LNT vs NJR Stock Comparison
Compare LNT and NJR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between LNT and NJR?
NJR leads the current stock comparison as New Jersey Resources Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Alliant Energy Corporation vs New Jersey Resources Corporation
NJR leads
NJR leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support NJR, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Alliant Energy Corporation
New Jersey Resources Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NJR over LNT, 44 versus 38 as of Sep 11, 2026. NJR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum. NJR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NJR today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. NJR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Alliant Energy Corporation and New Jersey Resources Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare LNT and NJR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value43 vs 59NJR +16
- Momentum27 vs 32NJR +5
- Quality36 vs 35Even
- Risk Resilience53 vs 52Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor NJR. NJR’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -6
No new signals fired.
NJR's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — LNT and NJR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NJR (New Jersey Resources Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
LNT (Alliant Energy Corporation): the counter-case, on fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NJRNJR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
LNTLNT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NJRNJR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
NJRNJR on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
LNTLNT carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | LNT | NJR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +15.3% | +16% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +11.6% | +3.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NJR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NJR | 38 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | LNTon balance | revenue growth -18% vs -62.8%; EPS growth -24.1% vs -95.6%; TTM ROE 11% vs 14.4%; gross margin 42% vs 28.3%; operating margin 22.1% vs 24.6% — LNT takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | NJR | Value 43 vs 59 |
| Technicals | NJR | Price vs 50-day -6% vs -5.5%; vs 200-day -3.8% vs 0.1% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 53 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 15.3% vs 16% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of LNT and NJR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NJR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10NJR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NJR +6
- 38 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- NJR +7
- 38 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- NJR +3
- 41 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- NJR +3
- 51 vs 54
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Jun 23 when NJR moved ahead of LNT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.60%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (5.26%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.01%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.34%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1LNT closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to NJR's edge.
- 2LNT's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3NJR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
LNT leads on balance| Metric | LNT | NJR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -18% | -62.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -24.1% | -95.6% |
| Gross margin | 42% | 28.3% |
| Operating margin | 22.1% | 24.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11% | 14.4% |
| Debt to equity | 1.61 | 1.47 |
Performance
NJR leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | LNT | NJR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.7% | -0.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.3% | -3.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.3% | -3.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -5% | -1.1% |
| Year to date | 3.4% | 15.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 5% | 15.3% |
Technicals
NJR has the stronger structure| Metric | LNT | NJR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 32.4 | 38.1 |
| ADX (14) | 17.3 | 22.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6% | -5.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -3.8% | 0.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 12.5% | 15.3% |
Risk
Split| Metric | LNT | NJR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.09 | -0.39 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.14 | 0.62 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.21 | 0.98 |
| Max drawdown | -13.8% | -11.2% |
| Current drawdown | -13.8% | -11.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 16.4% | 18.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.7% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, LNT or NJR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NJR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 44 against LNT's 38. The edge comes from value and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is LNT or NJR the better buy right now?
NJR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NJR over LNT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. NJR leads Value by 16 points; NJR leads Momentum by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, LNT or NJR?
Analyst price targets imply +15.3% upside for LNT and +16% for NJR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, LNT or NJR?
NJR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NJR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, LNT or NJR?
LNT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, LNT or NJR?
NJR on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, LNT or NJR?
LNT is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. LNT carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is LNT more profitable than NJR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 42% vs 28.3%; operating margin 22.1% vs 24.6%; ttm roe 11% vs 14.4%. LNT leads on one measure and NJR on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is NJR's lead over LNT getting stronger or weaker?
NJR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-23, when NJR moved ahead of LNT.
What would change the LNT vs NJR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: LNT closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to NJR's edge; LNT's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; NJR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about LNT and NJR?
LNT: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. NJR: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on LNT is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On NJR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare LNT and NJR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.