LSCC vs NVTS Stock Comparison
Compare LSCC and NVTS across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between LSCC and NVTS?
LSCC leads the current stock comparison as Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation vs Navitas Semiconductor Corp
LSCC leads
LSCC leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors NVTS on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support LSCC, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
Navitas Semiconductor Corp
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors LSCC over NVTS, 44 versus 32 as of Sep 11, 2026. LSCC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while NVTS holds the stronger value profile. LSCC also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors NVTS. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LSCC today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. LSCC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Navitas Semiconductor Corp across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare LSCC and NVTS against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality64 vs 30LSCC +34
- Momentum44 vs 27LSCC +17
- Value24 vs 34NVTS +10
- Risk Resilience47 vs 40LSCC +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor LSCC. LSCC’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; NVTS keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No new signals fired.
LSCC's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — LSCC and NVTS both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
NVTS (Navitas Semiconductor Corp): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 66.5% against 42.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
LSCCLSCC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
NVTSNVTS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NVTSNVTS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
LSCCLSCC on the Momentum factor, by 17 points.
Lower downside
LSCCLSCC on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
NVTSNVTS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors LSCC, analyst targets favor NVTS. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | LSCC | NVTS | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +28.8% | +38.1% | NVTS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +32.4% | +52.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LSCC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | LSCC | 44 vs 32 |
| Fundamentals | LSCCon balance | revenue growth 17.7% vs 22.5%; EPS growth -12.5% vs -5.3%; TTM ROE 4.9% vs -61.5%; gross margin 67.7% vs -1.7%; operating margin 7.6% vs -270.2% — LSCC takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | NVTS | Value 24 vs 34 |
| Technicals | LSCC | Price vs 50-day -4.7% vs -7.3%; vs 200-day 5% vs -14% |
| Risk Resilience | LSCC | Risk Resilience 47 vs 40 |
| Analyst expectations | NVTS | Target upside 28.8% vs 38.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of LSCC and NVTS and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on LSCC.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10LSCC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- LSCC +12
- 44 vs 32
- 7 sessions ago
- LSCC +10
- 41 vs 31
- 30 sessions ago
- LSCC +4
- 44 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- LSCC +9
- 41 vs 32
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (15.53%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.78%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.32%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +4.92%, AIQ -1 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +4.3%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NVTS closes the Quality gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to LSCC's edge.
- 2NVTS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3LSCC's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
LSCC leads on balance| Metric | LSCC | NVTS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 17.7% | 22.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -12.5% | -5.3% |
| Gross margin | 67.7% | -1.7% |
| Operating margin | 7.6% | -270.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 4.9% | -61.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.05 | 0.01 |
Performance
LSCC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | LSCC | NVTS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.2% | -0.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -11.7% | -20% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -13.8% | -45.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 25.7% | 2.9% |
| Year to date | 55.1% | 56.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 71.2% | 98.8% |
Technicals
LSCC has the stronger structure| Metric | LSCC | NVTS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 44.4 | 32.6 |
| ADX (14) | 18.5 | 12.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.7% | -7.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5% | -14% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 42.8% | 66.5% |
Risk
LSCC is the more resilient| Metric | LSCC | NVTS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.9 | 4.61 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.15 | 1.1 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.82 | 2.26 |
| Max drawdown | -28.1% | -69.4% |
| Current drawdown | -26.5% | -64.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 59.5% | 126.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.8% | -9.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, LSCC or NVTS?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, LSCC is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 44 against NVTS's 32. The edge comes from quality and momentum. NVTS is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is LSCC or NVTS the better buy right now?
LSCC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor LSCC over NVTS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. LSCC leads Quality by 34 points; LSCC leads Momentum by 17 points; NVTS leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, LSCC or NVTS?
Analyst price targets imply +28.8% upside for LSCC and +38.1% for NVTS, so the Street currently favors NVTS. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors LSCC. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, LSCC or NVTS?
NVTS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NVTS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, LSCC or NVTS?
NVTS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, LSCC or NVTS?
LSCC on the Momentum factor, by 17 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, LSCC or NVTS?
LSCC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. LSCC on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is LSCC more profitable than NVTS?
LSCC leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 67.7% vs -1.7%; operating margin 7.6% vs -270.2%; ttm roe 4.9% vs -61.5%.
Is LSCC's lead over NVTS getting stronger or weaker?
LSCC lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the LSCC vs NVTS verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NVTS closes the Quality gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to LSCC's edge; NVTS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; LSCC's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about LSCC and NVTS?
LSCC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. NVTS: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on LSCC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On NVTS it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare LSCC and NVTS with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.