LNTH vs NTRA Stock Comparison
LNTH currently leads NTRA in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 60 vs 54. The clearest difference is value, while NTRA has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between LNTH and NTRA?
LNTH leads the current stock comparison as Lantheus Holdings, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Lantheus Holdings, Inc. vs Natera, Inc.
LNTH leads
LNTH leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 9 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support LNTH, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
Natera, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors LNTH over NTRA, 60 versus 54 as of Oct 31, 2026. LNTH's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while NTRA holds the stronger momentum profile. LNTH also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LNTH today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. LNTH lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Lantheus Holdings, Inc. and Natera, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare LNTH and NTRA against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum48 vs 74NTRA +26
- Value52 vs 34LNTH +18
- Quality73 vs 57LNTH +16
- Risk Resilience72 vs 57LNTH +15
4 of 6 evidence groups favor LNTH. LNTH’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; NTRA keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-30, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-29.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
LNTH's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — LNTH and NTRA both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
LNTH (Lantheus Holdings, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
NTRA (Natera, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 37.2% against 3.3%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
LNTHLNTH on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
NTRANTRA on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
LNTHLNTH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points.
Momentum
NTRANTRA on the Momentum factor, by 26 points.
Lower downside
LNTHLNTH on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
LNTHLNTH on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | LNTH | NTRA | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8.6% | -17.4% | LNTH has more room |
| Target dispersion | +28.4% | +81.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 16 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LNTH. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | LNTH | 60 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | NTRAon balance | revenue growth 2.9% vs 8.1%; EPS growth -37.2% vs 21.7%; TTM ROE 23.3% vs -11.7%; gross margin 60.1% vs 65.3%; operating margin 19.4% vs -10.7% — NTRA takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | LNTH | Value 52 vs 34 |
| Technicals | NTRA | Price vs 50-day 0.2% vs 11.1%; vs 200-day 10.2% vs 60.6% |
| Risk Resilience | LNTH | Risk Resilience 72 vs 57 |
| Analyst expectations | LNTH | Target upside 8.6% vs -17.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of LNTH and NTRA and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on LNTH.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jul 1 – Oct 30LNTH lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- LNTH +6
- 60 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- LNTH +12
- 59 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- LNTH +9
- 60 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- LNTH +6
- 59 vs 53
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Oct 6 when LNTH moved ahead of NTRA.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only LNTH
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (0.43%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
4 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only NTRA
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.97%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.0%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active.
NTRA is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.14%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -4.98%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NTRA closes the Value gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to LNTH's edge.
- 2NTRA's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3LNTH's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate LNTH's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NTRA leads on balance| Metric | LNTH | NTRA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.9% | 8.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -37.2% | 21.7% |
| Gross margin | 60.1% | 65.3% |
| Operating margin | 19.4% | -10.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 23.3% | -11.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.48 | 0.13 |
Performance
NTRA leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | LNTH | NTRA |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.1% | 2.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.6% | 2.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -0.9% | 57.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 23.3% | 117.9% |
| Year to date | 50.4% | 80.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 78.6% | 120.5% |
Technicals
NTRA has the stronger structure| Metric | LNTH | NTRA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 49.5 | 68.2 |
| ADX (14) | 15.2 | 31.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.2% | 11.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 10.2% | 60.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 3.3% | 37.2% |
Risk
LNTH is the more resilient| Metric | LNTH | NTRA |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.59 | 1.28 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.83 | 2.94 |
| Max drawdown | -12.2% | -28.2% |
| Current drawdown | -9.8% | -0.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 32.4% | 48.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -3.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, LNTH or NTRA?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, LNTH is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 60 against NTRA's 54. The edge comes from value and quality. NTRA is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is LNTH or NTRA the better buy right now?
LNTH carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor LNTH over NTRA?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. NTRA leads Momentum by 26 points; LNTH leads Value by 18 points; LNTH leads Quality by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, LNTH or NTRA?
Analyst price targets imply +8.6% upside for LNTH and -17.4% for NTRA, so the Street currently favors LNTH. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, LNTH or NTRA?
LNTH is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. LNTH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, LNTH or NTRA?
NTRA on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, LNTH or NTRA?
NTRA on the Momentum factor, by 26 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, LNTH or NTRA?
LNTH is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. LNTH on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is LNTH more profitable than NTRA?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 60.1% vs 65.3%; operating margin 19.4% vs -10.7%; ttm roe 23.3% vs -11.7%. LNTH leads on two measures and NTRA on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is LNTH's lead over NTRA getting stronger or weaker?
LNTH lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-07-01 and 2026-10-30. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-06, when LNTH moved ahead of NTRA.
What would change the LNTH vs NTRA verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NTRA closes the Value gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to LNTH's edge; NTRA's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; LNTH's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate LNTH's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about LNTH and NTRA?
LNTH: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. NTRA: 4 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on LNTH is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On NTRA it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare LNTH and NTRA with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.