KDP vs KVUE Stock Comparison
KVUE currently leads KDP in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 59 vs 51. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between KDP and KVUE?
KVUE leads the current stock comparison as Kenvue Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. vs Kenvue Inc.
KVUE leads
KVUE leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors KDP on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support KVUE, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
Kenvue Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors KVUE over KDP, 59 versus 51 as of Oct 31, 2026. KVUE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. KVUE also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors KDP. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KVUE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. KVUE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Kenvue Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare KDP and KVUE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality37 vs 60KVUE +23
- Risk Resilience46 vs 52KVUE +6
- Value45 vs 44Even
- Momentum79 vs 79Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor KVUE. KVUE’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 8 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
KVUE's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — KDP and KVUE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
KVUE (Kenvue Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
KDP (Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.): the counter-case, on technicals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
KVUEKVUE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
KDPKDP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
KVUEKVUE on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
KDPKDP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors KVUE, analyst targets favor KDP. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | KDP | KVUE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8.1% | +1% | KDP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +12.9% | +5.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KVUE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | KVUE | 51 vs 59 |
| Fundamentals | KVUEon balance | revenue growth 83.8% vs 1.2%; EPS growth -77.9% vs -4%; TTM ROE 5.6% vs 15.6%; gross margin 49.4% vs 58.2%; operating margin 16.8% vs 19.5% — KVUE takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 45 vs 44 |
| Technicals | KDP | Price vs 50-day 11.1% vs 5%; vs 200-day 16.7% vs 6.4% |
| Risk Resilience | KVUE | Risk Resilience 46 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | KDP | Target upside 8.1% vs 1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of KDP and KVUE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on KVUE.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28KVUE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- KVUE +8
- 51 vs 59
- 7 sessions ago
- KVUE +8
- 51 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- KVUE +6
- 42 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- KVUE +5
- 50 vs 55
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when KVUE moved ahead of KDP.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only KDP
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.1%)
5 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 7 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active, Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
KVUE leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.53%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.28%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1KDP closes the Quality gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to KVUE's edge.
- 2KDP's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3KVUE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
KVUE leads on balance| Metric | KDP | KVUE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 83.8% | 1.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -78% | -4% |
| Gross margin | 49.4% | 58.2% |
| Operating margin | 16.8% | 19.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 5.6% | 15.6% |
| Debt to equity | 1.37 | 0.8 |
Performance
KDP leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | KDP | KVUE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 14% | 9.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 10.6% | 0.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 20.7% | 12.2% |
| Year to date | 24.4% | 12.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 28.6% | 28.9% |
Technicals
KDP has the stronger structure| Metric | KDP | KVUE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 81.8 | 73.1 |
| ADX (14) | 32 | 31.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 11.1% | 5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 16.7% | 6.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 22.8% | 26.4% |
Risk
KVUE is the more resilient| Metric | KDP | KVUE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.71 | 1.14 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.16 | 2.09 |
| Max drawdown | -18.4% | -13.3% |
| Current drawdown | -0.7% | -2.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 26.4% | 24.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.4% | -2.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, KDP or KVUE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, KVUE is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 59 against KDP's 51. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is KDP or KVUE the better buy right now?
KVUE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor KVUE over KDP?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. KVUE leads Quality by 23 points; KVUE leads Risk Resilience by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, KDP or KVUE?
Analyst price targets imply +8.1% upside for KDP and +1% for KVUE, so the Street currently favors KDP. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors KVUE. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, KDP or KVUE?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, KDP or KVUE?
KDP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, KDP or KVUE?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, KDP or KVUE?
KVUE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. KVUE on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is KDP more profitable than KVUE?
KVUE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 49.4% vs 58.2%; operating margin 16.8% vs 19.5%; ttm roe 5.6% vs 15.6%.
Is KVUE's lead over KDP getting stronger or weaker?
KVUE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when KVUE moved ahead of KDP.
What would change the KDP vs KVUE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: KDP closes the Quality gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to KVUE's edge; KDP's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; KVUE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about KDP and KVUE?
KDP: 6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. KVUE: 5 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on KDP is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On KVUE it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare KDP and KVUE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.