LKQ vs PCAR Stock Comparison
Compare LKQ and PCAR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between LKQ and PCAR?
LKQ leads the current stock comparison as LKQ Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
LKQ Corporation vs PACCAR Inc
LKQ leads
LKQ leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Value, but the lead has narrowed from 9 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support LKQ, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
LKQ Corporation
PACCAR Inc
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors LKQ over PCAR, 49 versus 48 as of Sep 11, 2026. LKQ's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while PCAR holds the stronger risk resilience profile. LKQ also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LKQ today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. LKQ lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare LKQ Corporation and PACCAR Inc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare LKQ and PCAR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience58 vs 77PCAR +19
- Value71 vs 55LKQ +16
- Momentum24 vs 31PCAR +7
- Quality42 vs 39Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor LKQ. LKQ’s edge is concentrated in value; PCAR keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
LKQ's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — LKQ and PCAR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
LKQ (LKQ Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
PCAR (PACCAR Inc): the counter-case, on risk resilience, momentum, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
LKQLKQ on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
LKQLKQ on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
LKQLKQ on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
PCARPCAR on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
PCARPCAR on Risk Resilience, by 19 points.
Analyst upside
LKQLKQ on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | LKQ | PCAR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +28.9% | +6.3% | LKQ has more room |
| Target dispersion | +37% | +22.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LKQ. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 49 vs 48 |
| Fundamentals | PCARon balance | revenue growth -1.8% vs 21.1%; EPS growth 71% vs 24.3%; TTM ROE 7.1% vs 12.7%; gross margin 37.7% vs 14.9%; operating margin 6.8% vs 9.8% — PCAR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | LKQ | Value 71 vs 55 |
| Technicals | PCAR | Price vs 50-day -4.1% vs -4.1%; vs 200-day -17.7% vs 2% |
| Risk Resilience | PCAR | Risk Resilience 58 vs 77 |
| Analyst expectations | LKQ | Target upside 28.9% vs 6.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of LKQ and PCAR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on LKQ.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10LKQ lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- LKQ +1
- 49 vs 48
- 7 sessions ago
- LKQ +9
- 57 vs 48
- 30 sessions ago
- LKQ +9
- 59 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- PCAR +2
- 53 vs 55
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Aug 14 when LKQ moved ahead of PCAR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (14.18%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.42%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
LKQ leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.03%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.13%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PCAR closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to LKQ's edge.
- 2PCAR's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3LKQ's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate LKQ's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PCAR leads on balance| Metric | LKQ | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.8% | 21.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 71% | 24.3% |
| Gross margin | 37.7% | 14.9% |
| Operating margin | 6.8% | 9.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 7.1% | 12.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.82 | 0.72 |
Performance
PCAR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | LKQ | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.4% | 0.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.4% | -6.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.2% | 7.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -23.7% | 3.8% |
| Year to date | -21.8% | 11.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -27.5% | 24.8% |
Technicals
PCAR has the stronger structure| Metric | LKQ | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 27 | 31.4 |
| ADX (14) | 9.8 | 24.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.1% | -4.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -17.7% | 2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 26.2% | 17.6% |
Risk
PCAR is the more resilient| Metric | LKQ | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.6 | 0.96 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.83 | 0.83 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.03 | 1.56 |
| Max drawdown | -35.5% | -15.6% |
| Current drawdown | -32.1% | -11.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 35% | 27.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -2.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, LKQ or PCAR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, LKQ is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 49 against PCAR's 48. The edge comes from value. PCAR is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is LKQ or PCAR the better buy right now?
LKQ carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor LKQ over PCAR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PCAR leads Risk Resilience by 19 points; LKQ leads Value by 16 points; PCAR leads Momentum by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, LKQ or PCAR?
Analyst price targets imply +28.9% upside for LKQ and +6.3% for PCAR, so the Street currently favors LKQ. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, LKQ or PCAR?
LKQ is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. LKQ on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, LKQ or PCAR?
LKQ on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, LKQ or PCAR?
PCAR on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, LKQ or PCAR?
PCAR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PCAR on Risk Resilience, by 19 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is LKQ more profitable than PCAR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 37.7% vs 14.9%; operating margin 6.8% vs 9.8%; ttm roe 7.1% vs 12.7%. LKQ leads on one measure and PCAR on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is LKQ's lead over PCAR getting stronger or weaker?
LKQ lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-14, when LKQ moved ahead of PCAR.
What would change the LKQ vs PCAR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PCAR closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to LKQ's edge; PCAR's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; LKQ's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate LKQ's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about LKQ and PCAR?
LKQ: 2 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PCAR: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on LKQ is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PCAR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare LKQ and PCAR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.