KKR vs OWL Stock Comparison
Compare KKR vs OWL on performance, valuation, growth, fundamentals, momentum and risk; the current AIQ evidence does not show a clear headline leader.
What is the main difference between KKR and OWL?
KKR and OWL are close on the current AIQ evidence, so the better fit depends more on objective, risk tolerance and valuation preference than on a single headline score.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
KKR & Co. Inc. vs Blue Owl Capital Inc.
KKR and OWL are effectively level
KKR and OWL are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
KKR & Co. Inc.
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate KKR and OWL as of Oct 22, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare KKR & Co. Inc. and Blue Owl Capital Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare KKR and OWL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience57 vs 42KKR +15
- Value29 vs 39OWL +10
- Momentum37 vs 44OWL +7
- Quality37 vs 31KKR +6
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
OWL's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — KKR and OWL both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EvenNeither separates on the overall score.
Growth
KKRKKR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OWLOWL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
OWLOWL on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
KKRKKR on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
KKRKKR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | KKR | OWL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +38.6% | +18.9% | KKR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +40.1% | +73.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 38 vs 38 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth 80.5% vs -27.2%; TTM ROE 10.3% vs 3.8%; gross margin 46.5% vs 61.1%; operating margin 17.6% vs 22.6% |
| Valuation | OWL | Value 29 vs 39 |
| Technicals | KKR | Price vs 50-day -10.1% vs -12.3%; vs 200-day -11.2% vs -12.8% |
| Risk Resilience | KKR | Risk Resilience 57 vs 42 |
| Analyst expectations | KKR | Target upside 38.6% vs 18.9% |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 0 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20- Today
- Level
- 38 vs 38
- 7 sessions ago
- OWL +1
- 35 vs 36
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 34 vs 34
- 90 sessions ago
- KKR +2
- 46 vs 44
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 8 when OWL moved ahead of KKR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only OWL
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.99%)
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.74%, AIQ +3 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.33%, AIQ +2 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | KKR | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 53.2% | -0.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 80.5% | -27.2% |
| Gross margin | 46.5% | 61.1% |
| Operating margin | 17.6% | 22.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.3% | 3.8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.63 | 2.18 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | KKR | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.4% | -1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -9.4% | -6.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.6% | 0.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -14.6% | -6.8% |
| Year to date | -30% | -38.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -24.1% | -42.1% |
Technicals
KKR has the stronger structure| Metric | KKR | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 44 | 52.4 |
| ADX (14) | 35.2 | 31.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -10.1% | -12.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -11.2% | -12.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 29.3% | 34.9% |
Risk
KKR is the more resilient| Metric | KKR | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.47 | 1.62 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.65 | -1.1 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.92 | -1.85 |
| Max drawdown | -41.3% | -52.1% |
| Current drawdown | -37.5% | -46.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.7% | 45.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.8% | -4.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which has more analyst upside, KKR or OWL?
Analyst price targets imply +38.6% upside for KKR and +18.9% for OWL, so the Street currently favors KKR. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, KKR or OWL?
OWL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OWL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, KKR or OWL?
KKR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, KKR or OWL?
OWL on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, KKR or OWL?
KKR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. KKR on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is KKR more profitable than OWL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 46.5% vs 61.1%; operating margin 17.6% vs 22.6%; ttm roe 10.3% vs 3.8%. KKR leads on one measure and OWL on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
What do the current signals say about KKR and OWL?
KKR: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. OWL: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on KKR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On OWL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare KKR and OWL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.