JLL vs SPG Stock Comparison
JLL currently leads SPG in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 70 vs 65. The clearest difference is value, while SPG has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between JLL and SPG?
JLL leads the current stock comparison as Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated vs Simon Property Group, Inc.
JLL leads
JLL leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support JLL, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
Simon Property Group, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JLL over SPG, 70 versus 65 as of Oct 31, 2026. JLL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while SPG holds the stronger risk resilience profile. JLL also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JLL today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. JLL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Simon Property Group, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare JLL and SPG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value68 vs 52JLL +16
- Risk Resilience47 vs 53SPG +6
- Momentum87 vs 83JLL +4
- Quality69 vs 70Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor JLL. JLL’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; SPG keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +38
New signals
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.57%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
The lead changed hands: JLL moved ahead of SPG in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — JLL and SPG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
JLL (Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
SPG (Simon Property Group, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JLLJLL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
JLLJLL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JLLJLL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
JLLJLL on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
SPGSPG on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
JLLJLL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | JLL | SPG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +13.6% | -0.1% | JLL has more room |
| Target dispersion | +32.8% | +41.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JLL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JLL | 70 vs 65 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 8.5% vs 1.9%; TTM ROE 13.6% vs 112.7%; gross margin 89.6% vs 84.1%; operating margin 4.8% vs 48.1% |
| Valuation | JLL | Value 68 vs 52 |
| Technicals | JLL | Price vs 50-day 8.1% vs 5%; vs 200-day 2.8% vs 2.8% |
| Risk Resilience | SPG | Risk Resilience 47 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | JLL | Target upside 13.6% vs -0.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JLL and SPG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JLL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28JLL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- JLL +5
- 70 vs 65
- 7 sessions ago
- SPG +3
- 61 vs 64
- 30 sessions ago
- JLL +3
- 54 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- JLL +13
- 67 vs 54
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 28 when JLL moved ahead of SPG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only JLL
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.57%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
5 bullish / 0 bearish
Only SPG
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, Keltner Channel Breakout, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
JLL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.79%, AIQ +8 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.94%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SPG closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to JLL's edge.
- 2SPG's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3JLL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | JLL | SPG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.5% | 1.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 37.5% | 0.7% |
| Gross margin | 89.6% | 84.1% |
| Operating margin | 4.8% | 48.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 13.6% | 112.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.34 | 6.64 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | JLL | SPG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 8.9% | 2.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 9.1% | 5.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.8% | -8.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -1.6% | 5.6% |
| Year to date | -0.9% | 14.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 5.2% | 18.6% |
Technicals
JLL has the stronger structure| Metric | JLL | SPG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 66 | 69.4 |
| ADX (14) | 28.4 | 32.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | 8.1% | 5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 50.4% | 20.2% |
Risk
SPG is the more resilient| Metric | JLL | SPG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.97 | 0.21 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.26 | 0.83 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.36 | 1.34 |
| Max drawdown | -24.8% | -16.5% |
| Current drawdown | -15.1% | -10.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.2% | 19.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.1% | -1.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, JLL or SPG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JLL is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 70 against SPG's 65. The edge comes from value and momentum. SPG is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is JLL or SPG the better buy right now?
JLL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JLL over SPG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JLL leads Value by 16 points; SPG leads Risk Resilience by 6 points; JLL leads Momentum by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, JLL or SPG?
Analyst price targets imply +13.6% upside for JLL and -0.1% for SPG, so the Street currently favors JLL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, JLL or SPG?
JLL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JLL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, JLL or SPG?
JLL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, JLL or SPG?
JLL on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, JLL or SPG?
SPG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SPG on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is JLL more profitable than SPG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 89.6% vs 84.1%; operating margin 4.8% vs 48.1%; ttm roe 13.6% vs 112.7%. JLL leads on one measure and SPG on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is JLL's lead over SPG getting stronger or weaker?
JLL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-28, when JLL moved ahead of SPG.
What would change the JLL vs SPG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SPG closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to JLL's edge; SPG's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; JLL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about JLL and SPG?
JLL: 4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SPG: 5 bullish / 0 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on JLL is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SPG it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare JLL and SPG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.