LKQ vs NSSC Stock Comparison
Compare LKQ and NSSC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between LKQ and NSSC?
NSSC leads the current stock comparison as Napco Security Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
LKQ Corporation vs Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
NSSC leads
NSSC leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 2 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support NSSC, and its lead is widening.
LKQ Corporation
Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NSSC over LKQ, 54 versus 49 as of Sep 11, 2026. NSSC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while LKQ holds the stronger value profile. NSSC also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NSSC today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. NSSC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare LKQ Corporation and Napco Security Technologies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare LKQ and NSSC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality42 vs 80NSSC +38
- Value71 vs 44LKQ +27
- Momentum24 vs 30NSSC +6
- Risk Resilience58 vs 61Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor NSSC. NSSC’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; LKQ keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
NSSC's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — LKQ and NSSC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NSSC (Napco Security Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
LKQ (LKQ Corporation): the counter-case, on value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NSSCNSSC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
LKQLKQ on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
LKQLKQ on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points.
Momentum
NSSCNSSC on the Momentum factor, by 6 points.
Lower downside
LKQLKQ carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
NSSCNSSC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | LKQ | NSSC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +28.9% | +43.4% | NSSC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +37% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NSSC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NSSC | 49 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | NSSCon balance | revenue growth -1.8% vs 13.5%; EPS growth 71% vs 51%; TTM ROE 7.1% vs 23.6%; gross margin 37.7% vs 59.2%; operating margin 6.8% vs 22.6% — NSSC takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | LKQ | Value 71 vs 44 |
| Technicals | NSSC | Price vs 50-day -4.1% vs -2.6%; vs 200-day -17.7% vs -11.3% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 58 vs 61 |
| Analyst expectations | NSSC | Target upside 28.9% vs 43.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of LKQ and NSSC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NSSC.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10NSSC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NSSC +5
- 49 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- LKQ +2
- 57 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- NSSC +2
- 59 vs 61
- 90 sessions ago
- NSSC +4
- 53 vs 57
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Sep 8 when NSSC moved ahead of LKQ.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (14.18%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (7.47%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
LKQ is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.03%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.11%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1LKQ closes the Quality gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to NSSC's edge.
- 2LKQ's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3NSSC starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NSSC leads on balance| Metric | LKQ | NSSC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.8% | 13.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 71% | 51% |
| Gross margin | 37.7% | 59.2% |
| Operating margin | 6.8% | 22.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 7.1% | 23.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.82 | 0.03 |
Performance
NSSC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | LKQ | NSSC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.4% | -0.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.4% | -8.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.2% | 0.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -23.7% | -16.5% |
| Year to date | -21.8% | -14.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -27.5% | -10.3% |
Technicals
NSSC has the stronger structure| Metric | LKQ | NSSC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 27 | 36.8 |
| ADX (14) | 9.8 | 36.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.1% | -2.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -17.7% | -11.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 26.2% | 28% |
Risk
Split| Metric | LKQ | NSSC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.6 | 1.23 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.83 | -0.2 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.03 | -0.26 |
| Max drawdown | -35.5% | -26% |
| Current drawdown | -32.1% | -24.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 35% | 40.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -3.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, LKQ or NSSC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NSSC is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 54 against LKQ's 49. The edge comes from quality and momentum. LKQ is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is LKQ or NSSC the better buy right now?
NSSC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NSSC over LKQ?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. NSSC leads Quality by 38 points; LKQ leads Value by 27 points; NSSC leads Momentum by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, LKQ or NSSC?
Analyst price targets imply +28.9% upside for LKQ and +43.4% for NSSC, so the Street currently favors NSSC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, LKQ or NSSC?
LKQ is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. LKQ on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, LKQ or NSSC?
LKQ on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, LKQ or NSSC?
NSSC on the Momentum factor, by 6 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, LKQ or NSSC?
LKQ is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. LKQ carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is LKQ more profitable than NSSC?
NSSC leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 37.7% vs 59.2%; operating margin 6.8% vs 22.6%; ttm roe 7.1% vs 23.6%.
Is NSSC's lead over LKQ getting stronger or weaker?
NSSC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-08, when NSSC moved ahead of LKQ.
What would change the LKQ vs NSSC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: LKQ closes the Quality gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to NSSC's edge; LKQ's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; NSSC starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about LKQ and NSSC?
LKQ: 2 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. NSSC: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on LKQ is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On NSSC it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare LKQ and NSSC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.