concentrated in value; PLUG keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
JKS's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — JKS and PLUG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
JKS (JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
PLUG (Plug Power Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, quality, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JKSJKS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
PLUGPLUG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JKSJKS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points.
Momentum
PLUGPLUG on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
PLUGPLUG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
JKSJKS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | JKS | PLUG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +54.4% | +44.2% | JKS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +70.3% | +107% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JKS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 31 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | JKSon balance | EPS growth -48.8% vs 22.2%; TTM ROE -21.5% vs -176.2%; gross margin 4.8% vs -18.5%; operating margin -7% vs -70.2% — JKS takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | JKS | Value 65 vs 46 |
| Technicals | PLUG | Price vs 50-day -22.5% vs -3.1%; vs 200-day -45.7% vs -12.2% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 31 vs 31 |
| Analyst expectations | JKS | Target upside 54.4% vs 44.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JKS and PLUG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JKS.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5JKS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- JKS +1
- 31 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 31 vs 31
- 30 sessions ago
- JKS +5
- 39 vs 34
- 90 sessions ago
- JKS +1
- 32 vs 31
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Aug 26 when PLUG moved ahead of JKS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 5 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (44.88%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (10.42%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.90%)
JKS leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.72%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.84%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PLUG closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to JKS's edge.
- 2PLUG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3JKS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate JKS's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JKS leads on balance| Metric | JKS | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.6% | 9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -48.8% | 22.2% |
| Gross margin | 4.8% | -18.5% |
| Operating margin | -7% | -70.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -21.5% | -176.2% |
| Debt to equity | 3.4 | 1.41 |
Performance
PLUG leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | JKS | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -11.5% | -0.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -29.3% | -0.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -40.3% | -32.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -48.7% | 1.9% |
| Year to date | -51.7% | 10.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -49.3% | 45.6% |
Technicals
PLUG has the stronger structure| Metric | JKS | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 18.4 | 44.4 |
| ADX (14) | 33 | 13.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -22.5% | -3.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -45.7% | -12.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 55.5% | 54.8% |
Risk
Split| Metric | JKS | PLUG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.81 | 2.42 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.88 | 0.84 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.41 | 1.89 |
| Max drawdown | -60.8% | -56.7% |
| Current drawdown | -60.8% | -47.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 62.6% | 97.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.3% | -8.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, JKS or PLUG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JKS is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 31 against PLUG's 30. The edge comes from value. PLUG is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is JKS or PLUG the better buy right now?
JKS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JKS over PLUG?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. JKS leads Value by 19 points; PLUG leads Momentum by 13 points; PLUG leads Quality by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, JKS or PLUG?
Analyst price targets imply +54.4% upside for JKS and +44.2% for PLUG, so the Street currently favors JKS. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, JKS or PLUG?
JKS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JKS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, JKS or PLUG?
PLUG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, JKS or PLUG?
PLUG on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, JKS or PLUG?
PLUG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PLUG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is JKS more profitable than PLUG?
JKS leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 4.8% vs -18.5%; operating margin -7% vs -70.2%; ttm roe -21.5% vs -176.2%.
Is JKS's lead over PLUG getting stronger or weaker?
JKS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-26, when PLUG moved ahead of JKS.
What would change the JKS vs PLUG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PLUG closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to JKS's edge; PLUG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; JKS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate JKS's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about JKS and PLUG?
JKS: 1 bullish / 5 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. PLUG: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on JKS is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PLUG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare JKS and PLUG with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.