KEYS vs MSCI Stock Comparison
Compare KEYS and MSCI across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between KEYS and MSCI?
KEYS leads the current stock comparison as Keysight Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Keysight Technologies, Inc. vs MSCI Inc.
KEYS leads
KEYS leads by 21 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, and the lead has widened from 10 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors MSCI on target upside.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support KEYS, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
MSCI Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors KEYS over MSCI, 61 versus 40 as of Sep 11, 2026. KEYS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value. KEYS also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors MSCI. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KEYS today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. KEYS lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 21 points over 30 sessions. KEYS leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Keysight Technologies, Inc. and MSCI Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare KEYS and MSCI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum71 vs 28KEYS +43
- Value41 vs 24KEYS +17
- Quality73 vs 60KEYS +13
- Risk Resilience60 vs 53KEYS +7
5 of 6 evidence groups favor KEYS. KEYS’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -7
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
KEYS's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — KEYS and MSCI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
KEYS (Keysight Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
MSCI (MSCI Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
KEYSKEYS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
KEYSKEYS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
KEYSKEYS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
KEYSKEYS on the Momentum factor, by 43 points.
Lower downside
KEYSKEYS on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
MSCIMSCI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors KEYS, analyst targets favor MSCI. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | KEYS | MSCI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +17.9% | +27.1% | MSCI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +33.8% | +20.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KEYS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | KEYS | 61 vs 40 |
| Fundamentals | KEYSon balance | revenue growth 7.5% vs 1.9%; EPS growth 13.4% vs -15.2%; TTM ROE 20.1% vs -54.1%; gross margin 64.7% vs 83%; operating margin 20.3% vs 55.7% — KEYS takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | KEYS | Value 41 vs 24 |
| Technicals | KEYS | Price vs 50-day 4% vs -4.1%; vs 200-day 12% vs -4.4% |
| Risk Resilience | KEYS | Risk Resilience 60 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | MSCI | Target upside 17.9% vs 27.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of KEYS and MSCI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 21 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on KEYS.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10KEYS lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 21 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- KEYS +21
- 61 vs 40
- 7 sessions ago
- KEYS +5
- 54 vs 49
- 30 sessions ago
- KEYS +10
- 52 vs 42
- 90 sessions ago
- MSCI +6
- 44 vs 50
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Jul 21 when KEYS moved ahead of MSCI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (11.92%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.90%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
MSCI is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.99%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.28%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MSCI closes the Momentum gap — currently 43 points behind, the largest single contributor to KEYS's edge.
- 2MSCI's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3KEYS's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
KEYS leads on balance| Metric | KEYS | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7.5% | 1.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 13.4% | -15.2% |
| Gross margin | 64.7% | 83% |
| Operating margin | 20.3% | 55.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 20.1% | -54.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.42 | -2.43 |
Performance
KEYS leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | KEYS | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.3% | -2.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -8.1% | -2.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 0.5% | -10% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 14.6% | 0.1% |
| Year to date | 60.3% | -4.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 92.4% | -4.5% |
Technicals
KEYS has the stronger structure| Metric | KEYS | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 58.3 | 37.5 |
| ADX (14) | 12.7 | 12.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4% | -4.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 12% | -4.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 36.3% | 26% |
Risk
KEYS is the more resilient| Metric | KEYS | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.85 | 0.4 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.62 | -0.1 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.63 | -0.13 |
| Max drawdown | -20.5% | -18.1% |
| Current drawdown | -12.8% | -14.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 43.9% | 30.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.7% | -2.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, KEYS or MSCI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, KEYS is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 61 against MSCI's 40. The edge comes from momentum and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is KEYS or MSCI the better buy right now?
KEYS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor KEYS over MSCI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. KEYS leads Momentum by 43 points; KEYS leads Value by 17 points; KEYS leads Quality by 13 points. KEYS leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by MSCI simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, KEYS or MSCI?
Analyst price targets imply +17.9% upside for KEYS and +27.1% for MSCI, so the Street currently favors MSCI. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors KEYS. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, KEYS or MSCI?
KEYS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. KEYS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, KEYS or MSCI?
KEYS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, KEYS or MSCI?
KEYS on the Momentum factor, by 43 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, KEYS or MSCI?
KEYS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. KEYS on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is KEYS more profitable than MSCI?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 64.7% vs 83%; operating margin 20.3% vs 55.7%; ttm roe 20.1% vs -54.1%. KEYS leads on one measure and MSCI on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is KEYS's lead over MSCI getting stronger or weaker?
KEYS lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 21 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-21, when KEYS moved ahead of MSCI.
What would change the KEYS vs MSCI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MSCI closes the Momentum gap — currently 43 points behind, the largest single contributor to KEYS's edge; MSCI's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; KEYS's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about KEYS and MSCI?
KEYS: 3 bullish / 0 bearish. MSCI: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on KEYS is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On MSCI it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare KEYS and MSCI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.