JLL vs MCO Stock Comparison
JLL currently leads MCO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 62 vs 54. The clearest difference is value, while MCO has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between JLL and MCO?
JLL leads the current stock comparison as Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated vs Moody's Corporation
JLL leads
JLL leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Value.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support JLL, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
Moody's Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JLL over MCO, 62 versus 54 as of Oct 22, 2026. JLL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while MCO holds the stronger momentum profile. JLL also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JLL today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability. JLL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Moody's Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare JLL and MCO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value68 vs 24JLL +44
- Momentum51 vs 71MCO +20
- Risk Resilience56 vs 53Even
- Quality69 vs 70Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor JLL. JLL’s edge is concentrated in value; MCO keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +10
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -19
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
JLL's lead widened by 7 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — JLL and MCO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
JLL (Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
MCO (Moody's Corporation): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JLLJLL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
JLLJLL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JLLJLL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 44 points.
Momentum
MCOMCO on the Momentum factor, by 20 points.
Lower downside
MCOMCO carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
JLLJLL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | JLL | MCO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +33.6% | +10.1% | JLL has more room |
| Target dispersion | +32.8% | +24% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JLL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JLL | 62 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | JLLon balance | revenue growth 8.5% vs 5.1%; EPS growth 37.5% vs 34.5%; TTM ROE 13.6% vs 79.7%; gross margin 89.6% vs 71.9%; operating margin 4.8% vs 45.1% — JLL takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | JLL | Value 68 vs 24 |
| Technicals | MCO | Price vs 50-day -10% vs 0.7%; vs 200-day -5% vs 1.4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 56 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | JLL | Target upside 33.6% vs 10.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JLL and MCO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JLL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20JLL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- JLL +8
- 62 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- JLL +3
- 59 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- JLL +10
- 53 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- JLL +17
- 66 vs 49
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
JLL and MCO carry the same 2 signals, so the signals do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.95%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 5 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.2%, AIQ -5 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MCO closes the Value gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to JLL's edge.
- 2MCO generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3JLL's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JLL leads on balance| Metric | JLL | MCO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.5% | 5.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 37.5% | 34.5% |
| Gross margin | 89.6% | 71.9% |
| Operating margin | 4.8% | 45.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 13.6% | 79.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.34 | 2.49 |
Performance
MCO leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | JLL | MCO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.6% | 2.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.9% | 1.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.6% | -2.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -10.6% | 3.4% |
| Year to date | -8.2% | -6.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 3.6% | 1.4% |
Technicals
MCO has the stronger structure| Metric | JLL | MCO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 52.8 | 62.2 |
| ADX (14) | 34.8 | 22.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -10% | 0.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -5% | 1.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 30.6% | 25% |
Risk
Split| Metric | JLL | MCO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.95 | 0.53 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.15 | 0.03 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.19 | 0.05 |
| Max drawdown | -24.8% | -23.6% |
| Current drawdown | -21.3% | -11.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 35.4% | 28.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.1% | -2.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, JLL or MCO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JLL is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 62 against MCO's 54. The edge comes from value. MCO is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is JLL or MCO the better buy right now?
JLL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JLL over MCO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JLL leads Value by 44 points; MCO leads Momentum by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, JLL or MCO?
Analyst price targets imply +33.6% upside for JLL and +10.1% for MCO, so the Street currently favors JLL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, JLL or MCO?
JLL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JLL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 44 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, JLL or MCO?
JLL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, JLL or MCO?
MCO on the Momentum factor, by 20 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, JLL or MCO?
MCO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MCO carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is JLL more profitable than MCO?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 89.6% vs 71.9%; operating margin 4.8% vs 45.1%; ttm roe 13.6% vs 79.7%. JLL leads on one measure and MCO on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is JLL's lead over MCO getting stronger or weaker?
JLL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the JLL vs MCO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MCO closes the Value gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to JLL's edge; MCO generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; JLL's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about JLL and MCO?
JLL: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. MCO: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on JLL is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On MCO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare JLL and MCO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.