KKR vs NDAQ Stock Comparison
NDAQ currently leads KKR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 53 vs 38. The clearest difference is momentum, while KKR has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between KKR and NDAQ?
NDAQ leads the current stock comparison as Nasdaq, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
KKR & Co. Inc. vs Nasdaq, Inc.
NDAQ leads
NDAQ leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 11 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors KKR on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support NDAQ, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
KKR & Co. Inc.
Nasdaq, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NDAQ over KKR, 53 versus 38 as of Oct 22, 2026. NDAQ's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while KKR holds the stronger value profile. NDAQ also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors KKR. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NDAQ today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. NDAQ lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 15 points over 30 sessions.
Compare KKR & Co. Inc. and Nasdaq, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare KKR and NDAQ against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum37 vs 72NDAQ +35
- Quality37 vs 61NDAQ +24
- Value29 vs 25KKR +4
- Risk Resilience57 vs 61NDAQ +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor NDAQ. NDAQ’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; KKR keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +18
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
NDAQ's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — KKR and NDAQ both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
KKR (KKR & Co. Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 29.3% against 17.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NDAQNDAQ on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
KKRKKR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
KKRKKR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
NDAQNDAQ on the Momentum factor, by 35 points.
Lower downside
NDAQNDAQ on Risk Resilience, by 4 points.
Analyst upside
KKRKKR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors NDAQ, analyst targets favor KKR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | KKR | NDAQ | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +38.6% | +16% | KKR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +40.1% | +17.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | KKR | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 6.61% | 10.18% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.530 | $0.647 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.730 | $1.050 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #197 | #96 |
NDAQ grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 10.18% a year against KKR's 6.61%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NDAQ. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NDAQ | 38 vs 53 |
| Fundamentals | NDAQon balance | revenue growth 53.2% vs 18.5%; EPS growth 80.5% vs -2.2%; TTM ROE 10.3% vs 16.3%; gross margin 46.5% vs 59.4%; operating margin 17.6% vs 31.6% — NDAQ takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | KKR | Value 29 vs 25 |
| Technicals | NDAQ | Price vs 50-day -10.1% vs 1.6%; vs 200-day -11.2% vs 4.8% |
| Risk Resilience | NDAQ | Risk Resilience 57 vs 61 |
| Analyst expectations | KKR | Target upside 38.6% vs 16% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of KKR and NDAQ and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NDAQ.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20NDAQ lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 15 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NDAQ +15
- 38 vs 53
- 7 sessions ago
- NDAQ +12
- 35 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- NDAQ +11
- 34 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- NDAQ +6
- 46 vs 52
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jun 23 when NDAQ moved ahead of KKR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only KKR
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.55%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
Only NDAQ
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (4.59%)
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
KKR is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.74%, AIQ +3 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.39%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1KKR closes the Momentum gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to NDAQ's edge.
- 2KKR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3NDAQ's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NDAQ leads on balance| Metric | KKR | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 53.2% | 18.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 80.5% | -2.2% |
| Gross margin | 46.5% | 59.4% |
| Operating margin | 17.6% | 31.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.3% | 16.3% |
| Debt to equity | 1.63 | 0.77 |
Performance
NDAQ leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | KKR | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.4% | 1.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -9.4% | 0.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.6% | 4.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -14.6% | 8.2% |
| Year to date | -30% | -2.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -24.1% | 7.1% |
Technicals
NDAQ has the stronger structure| Metric | KKR | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 44 | 60.7 |
| ADX (14) | 35.2 | 14.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -10.1% | 1.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -11.2% | 4.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 29.3% | 17.8% |
Risk
NDAQ is the more resilient| Metric | KKR | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.47 | 0.64 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.65 | 0.24 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.92 | 0.31 |
| Max drawdown | -41.3% | -23.9% |
| Current drawdown | -37.5% | -6.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.7% | 27.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.8% | -2.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, KKR or NDAQ?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NDAQ is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 53 against KKR's 38. The edge comes from momentum and quality. KKR is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is KKR or NDAQ the better buy right now?
NDAQ carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NDAQ over KKR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. NDAQ leads Momentum by 35 points; NDAQ leads Quality by 24 points; KKR leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, KKR or NDAQ?
Analyst price targets imply +38.6% upside for KKR and +16% for NDAQ, so the Street currently favors KKR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors NDAQ. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, KKR or NDAQ?
KKR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. KKR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, KKR or NDAQ?
KKR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, KKR or NDAQ?
NDAQ on the Momentum factor, by 35 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, KKR or NDAQ?
NDAQ is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NDAQ on Risk Resilience, by 4 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is KKR more profitable than NDAQ?
NDAQ leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 46.5% vs 59.4%; operating margin 17.6% vs 31.6%; ttm roe 10.3% vs 16.3%.
Is NDAQ's lead over KKR getting stronger or weaker?
NDAQ lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 15 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-06-23, when NDAQ moved ahead of KKR.
What would change the KKR vs NDAQ verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: KKR closes the Momentum gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to NDAQ's edge; KKR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; NDAQ's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about KKR and NDAQ?
KKR: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. NDAQ: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on KKR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On NDAQ it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare KKR and NDAQ with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.