KKR vs MKTX Stock Comparison
MKTX currently leads KKR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 66 vs 38. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between KKR and MKTX?
MKTX leads the current stock comparison as MarketAxess Holdings Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
KKR & Co. Inc. vs MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
MKTX leads
MKTX leads by 28 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, but the lead has narrowed from 31 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors KKR on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support MKTX, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
KKR & Co. Inc.
MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors MKTX over KKR, 66 versus 38 as of Oct 22, 2026. MKTX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum. MKTX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors KKR. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MKTX today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. MKTX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 31 to 28 points over 30 sessions.
Compare KKR & Co. Inc. and MarketAxess Holdings Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare KKR and MKTX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality37 vs 83MKTX +46
- Momentum37 vs 77MKTX +40
- Risk Resilience57 vs 87MKTX +30
- Value29 vs 28Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor MKTX. MKTX’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
MKTX's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — KKR and MKTX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
MKTX (MarketAxess Holdings Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
KKR (KKR & Co. Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 29.3% against 1.6%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
MKTXMKTX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
KKRKKR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
MKTXMKTX on the Momentum factor, by 40 points.
Lower downside
MKTXMKTX on Risk Resilience, by 30 points.
Analyst upside
KKRKKR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors MKTX, analyst targets favor KKR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | KKR | MKTX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +38.6% | -3.8% | KKR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +40.1% | +55% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | KKR | MKTX |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 6.61% | 4.84% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.530 | $2.400 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.730 | $3.040 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #197 | #257 |
KKR grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 6.61% a year against MKTX's 4.84%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MKTX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | MKTX | 38 vs 66 |
| Fundamentals | MKTXon balance | revenue growth 53.2% vs -6.4%; EPS growth 80.5% vs -12.7%; TTM ROE 10.3% vs 24.7%; gross margin 46.5% vs 67.5%; operating margin 17.6% vs 40.5% — MKTX takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 29 vs 28 |
| Technicals | MKTX | Price vs 50-day -10.1% vs 0.5%; vs 200-day -11.2% vs 5.7% |
| Risk Resilience | MKTX | Risk Resilience 57 vs 87 |
| Analyst expectations | KKR | Target upside 38.6% vs -3.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of KKR and MKTX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 28 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on MKTX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20MKTX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 31 to 28 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- MKTX +28
- 38 vs 66
- 7 sessions ago
- MKTX +29
- 35 vs 64
- 30 sessions ago
- MKTX +31
- 34 vs 65
- 90 sessions ago
- MKTX +17
- 46 vs 63
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only KKR
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.55%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only MKTX
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (4.95%)
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (0.24%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
MKTX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.74%, AIQ +3 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.14%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1KKR closes the Quality gap — currently 46 points behind, the largest single contributor to MKTX's edge.
- 2KKR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3MKTX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 28-point move would eliminate MKTX's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MKTX leads on balance| Metric | KKR | MKTX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 53.2% | -6.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 80.5% | -12.7% |
| Gross margin | 46.5% | 67.5% |
| Operating margin | 17.6% | 40.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.3% | 24.7% |
| Debt to equity | 1.63 | 0.14 |
Performance
MKTX leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | KKR | MKTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.4% | 0% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -9.4% | 0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.6% | 45.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -14.6% | 0.1% |
| Year to date | -30% | -9.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -24.1% | -3.8% |
Technicals
MKTX has the stronger structure| Metric | KKR | MKTX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 44 | 68.9 |
| ADX (14) | 35.2 | 62.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -10.1% | 0.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -11.2% | 5.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 29.3% | 1.6% |
Risk
MKTX is the more resilient| Metric | KKR | MKTX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.47 | 0.16 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.65 | -0.03 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.92 | -0.05 |
| Max drawdown | -41.3% | -43.6% |
| Current drawdown | -37.5% | -15% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.7% | 39.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.8% | -2.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, KKR or MKTX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, MKTX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 66 against KKR's 38. The edge comes from quality and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is KKR or MKTX the better buy right now?
MKTX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor MKTX over KKR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MKTX leads Quality by 46 points; MKTX leads Momentum by 40 points; MKTX leads Risk Resilience by 30 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, KKR or MKTX?
Analyst price targets imply +38.6% upside for KKR and -3.8% for MKTX, so the Street currently favors KKR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors MKTX. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, KKR or MKTX?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, KKR or MKTX?
KKR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, KKR or MKTX?
MKTX on the Momentum factor, by 40 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, KKR or MKTX?
MKTX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MKTX on Risk Resilience, by 30 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is KKR more profitable than MKTX?
MKTX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 46.5% vs 67.5%; operating margin 17.6% vs 40.5%; ttm roe 10.3% vs 24.7%.
Is MKTX's lead over KKR getting stronger or weaker?
MKTX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 31 to 28 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the KKR vs MKTX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: KKR closes the Quality gap — currently 46 points behind, the largest single contributor to MKTX's edge; KKR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; MKTX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 28-point move would eliminate MKTX's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about KKR and MKTX?
KKR: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. MKTX: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on KKR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On MKTX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare KKR and MKTX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.